Hello, Sinclair, you wrote: S> you do not understand that the information demands the carrier. The material carrier. Mandatory. Without variants. But further nuances of possible technical implementation begin. If the bit of the data is encoded by presence/absence there is nobody substances in somebody a space place bottomless storage in an any way it is impossible. Owing to, as they say, objective circumstances. For example, the flash card works that locks (or does not lock if not unit, and the zero) electrons in the transistors. Accordingly, the theoretical limit is an amount of available electrons. If the bit of the data is encoded by a state of the material object object it is easily considered under the formula log 2 (N) where N - an amount of perceptible states. A logarithm, of course, terribly lazy function. Titanic efforts powerfully improved technology and magnification of it N twice, and what achieved? Received a scoring in 1 shameful bit. Fie. But it is not necessary to forget that the logarithm of fair infinity is equal to fair infinity. So if to find fair infinity, and to it to stick, the task bottomless appears solved. Very much that is measured in the physicist by real numbers. Some values, of course, not is fair real number. For example, an electrical charge. There all rests against an electron charge. But even if to discard all not the presents rial-nambery, all the same there will be still an abyss of the presents. It can frighten a little bit, but the material world is that that in its any small trifle sits and impudently to us the infinite variety grins. Now we are not able to place it to us in the service, but there are no fundamental reasons for that, as henceforth never can. S> for any other particles there will be the same or is worse - the main ratios are saved. About quanta and uncertainty I know. But this uncertainty even if it really is a sentence not subject to the appeal (now it in the status beautiful, repeatedly checked up, but nevertheless hypotheses), works with all rigidity inherent in it only on those objects for which it is formulated. To us forbade to know simultaneously pulse and particle position? , we will not be. At once three variants and the law to observe, and a candy to eat: 1. And the hell with him, with position. Absolutely not interesting. Let it will be "plus-minus infinity". We will be hooked to pulse and there how many not laziness. 2. And the hell with him, with pulse. Let it will be any. In that side even we will not look. We will be an occurrence. 3. And the hell with them, with positions and pulses of particles. On particles there are other fish in the sea. There are things, to which quantum theory any side not . For example, gravitation. Meanwhile all attempts to marry quanta with gravitation with a crash failed. Whether instead of gravitation? Or, if with it too does not grow together, something else? The quantum theory - an outstanding piece. Eventually, it is extreme of the microcosmos physics, simultaneously possessing both property , and property of usefulness. Standard, for example, model of subatomic particles though and forged, but on the practical level certainly useless. And the string theory - so that simultaneously both useless, and not checked. But it is necessary to understand that the quantum theory - it is exact not the history end. Those professional physicists-theorists with whom remained though a droplet of intellectual honesty, recognize that they do not have any worthy explanation to that fact that the photon climbs at once through two holes. The scholastic approach "here the formula which works and which should be learned" - not for serious boys. A situation really ridiculous. At me on a nose the instrument exploiting wave properties of photons (points), but the world science has no that any distinct understanding as such generally can work. Officially recognized open question. A problem? Yes in any time not a problem. The task. - - - - generally, a little bit thinking, came to a conclusion that actually in bottomless storage to use really any. Having capacious enough (petabytes) storage and limitation of throughput of the interface, it is possible to imitate easily by means of hash functions unlimited address space. Probability of that somebody sometime reveals fraud, is small. The real need to store infinitely many bit appears if to learn only to operate with the data of the infinite digit capacity. At least them to add. It gives at once precedent of the infinite computing power, which it is possible to think how to use. It is really basic other computing technology. And from forgetting about a problem of shortage of a place on a hard, any considerably delightful vau-effect to receive it does not turn out.