Hello, IncremenTop, you wrote: IT> it is immoral, because among people long monogamous relations are accepted. It is the evolutionary biology substantiated including mathematics. And including besides remaining aspects - there is an aspect of venereal diseases why whores always drove. It bosh. Polygamy quite works for Moslems. Diseases is a unique reasonable argument. Now is is not subject to control. You will wind something on - that and remains what to damn yourself while others from the same woman to themselves wind. IT> it too the veiled prostitution and, for example, normal healthy feminism (and he happens - yes-yes) - condemns such relations. And, suddenly, now too it is condemned ", the whore, " is all epithets with which award such lady naturally. About "" - , of course, but it is normal from those is audible, who not on sucked/and F>> but sex by it is not. Though shadow prostitution increases risk to health and life. Morally, from this point of view, would be to take care of people and to make their legal, to reduce their risks. IT> legal does not reduce risks, whence this nonsense? Whence your nonsense, tell? then tubas clinics and the registration in them, the loony clinics and the registration in them, and ? If it does not reduce risks? IT> to reduce risks it is necessary, that the prostitute after each contact made tests and waited. You to zero risks want to reduce it. At least once a month makes tests - and that is good. Better, than years without analyses to distribute gifts IT> to reduce risks it is necessary to forbid prostitutes rendering of services without condoms and other perversions - Russian on it do not go at all for to whom they become necessary? And you already became on the Russian prostitutes and on what they are ready? IT> you instead suggest to legalize even more to kindle epidemic and to promote morals lowering. Perhaps suffices? And can to you suffices? Well, to be engaged in what it is not necessary to you ?