Hello, Fantasist, you wrote: F> But for some reason a shadow share in the legal goods and services less. It is impossible to tell about what was shadow. The Netherlands had an experience with drugs, not so successful. F> and at all I do not understand, why sex it is immoral. If at you the mistress, you contain it and have with it sex - that it, type normally and if sometimes only to it you pay immediately for sex it is already immoral. Why it generally is immoral? Immorally, because among people long monogamous relations are accepted. It is the evolutionary biology substantiated including mathematics. And including besides remaining aspects - there is an aspect of venereal diseases why whores always drove. It too the veiled prostitution and, for example, normal healthy feminism (and he happens - yes-yes) - condemns such relations. And, suddenly, now too it is condemned ", the whore, " is all epithets with which award such lady naturally. F> but sex by it is not. Though shadow prostitution increases risk to health and life. Morally, from this point of view, would be to take care of people and to make their legal, to reduce their risks. Legal does not reduce risks, whence this nonsense? To reduce risks it is necessary, that the prostitute after each contact made tests and waited. To reduce risks it is necessary to forbid prostitutes rendering of services without condoms and other perversions - Russian on it do not go at all for to whom they become necessary? You instead suggest to legalize even more to kindle epidemic and to promote morals lowering. Perhaps suffices?