51

Re: Choice of a cheap car

Hello, the Smith, you wrote: I Want to take the car. Big  I do not allocate, therefore the choice is insignificant, here the list that it would be possible to take:  (loaf/goat), Volga (31022 or 31029), the Harmony (quadruple or something close), the Field. Assignment while very simple - to go on operation (30 minutes in one side, daily except days off), well and on trifles - the shop, can nearby go to any sudden affairs (on any concourse, principal here that the way near, moving of the long-range plan is not planned absolutely). In respect of passengers - that it was possible to take 1-2 passengers, dogs while are not present, children small I will not carry also (if only the emergency situation, but is a special case). The comfort is not important absolutely (for such money of it to think strange). The budget, we tell so - more 100 precisely is not ready to take (and I do not possess while such total, but I do not hasten, it is possible to wait till the spring), if at 40-60 to go in, it will be excellent, just on initiating repair there will be money, and further in process of arrival of problems will already understand. VAZ front-wheel (the Guelder-rose, the Grant, 2110), only  I would increase a little...

52

Re: Choice of a cheap car

Hello, Denwer, you wrote: D> What 3.58, on a gazelle even 3.9 from factory did not put (on a sable can be). From factory on a gazelle put 5.1 and 4.55. With  3.58 and with a load a gazelle to go that cannot. That that can be delivered, it is clear, is not eliminated that there will be even  back pair which approaches. 3.58 also there is "" principal pair, was put on  with  an engine. It was produced too Crystler Corporation. In  it is put perfectly - considered a marriage variant  with front final drives of tractor -40. Absolutely wonderful bridge on durability turns out. IID>>>> brake a support - identical. D>>> here I do not remember, but it is a little trusted, after all radiuses of brake disks the different. IID>> you do not remember, and I 3 years with these supports . On Oise. Then decided to throw out VAZOVSKY a support from the back bridge (sour) and to deliver  round. Which proved to be excellently. And being afraid  on the front bridge made . The faceplates, allowing to deliver at once 2 supports on a wheel. Yet did not test. D> yes and here ? It is possible to deliver much that and anywhere. The question that is put in the car from factory. Selected.  here besides that these of a support I not simply know and felt, I under them invented faceplates.

53

Re: Choice of a cheap car

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> 3.58 also there is "" principal pair, was put on  with  an engine. It was produced too Crystler Corporation. In  it is put perfectly - considered a marriage variant  with front final drives of tractor -40. Absolutely wonderful bridge on durability turns out. By the way, can sound the budget of all  alterations that  approximately understood, what for it waits? One million is already?

54

Re: Choice of a cheap car

Hello, __ kot2, you wrote: __> by the way, can sound the budget of all  alterations that  approximately understood, what for it waits? One million is already? One million was  at the rate of 30 roubles. Only and here the HARDWARE? I do not offer it , and furthermore tuning. Tuning it is always expensive. Take an interest, for example, how many in yours  there is a kastom-bridge on fate-kraulingovuju a cutlet.

55

Re: Choice of a cheap car

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> One million was  at the rate of 30 roubles. IID> only and here the HARDWARE? I do not offer it , and furthermore tuning. Tuning it is always expensive. Take an interest, for example, how many in yours  there is a kastom-bridge on fate-kraulingovuju a cutlet. Yes I in course simply would be desirable to open eyes  that basically the content old Oise (and not only) can cost dearer any Porshkaena and it is necessary to be very much  that it to allow