151

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> Hello, ylp, you wrote: ylp>> punishment Presence for  and rapes reduces number of murders and rapes. Vi2> resolution of murders and rapes also lowers their number because there will be no murders and rapes. These are crimes for which prohibitions work there is no possibility  profitable business on murders and rapes and not to be , giving to whom it is necessary bribes. Would be not so - there would be for a long time a shadow business and talk would be absolutely another.

152

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, ylp, you wrote: E>> Well, and then at labor exchange you oblige to go to work , it is good, if at least heterosexual ylp> before  these horror stories, look, as the labor exchange in Germany where prostitution is legal works. Also clarify, at last, that it is propaganda bosh. I of nothing , truth any time lived in Germany... But here it is much more important not, but that I found the USSR and its disorder. And perfectly I remember that to the engineer, for example, said that it the sucker, time still in  did not go. And here that the sucker as still in  did not go, nevertheless did not speak... Now speak about bombed, by the way. And legal  is a taxi,  there everyone and . And the people in  mass asses go  on expensive wheelbarrows. And if will be  and there it is necessary to go when the wheelbarrow breaks...

153

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, susumanin, you wrote: S> Once again: there is a mass of researches speaking about that that among men of times married at least changed from 30 % to 60 %. What does this statement mean? What 45 % +-15 %? Or something other? To me, for example, at least, apparently, that the percent will depend very much on the country, time and social group... S> New determination of monogamous relations: it is married, you live and you bring up children with one, and you bang - another? I correctly caught? He says that many people can have long steady sex. Relations only from one partners during one time frame. Then the partner can exchange, but again there will be one, except for the search period when there will be trial communications. Type such model. And children there, spoilage and . , to this business are parallel.

154

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Erop, you wrote: E> Hello, ylp, you wrote: E>>> Well, and then at labor exchange you oblige to go to work , it is good, if at least heterosexual ylp>> before  these horror stories, look, as the labor exchange in Germany where prostitution is legal works. Also clarify, at last, that it is propaganda bosh. E> and if will be  and there it is necessary to go when the wheelbarrow breaks... I once again speak - it is not necessary to dream, look at the countries where prostitution is already legal. There anything them that you describe, does not happen. And if the person does not have money and the unique chance to earn is  to trade in own body, no prohibition of prostitution stops it. Sm, for example, Thailand.

155

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: D>> 5. D>> And it not is mandatory program K> the come in large numbers whores from 1.5. Thus it is not necessary to be strained also regional ohms will not be. Nonsense. From 3000 in an hour per Moscow, also it is fierce crocodiles!!!! D>> not crocodiles stand from 15 at an o'clock. K> well it does not correspond to true. Try at a leisure and do not tell nonsenses. I just tried that much, therefore unlike you theorists I tell as is Beautiful from 15 at an o'clock begin. And that you there from a hopelessness bang that I about it I will not begin to spoil a term even if to me pay

156

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Demandred, you wrote: D> I just tried that much, therefore unlike you theorists I tell as is D> Beautiful from 15 at an o'clock begin. D> and that you there from a hopelessness bang that I about it I will not begin to spoil a term even if to me pay Well are not present, it is a lie simply. Certainly, the more expensively, the better, but is beautiful and for 3-5. However, for such price normally long do not keep, either dads assort, or dump.

157

Re: Down with souteneurs

D> Nonsense. From 3000 in an hour per Moscow, also it is fierce crocodiles!!!! A pancake. I not and that in course that for one and a half it is possible to find in Moscow. Not on  it is finite And crocodiles or not allocation about such as in the street D> I just tried that much, therefore unlike you theorists I tell as is D> Beautiful from 15 at an o'clock begin. Well if you the fan of silicone and , are possible But it does not mean that they beautiful D> And that that you there from a hopelessness bang I about it I will not begin to spoil a term even if to me pay Speaks about your experience

158

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K>> Under desktop on foot walked - too variant P> you Want to tell, what it - young can remove also normal little girls, and to us at solid age without prostitutes already in any way? As that as. But more and more through . And I  not about anal sex. Yes  to speak. On  look. Generally with Blacks it is necessary it. And there is confidence no it they love or its grandmas

159

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, ylp, you wrote: ylp> I once again speak - it is not necessary to dream, look at the countries where prostitution is already legal. There anything them that you describe, does not happen. I do not dream. I impart experience. In it a difference

160

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Erop, you wrote: E> To me, for example, at least, apparently, that the percent will depend very much on the country, time and social group... In a greater degree from testosterone level.

161

Re: Down with souteneurs

IT> You really consider ,  as competitors to the criminal world? IT> really you consider doctors as competitors ? We tell so, with the first category it was necessary to deal with an informal bias. That competitors as soon as speech about access to money of victims comes.

162

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, antropolog, you wrote: A> except favourable/is unprofitable to eat and other criteria of true at people. For example morals. The morals were invented by souteneurs of a bottom to cut money with... Parishioners.

