Hello, Dym On, you wrote: DO> Article from site N+1, by the way, a good site with qualitative , I recommend. DO> Platon the friend, but trues it is not necessary to me DO> Letters rather much, therefore before to write full of indignation the answer to this message, all the same read up up to the end and think. Our forum of the Politician will be a good illustration to this article. Normal article. But the subject is not uncovered. Yes, occasionally people ignore the facts. Possibly, now it happens more often than it happened earlier. More interesting question - in what the reason? People became sillier? It is improbable. Or today people react to emotional descriptions more strongly? ... Precisely is not present! The reason as it seems to me, that people changed the relation to the facts. They started to understand modern . Especially the facts from mass-media. Today all it is clear that everyone mass-media prejudicedly and sounds the point of view of its owner. The facts steal up the corresponding. Opponents if are present that certainly feeble. , many people began to reach that one-two fact presented to mass-media no means always show an event essence . Therefore people simply cease to trust the facts. Who that is not happy with the current prezedentom \mayor \manager a warehouse. Also what? And how many all dissatisfied? And how many the happy? And how counted? And why asked only striking on the area? Same a systematic error of the survived. What it is possible to tell on one, three, five hundreds dissatisfied without knowing anything about a complete sample and a method of selection of the interrogated? Statistical analysis methods all enter in normal citizens even not not knowing about a sigma and Gausa more strongly. And it is very good. In the modern society this "home statistic analysis" is more effective than logic constructed on the facts.