26

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, Ikemefula, you wrote: S>> the Basic possibilities to refine productivity within the limits of the same transistor budget full, but all of them break about small nuance: compatibility. I> not compatibility, and physics laws. For example one only heat removal hinders to put in a crystal at once all successively as offers the HARDWARE. Pinholes, as a variant. A theoretical store  to watt of thermal capacity from sm 2. I> I how many looked this "a quite good educational program", and did not understand: I> 1 as works STM If guts interest most easier to begin with here this pair of presentations https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/ar … mpl-1.pptx + https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/ar … reII.pptx, further only Google on specific questions. I> 2 why passage from pictures-children at once to Haskelju it is quite good Because all remaining even worse.

27

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, gardener, you wrote: I>> Roughly speaking, in volume unit you can  only  an amount of devices. It means that different devices will communicate all the same on the general bus. From here it is clear that this bus and will be a bottleneck. G> the remark. The general buses already are not present. In rough approximation a matrix. The matrix too will not manage to be made the arbitrary capacity, and that your computer would consist of only one videocard

28

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: Pzz>> Because the more transistors, the probability there is more that any of them it turns out rejected. If  too difficult, the output of suitable crystals is too small. And as in the price of the suitable the price unsuitable is put also, suitable will cost the expensive. S> so... It is possible hardly to increase the size of the transistor, not to try to make the smallest. Well if the crystal is 100*100*5 mm - unless it much? Into any notebook gets. I congratulate, you invented the microcontroller.

29

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, Ikemefula, you wrote: I> 3 time of switching of the transistor is restricted by properties of the semiconductor it not especially terrible problem, there is already  on 1  a problem in complexity  - namely in that   in circuits is connected sequentially and still already spoke, but on frequency only 1 GHz current pulse transits only 30 sm and on 10 GHz - 3 sm - here it already grief real

30

Re: New way for development of processors

S> in general, a processor small square/crystal very small. And the case big. It is possible to increase a crystal of times in 1000 minimum and if to make in some layers - that in some millions times. Good luck to make a photolithography many-storeyed transistors. S> to increase an amount of transistors to trillion and more. The output of suitable technologies at present level will aspire to zero, and the cost price  working copies - to infinity. S> what for? And to build in directly the processor of ten cache gigabyte + to implement units for specific algorithms. For example to implement it is hardware all algorithms of cryptography, search, sorting and so forth the Hardware cryptography already is, where it is required. Hardware sorting/search are not necessary in general purpose systems as predicates are necessary , and hardware sorting with  a predicate will be not strong faster the completely  analog. For all remaining cases for a long time use COTTON VELVET. S> And such architecture does not lead to magnification of capacity of the processor - the necessary units can be included and disconnected on demand.  I did not see that  storage units included/switched off in notebooks. And after all could spare it pair-triple watt in idle time. S> why yet did not go on this way? At least some  are made on SoC with storage onboard.

31

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, ononim, you wrote: S>> to Increase an amount of transistors to trillion and more. O> the Output of suitable technologies at present level will aspire to zero, and the cost price  working copies - to infinity. Means is where to grow That is not all possibilities for growth are settled. S>> what for? And to build in directly the processor of ten cache gigabyte + to implement units for specific algorithms. For example to implement it is hardware all algorithms of cryptography, search, sorting and so forth O> the Hardware cryptography already is, where it is required. Hardware sorting/search are not necessary in general purpose systems as predicates are necessary , and hardware sorting with  a predicate will be not strong faster the completely  analog. For all remaining cases for a long time use COTTON VELVET. Most likely a problem in that that while technically not probably to implement that that I I want. And here algorithms are. It is possible also neural networks  in a crystal. S>> And such architecture does not lead to magnification of capacity of the processor - the necessary units can be included and disconnected on demand. O> Chtoto I did not see that  storage units included/switched off in notebooks. And after all could spare it pair-triple watt in idle time. And could make. After all technically it is possible.

32

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Who will use these algorithms from an existing software? Primitives AES-NI, for example, already are now used hardly less, than all... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

33

Re: New way for development of processors

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> in general, a processor small square/crystal very small. And the case big. It is possible to increase a crystal of times in 1000 minimum and if to make in some layers - that in some millions times. To increase an amount of transistors to trillion and more. We present programming team from 8 persons whom allowed to make the project for 3 years. And here if to employ 8000 persons they make the project for 1 day.