1

Topic: Re: whether to Spread articles?

2

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

3

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > And  and RSDN all the same as Spartak and CSKA too flatter estimation, IMHO. More likely, so:  - it is more popular, but a contingent... Better article becomes dusty in RSDN-nnyh , than the author about ***  from feet to a head   with  brains.

4

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> It is possible to lay out in Science and education. There briskly enough. And links to deliver in subject forums. Any official position concerning log would be interesting all the same. Or "died so died" or that it there.

5

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

6

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

7

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

As the variant - can be labeled in md and to lay out on .

8

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > In my opinion - the log was bent, Well as though log covers on principal for 2007 densely hint at it

9

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > I too so thought. But "it is inconvenient before  Pedro". Perhaps just new number with this article now quits > And  and RSDN all the same as Spartak and CSKA

10

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > the Cover for 2007 - pure sloppiness of masters of a site.  and

11

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > I looked at a profile of Kupaeva - it was marked the last time two months ago, means that the domain was replaced, knows. The last number which has been laid out here, No1 for 2015 and that, for some reason only from one (?!) articles. Vlad is regularly marked - it is possible to ask it

12

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, pestis, you wrote: P> For example, on . It is better on  then than at these .... <<RSDN@Home 1.1.4 stable SR1 rev. 568>>

13

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > I Was intersected with one week ago with the author writing articles in RSDN-magazine. He complained to me that a month four from edition (it is is specific from M.Kupaeva) neither to hearing, nor spirit. And at it, at the author, remained from articles for a long time already written and sent a small group, which roofing felts are not accepted, roofing felts are not so necessary, roofing felts even are printed, but anywhere (in elibrary.ru, here) are not laid out. And logs, naturally, nobody delivers authors. And even that article has been published, nobody informs Unfortunately, the paper log is final died. So professional reading, unfortunately, any more will not be. Articles imposed in our template, it is possible to send on moderator@rsdn.org or vlad@rsdn.org. As it is possible to issue article a post in a suitable forum and to write about it on the same moderator@rsdn.org or vlad@rsdn.org and we add these messages in a tree of articles and we give in news. Still, as a variant to write to blogs  forums and besides to send links for layout in a tree.

14

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

15

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > it is good, understood, all I will transfer it. But a small question: it is speech about new articles, and old not printed articles after all and remained in edition? And on kupaev@rsdn.org you to it tried to write? > well and the last number too lay out everything, please. We try.

16

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > Thanks. All the same the log was quite good. Can be even was also the best "in the class" Well, unfortunately authors it was reduced also we started to pass releases. On were passed almost year. As a result subscribers simply left. And on its handling money is necessary. We and so pressed close as could. Well, yes we will adjust the direct publication.

17

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, , you wrote: > I Was intersected with one week ago with the author writing articles in RSDN-magazine. He complained to me that a month four from edition (it is is specific from M.Kupaeva) neither to hearing, nor spirit. And at it, at the author, remained from articles for a long time already written and sent a small group, which roofing felts are not accepted, roofing felts are not so necessary, roofing felts even are printed, but anywhere (in elibrary.ru, here) are not laid out. And logs, naturally, nobody delivers authors. And even that article has been published, nobody informs > in general, it these transferred me 9 articles and suggested them to lay out at forums, time I here . For many the log and a site is same... > Though, can that with Kupaevym happens? Anything especial with Kupaevym does not happen, besides, that it already for a long time does not work in RSDN Magazine. Articles all not at me, it, more likely, to Vlad - because I in edition do not happen now, and all materials, certainly, there.

18

Re: Re: whether to Spread articles?

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Hello, , you wrote: >> In my opinion - the log was bent, S> Well as though log covers on principal for 2007 densely hint at it They so return 2007