1

Topic: Tools of automatic testing

Good afternoon! Prompt please good tools of automated applications testing Windows at level GUI. Something in style test complete or ranorax. Was specific it is a question of testing of the CAD-appendix on the basis of AutoCAD'. Many thanks!

2

Re: Tools of automatic testing

What criteria to the tool? What technology is used at an application creation? The written candidates quite anything for many tasks. Probably, it will be useful List of GUI testing tools Well and so I still worked with Froglogic Squish, AutoIt (but it too simple), UFT, RFT. Still there is from a microsoftware something. And many other things. For example, Sikuli Script. Do not forget about possibility to control  through  (which even can to ask be made for this purpose specially) by means of scripts in language convenient for you with removal of screenshots and their subsequent analysis, for example, by means of something similar ImageMagic Once I selected for Qt , selected Froglogic Squish. Lately heard many censures on it. In an Internet is small  about that as I selected and why selected that . Tested 3D a browser for . In general  requirements - we will think.

3

Re: Tools of automatic testing

Hello, Evgeny, you wrote: E> Good afternoon! E> prompt please good tools of automated applications testing Windows at level GUI. E> Something in style test complete or ranorax. E> Was specific it is a question of testing of the CAD-appendix on the basis of AutoCAD'. E> Many thanks! And than sounded do not approach? They like leaders of the market. Better hardly that is, IMHO.

4

Re: Tools of automatic testing

Hello, zubactik, you wrote: Z> What criteria to the tool? What technology is used at an application creation? Z> the written candidates quite anything for many tasks. Z> it is possible, it will be useful List of GUI testing tools Z> Well and so I still worked with Froglogic Squish, AutoIt (but it too simple), UFT, RFT. Still there is from a microsoftware something. Z> and many other things. For example, Sikuli Script. Do not forget about possibility to control  through  (which even can to ask be made for this purpose specially) by means of scripts in language convenient for you with removal of screenshots and their subsequent analysis, for example, by means of something similar ImageMagic Z> Once I selected for Qt , selected Froglogic Squish. Lately heard many censures on it. In an Internet is small  about that as I selected and why selected that . Tested 3D a browser for . Z> in general  requirements - we will think. Thanks for the answer! From  requirements basically the general: Reliability (possibility to fulfill a series of tests automatically within night), and simplicity in usage. From special requirements it is possible to name "accuracy " if it is possible so to express. It is a question about 3D-modellirovanii (tested application is based on AutoCAD'). The basic difference from normal applications - a considerable quantity of operations in one graphic window. Reproducibility of operations in a 3D-scene is thus important - one wrong cliques can spoil all test. In a 3D-scene there are no elements which could be identified on classname, text . The Most part of operations - simple (x, y) - a clique and driving by the mouse. In remaining all also as well as in other applications - buttons, fields of editing and other.

5

Re: Tools of automatic testing

Hello, zubactik, you wrote: Z> What technology is used at an application creation? Forgot to mention used technologies. It is the big mix from AutoLisp, a C ++ and C# (application is developed already almost 25 years)

6

Re: Tools of automatic testing

Hello, bnk, you wrote: bnk> And than sounded do not approach? They like leaders of the market. Better hardly that is, IMHO. Basically they approach, but I was not familiar till now with the market. As a result of searches quitted on these two tools. It was not simple feelings that I did not miss anything important. Thanks for the help!

7

Re: Tools of automatic testing

In that case I can wish good luck only. To automate such - the strange desire and, quite probably, ungrateful occupation. We had active  when I such automated, but to me carried. In the first I had control buttons, and I pressed on them. The scene changed, I did a screenshot, then screenshots compared. As there was the active development and position of the camera in a scene changed, especially stable it was not for the natural reasons. But somehow worked, and like even benefited. If it is necessary to move, I all the same would go by the way of adding  to application - or carrying out of any objects from a scene (that our developers too did, but any more I do not remember than attempt of operation with it ended) that  could cling them, or control of a scene through any auxiliary debug interface. Hemorrhoids quite it can appear less. Also it is quite possible  test scripts so to avoid necessity to drag something on a scene. Anyway successes! You need to check up a little , most likely. To it be ready. Well and mentioned Sikuli just like specialized earlier on cliques by comparing of pictures. But, I will repeat, at first it is necessary to think as not to do such tests. Though for 4 years something could exchange and already with determination of objects on a scene masters to work learned. There will be a desire - . Month through 3 I can revive old customs and try to be engaged.

8

Re: Tools of automatic testing

Hello, zubactik, you wrote: Z> In that case I can wish good luck only. To automate such - the strange desire and, quite probably, ungrateful occupation. Z> we had active  when I such automated, but to me carried. In the first I had control buttons, and I pressed on them. The scene changed, I did a screenshot, then screenshots compared. As there was the active development and position of the camera in a scene changed, especially stable it was not for the natural reasons. But somehow worked, and like even benefited. Z> if it is necessary to move, I all the same would go by the way of adding  to application - or carrying out of any objects from a scene (that our developers too did, but any more I do not remember than attempt of operation with it ended) that  could cling them, or control of a scene through any auxiliary debug interface. Hemorrhoids quite it can appear less. Also it is quite possible  test scripts so to avoid necessity to drag something on a scene. Z> anyway successes! You need to check up a little , most likely. To it be ready. Well and mentioned Sikuli just like specialized earlier on cliques by comparing of pictures. Z> but, I will repeat, at first it is necessary to think as not to do such tests. Though for 4 years something could exchange and already with determination of objects on a scene masters to work learned. There will be a desire - . Month through 3 I can revive old customs and try to be engaged. Many thanks for so torn answer. I agree - automatic testing of a 3D-scene directly - almost as "a way of the kamikaze". For what to "be hooked" at AutoCAD'a is - all commands can be entered through command line. But tests only through command line would be defective. Therefore I check additional possibilities.