Hello, Sinix, you wrote: Give I will explain. S> Ugu-ugu, professional certificates instead of interviews and industrial release of experts at courses of improvement of qualification completely confirms your judgement As soon as all start to pay for the errors in the most valuable that is - money at once appears since if the commission took today in HIGH SCHOOL of the person on the grant (which the HIGH SCHOOL should pay) and it did not justify waitings - the HIGH SCHOOL loses money. , the grant should be produced on irrevocable conditions, but it can withdraw, for example. S> S> It is necessary to think and make corrections that high schools, especially high schools very difficult, socially significant high schools, should have entering written examinations, without it it is impossible. S>... S> By words Vasilevoj, now in high schools goes to the first semester "" high school programs. S> to receive the start message. Give also it we consider. Look, on mine a problem it not a problem of examinations, and a problem of the program of training both at school, and in HIGH SCHOOL. The first, they are not transparent, the second they is basic not . I understand As a transparency the full availability of the information on course (a subject at school): the amount of hours, knowledge necessary for passages of course and, the most important, knowledge which receives the last course the student. Still I would add here the list of references on which the course and is constructed. In each subject it is necessary to hold testing and examination, but final test at release from school to leave in the form of Unified State Examination and to force to accept its all high schools. On this system it is possible to construct and in specific schools about activity of specific teachers from high school and finally to bring an attention to the question on the most important in life - how many money it to pay, probably to raise the question about improvement of professional skill or methodology change. You after all took courses on or ? There there is an information both on the teacher, and on knowledge which are necessary for course passage. The second - synchronization which follows from 1. Now on a difference between level of the first-year student and schools gain money (or did once), in my opinion it is that other as one of types of corruption and it should be liquidated, for example, entering measures which I described in 1 or Unified State Examination and the uniform standard for graduates. Probably, it makes sense 2-3 profound profile courses which it is possible to select to students at 10-11 classes, but they should teach at all schools and answer item 1. What offers again he creates the market of preliminary courses and corruption ", courses? . Then to it for examination, and operation we it on-that-rja ow that did not dispute" if contest generally is possible.