1

Topic: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Classical J. Richter. Windows for professionals. Creation of effective WIN32-appendices taking into account specificity of 64-digit Windows version is executed 15 years. What the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10 are? Or those died out, how a class?

2

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, dwebster, you wrote: D> Classical D> J. Richter. Windows for professionals. Creation of effective WIN32-appendices taking into account specificity of 64-digit Windows version D> is executed 15 years. D> what there are the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10? Richter's fresher issuing is called "Windows Via a C/C ++ 5th Edition", but all the same too old to include Windows 10

3

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Windows Internals too it is quite reprinted, judging by search

4

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, Alexander G, you wrote: AG> Windows Internals too it is quite reprinted, judging by search In February there will be a first volume 7 issuings.

5

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

D> What there are the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10? D> Or those died out, how a class?  regularly writes on this subject. However, passed on C# (and earlier about WinAPI wrote...) For example, for 8 book it was translated: http://www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/23773674/

6

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: D>> What there are the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10? D>> Or those died out, how a class? LVV> Pettsold regularly writes on this subject. LVV> However, passed on C# (and earlier about WinAPI wrote...) LVV> For example, for 8 book it was translated: http://www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/23773674/ That's it, passed. Looked its this book, any continuous XML, does not interest.

7

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, dwebster, you wrote: D> Classical D> J. Richter. Windows for professionals. Creation of effective WIN32-appendices taking into account specificity of 64-digit Windows version D> is executed 15 years. D> what there are the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10? D> Or those died out, how a class? Perhaps who writes? LaptevVV, here, on pluses the book wrote.

8

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, dwebster, you wrote: D> What there are the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10? D> Or those died out, how a class? Died out. In this area with books absolutely deafly years 10 as.

9

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

D> Or those died out, how a class? And what in WinAPI there were what that new sections for learning? Or serious changes?

10

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: D>> Or those died out, how a class? T> and what in WinAPI there were what that new sections for learning? Or serious changes? In chess of 1500 of serious changes was not, nevertheless books on chess quit regularly.

11

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

D> In chess of 1500 of serious changes was not, nevertheless books on chess quit regularly. In chess continue to play, probably therefore and write new books.

12

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: D>> In chess of 1500 of serious changes was not, nevertheless books on chess quit regularly. T> in chess continue to play, probably therefore and write new books. And to develop applications under Windows already ceased? Ah yes, it is possible after all to be wrapped in fashionable WPF, JS and XML and to forget about Win32, architecture of OS, optimization and algorithms. It makes all. But even if there is such desire, it is no means always possible. , antiviruses, something working with system or simply critical to performance and resources.

13

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

D>> Or those died out, how a class? T> and what in WinAPI there were what that new sections for learning? Or serious changes? Darkness of the new. To search truth for the information it became much more difficult than earlier.

14

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

D> What there are the modern good books on Win API via With ++ (not.NET), taking into account specificity Windows 10? There is a section in MSDN - Windows and Windows Server compatibility cookbook: Windows 10, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012, and Windows Server 2012 R2 And in the same place there are documents: Windows 10 Compatibility Cookbook Windows and Windows Server compatibility cookbook: Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 From section above (What's new) it is possible to look also: Windows 7 Technologies Windows 8 and 8.1 Technologies

15

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

T>> And what in WinAPI there were what that new sections for learning? Or serious changes? Tom> darkness of the new. To search truth for the information it became much more difficult than earlier. For example?

16

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

D> And to develop applications under Windows already ceased? Who got in web, and who on Qt, remaining on WPF. D> But even if there is such desire, it is no means always possible. , antiviruses, something working with system or simply critical to performance and resources. Bearded uncles from 90 are still live also all dig out that is necessary in system.

17

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

T> For example? For example that. Whence to me the nobility on what version you stopped

18

Re: That new to esteem on WinAPI

Tom> For example that. Whence to me the nobility on what version you stopped set an example from the latest.