Hello, pestis, you wrote: P> It is possible, why it is impossible. P> 1. Programming languages. With rare exception type of a C and Lisp from the modern point of view it is a pitch gloom. Algol, Kobol, the BASIC, the Hell, the Fortran That with the Fortran and Kobolom not so? Till now are quite successfully used. The people are informed on a rake, in them present. The software written on the Fortran and Kobole, works as decades. Till now it is actively sawn. The nightmare is PL/1. So it now in few places is used. The author of a subject now comes and tells that I am wrong. P> 2. Standards. Almost all of them , , are unreasoned and unsuitable for . It is Enough to recall ASN1, teletypes, a G-code and RFC epoch of "paper letters". However, these "unsuitable" for some reason implemented. And how it was necessary? At once to do the 128-bit address for TCP/IP? P> 3. A software. All inconvenient and unreasoned from the point of view of architecture. It is enough to recall RCS, P-CAD, M4, sh, ed and generally unix. It if inside not to look and if to glance there at the best structured programming, and noodles from goto are faster. And how it was necessary? What software thought over from the point of view of architecture? P> 4. Concepts centralized , mainframes, supercomputers, architecture it is horror flying. And what alternative? P> 5. The approach to project management naive, one only printout of source codes on a paper for archive, without speaking already about in log. To read "Mythical cheloveko-month" to an enlightenment.