26

Re: Programming natural languages, move?

Hello, IQuerist, you wrote: IQ> I so understand the essential difference has an effect on experience "Decision", assumes "responsibility in difference from"outputs". It is all game by words. Pay to me - I will make. But a lot of time and, hence, money is necessary. Because a subject new and the programmer from me . IQ> Nda... You should learn about this world Yes more so much, standard functionality of any programmer - if only  and not to do.

27

Re: Programming natural languages, move?

Hello, IQuerist, you wrote: IQ> Good afternoon... IQ> If I can not fairly understand what tasks "programming in a natural language at all" can solve, since  the majority of programmers manage nasty to program and in the formal languages.... For a long time already biorobots program on  languages. A garden, School, institute, , operation... The book As an example "programs in a natural language" Look at what programs our deputies program -  simply......... And here what tasks solve it is possible to guess.

28

Re: Programming natural languages, move?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Hello, IQuerist, you wrote: IQ>> If I can not fairly understand what tasks "programming in a natural language at all" can solve, since  the majority of programmers manage nasty to program and in the formal languages. Excuse, I can not simply be retained: Image: slide_10.jpg By the way an excellent example of how dreamers want to solve tasks without having concept about their essence.

29

Re: Programming natural languages, move?

Hello, L_G, you wrote: Ops>> And whence it is known, what it generally can be reached? Here people cannot force to formulate normally customers of the requirement, and you about the machine. L_G> so by analogy to normal programming - with it somehow something reach. Read Mythical cheloveko-month of the Brooks. L_G> programming process in a natural language it will be not so mandatory less long and painful, he simply allows to lower requirements to qualification of the programmer (but not the business analyst - actually will be programmed now by an analyst!) ... On yours qualification of the programmer this possession of syntax ? L_G> People in dialogue with the customer does not suffice either time, or patience, meticulousness and understanding that formalization yet did not reach 100 % - at the computer with all it problems are not present. You forgot about a principal problem - about the customer. About its time, patience, meticulousness and understanding. I do not understand than here the computer can help. Whether>>> the new technology  (removing the programmer, but loading an analyst ) - a question, naturally, cardinal allows to save. At least, on time of dialogue of an analyst with the programmer, including through documentation writing/reading (and it is hours of two persons!) saving explicit. Here and I see, how analysts potter with structure of databases, with data acquisition, with dynamics of forms, synchronization, debugging,  etc., etc. you is similar at all in course of that than programmers are engaged