1

Topic: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Prompt, please, to what criterion of quality to carry following property of the program: on the code the behavior of the executor of the code and on the contrary is easy to predict possibility, on behavior it is easy to find a place in the code by which the given behavior is caused. Traceability? (And still, can, prompt the standard gradation by criteria. I need to take something for a basis for comparing by these criteria of two )

2

Re: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Hello, _hum _, you wrote: __> (And still, can, prompt the standard gradation by criteria. I need to take something for a basis for comparing by these criteria of two ) Frejmvorki by absolutely other criteria compare. And estimations use weighed with the combo registration "probability that is required + consequences". In general all the same control of risks, only in a profile. If, of course, speech about the real project, instead of about course / the diploma

3

Re: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Hello, _hum _, you wrote: __> Prompt, please, to what criterion of quality to carry following property of the program: __> on the code the behavior of the executor of the code and on the contrary is easy to predict possibility, on behavior it is easy to find a place in the code by which the given behavior is caused. Traceability? If in Russian: the First - probably and will be - predictability. The second - maintainability, ease of debugging?

4

Re: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Hello, Sinix, you wrote: S> Hello, _hum _, you wrote: __>> (And still, can, prompt the standard gradation by criteria. I need to take something for a basis for comparing by these criteria of two ) S> Frejmvorki by absolutely other criteria compare. And estimations use weighed with the combo registration "probability that is required + consequences". S> in general all the same control of risks, only in a profile. On what another? And at what here risks, after all speech not about choice decision-making  under a specific target (with estimations of risk of such decision), and it is simple about comparing (advantages/prosperities by the selected criteria).

5

Re: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> Hello, _hum _, you wrote: __>> Prompt, please, to what criterion of quality to carry following property of the program: __>> on the code the behavior of the executor of the code and on the contrary is easy to predict possibility, on behavior it is easy to find a place in the code by which the given behavior is caused. Traceability? A> if in Russian: A> the First - probably and will be - predictability. Something I such do not find in wiki/Software_quality A> the Second - maintainability, ease of debugging? Not, probably, not absolutely. Not about , and about possibility it is easy to correlate speech that is written, and that actually happens. For example, if speech about control of the manipulator the algorithm written on block diagrams, it is easy to correlate with how there is a process of operation of this manipulator, and here written in the functional language - is already more difficult

6

Re: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Hello, _hum _, you wrote: __> on what another? Well, at first it is necessary to be defined, for what it is sampled. For a victory in  criteria will be one, for the project - others, for the company - absolutely the third. __> speech... Simply about comparing (advantages/prosperities by the selected criteria). And such  interests nobody. There is no unambiguous answer "A better B" which would approach for any project / commands. Pretty often happens so that the ideal candidate does not transit because of small nuance (for example, the author hammered on support, is not on friendly terms with other libraries or in essence spreads the project only in source codes, and without tests). All these jambs / should be estimated bottlenecks, and to estimate with the registration of chances to run and with consequences from "well, did not carry". Control of risks, as well as it has been told

7

Re: To what criterion of quality of the program to carry

Hello, Sinix, you wrote: S> Hello, _hum _, you wrote: __>> speech... Simply about comparing (advantages/prosperities by the selected criteria). S> And such  interests nobody. There is no unambiguous answer "A better B" which would approach for any project / commands. About, . And two points on a plane it is impossible to compare, but it does not mean that it is impossible to compare their coordinates it seems, found, that is necessary: ISO/IEC 25010:2011 (en) Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models