Hello, Michael Romanov, you wrote: > Well here to tell the truth, the first sentence causes vigilance in me: Well so vigilance, instead of desire to do outputs of universal scale to a basis "a subject I do not own, it is pleasant - means truly" in section about formation Here after all as: problems are known for all - the last class at school do not learn and train on , the first course in high school do not learn, and transit the school program. But to suffer a hogwash fifteen years and then it is opened in it to admit somehow , therefore went a difficult way. Unified State Examinations smoothly-smoothly transform from the test reversely into examination. The part And is on the sly removed, questions on the sly become less formal, but the general absurdity of questions of type learn a temple on a photo of the tsar or delirium from separate checking "usage of words-synonyms regarding B it is inadmissible" does not remove. With natural sciences it more or less works, with humanitarian - it is clear as. That complicates a situation even more - the system turned out very fragile in respect of quality: any change of the general circuit sharply worsens estimations, the elementary example - a bit complicated ege-2014 on the mathematician and followed on a subject "your children became sillier" vs "your questions became difficult", refer to "Unified State Examination-sediment". Well and total "you to us the experiments spoil indexes" does not promote fast changes. In general all agree what to change something it is necessary, but fifteen years of attempts still something to change in system of the average general education without the decision actually problems hunting to change something generally beat off. Therefore changes will be, crying on "to formation which we lost" will be, any positive changes if will be, at a distant day. Provided that do not throw left unfinished on the middle.