163

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Well look that turns out: Well and? S> 1. Your daughter can legally be arranged with the prostitute (on reaching 18 years). And your neighbors, laughing, will be to you and to your wife regularly to tell as they it had. You can make nothing - all legally. Yes, indeed. And that in it of bad? You start with sending that the daughter - YOURS. But the daughter on reaching 18th years not yours. It is a separate person. And its mutual relations with you, other people and a society - its private affair, not yours. If it likes to be the prostitute and it to it is is its choice. Your business to accept it or not. S> 2. The spoilage institute can break up generally. Yes, can. And can and is not present. The part of people will live in strong families because they want it. A part - to hand over children in children's homes. Concerning them something will work like natural selection. In due course either those, or these get advantage and more comprehensible system will be selected. S> children in it is put. The house or houses where it is possible to come and with them to be played, satisfy a parent instinct. At someone the instinct will be stronger also they leave children. It will be possible their advantage. Probably - is not present. S> And wives will be considered as the phenomenon become outdated - after all the woman can receive money for sex, and legally. Yes, so. And besides. That in it of bad? It at least will be fair. Now de facto even in families many husbands periodically pay to wives for sex. Realize that at many men (and at me too, by the way) understandably, caused by evolution ( a competition) bombs from that realization that "your" female has the legitimate right to go and couple with everybody. Including being married. And that you can make the only thing - to suspend relations. If it is spoilage - that much that you will lose in the material sense. In this section prostitution - much more fair piece. And much cheaper than spoilage. S> If you such clever - write the vision of morals that is good that badly and all of us together laugh. By the way, it is possible to laugh directly over this sending ^^^. "That is good that badly" is explained in a poem "that such well and that such is bad". But to morals it is relations has no.

164

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Erop, you wrote: E> Hello, ylp, you wrote: ylp>> I once again speak - it is not necessary to dream, look at the countries where prostitution is already legal. There anything them that you describe, does not happen. E> I do not dream. I impart experience. In it a difference you dream. Experience in the necessary area at you is not present. And that your "experience" we apply in a considered situation - imaginations and is.

165

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, ylp, you wrote: E>> I do not dream. I impart experience. In it a difference ylp> you dream. Experience in the necessary area at you is not present. And that your "experience" we apply in a considered situation - imaginations and is. And what for area here the necessary? Type I prostitution not  type? Because in conditions when people with burning eyes came and in interests of absolutely other people started all to break and say that know, how it is necessary, I lived...

166

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, susumanin, you wrote: S> these Researches - with one place eat. Digits in them, by the way, are underestimated, since a great lot to the people not strongly likes to tell about it thanking itself know to whom. Men are inclined to uprate, women to underestimate. Verifiable sources with representative samplings give in the core to 20 % that is surprising during an epoch of sexual revolution and proves that the majority of people are monogamous. S> new determination of monogamous relations: it is married, you live and you bring up children with one, and you bang - another? I correctly caught? This old. If the person has only one sexual partner is a serial monogamy. S> yes a heap of researches, you take first Teenagers, aha. I too had a first sex in 12 when to me was 18. S> I Wait for a verifiable source that the person this monogamous animal. The principal verifiable source is, suddenly, current practice in the majority of the countries. But time very much would be desirable, here, for example, including dataful genetics: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12962309

167

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, IncremenTop, you wrote: IT> Men are inclined to uprate, women to underestimate. There do not ask how many time, whether the first question was generally. All are just inclined to underestimate, for morals. IT> verifiable sources with representative samplings give in the core to 20 % that is surprising during an epoch of sexual revolution and proves that the majority of people are monogamous. And it is not so surprising if to consider presence of morals and possible consequences. Read that when ask "if there was a possibility to have sex on the side and anybody never about it would learn" - "yes" speaks to 80 % of both floors. IT> this old. If the person has only one sexual partner is a serial monogamy. Yes is not present, "a serial monogamy" this tender title of polygamy. Besides, what moralists not so it was strong badly. IT> teenagers, aha. I too had a first sex in 12 when to me was 18. Well you somehow this, try to read: following a group of adolescents in 1994 into adulthood. They found that a quarter of married and cohabiting young men and women reported that either they, IT> the Principal verifiable source is, suddenly, current practice in the majority of the countries. Current practice in the majority of the developed countries, suddenly, - legalization of prostitution and overlaying big and thick on moralists. Likely, it because all monogamous. IT> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12962309 well i.e. the most part of the history the person was polygamous and only the last 10-5 thousand years we have "shift" towards a monogamy caused by change of a way of life?

168

Re: Down with souteneurs

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> 1. Your daughter can legally be arranged with the prostitute (on reaching 18 years). And your neighbors, laughing, will be to you and to your wife regularly to tell as they it had. You can make nothing - all legally. Whether reduces this amount of your sufferings? The prostitute not the slave. She can agree, can refuse. If the girl has no anything against to oversleep with the neighbor, it is optional to it to it to get a job the prostitute. She solves, with whom to sleep, instead of parents. S> 2. The spoilage institute can break up generally. Children in it is put. The house or houses where it is possible to come and with them to be played, satisfy a parent instinct. And wives will be considered as the phenomenon become outdated - after all the woman can receive money for sex, and legally. Perhaps on the contrary becomes less divorces - c those who marries not for the sake of love, a family and children and that the head with whom to fuck was not ill.