1

Topic: Gift from VMProtect Software

We offer all buyers of our software a discount in 30 %: the Code of the coupon 2017-2017-2017 With coming New Year!

2

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, drVan, you wrote: V> We offer all buyers of our software a discount in 30 %: V> the Code of the coupon 2017-2017-2017 V> With coming New Year! That year there were 50 %

3

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: V>> We offer all buyers of our software a discount in 30 %: QC> that year there were 50 % Inflation the Deflation

4

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Colleagues Who uses, tell as VMProtect Ultimate in practice? 1. Interest complexity of embedding 2. Whether convenience of output of keys to users and controls of the produced keys 2.1 can be caused  at purchase of the logger 2.2 support of modifications like Standard/Pro 2.3 support of subscriptions to attending 2.4  keys for clients lost a key 3. Possibility of support before the produced keys 4. False Positives antiviruses 5. ?

5

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, Matrix_Failure, you wrote: M_F> Colleagues, M_F> 4. False Positives antiviruses of Naedites. Though I achieved only 1  at a comprehensible level of protection (with storage protection, but without compression).

6

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, Matrix_Failure, you wrote: M_F> Inflation the Deflation "to beat off 30 % the commission it is necessary to increase the price by 50 %" (this forum.

7

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, drVan, you wrote: V> We offer all buyers of our software a discount in 30 %: V> the Code of the coupon 2017-2017-2017 V> With coming New Year! And than it is better free and opened LLVM Obfuscator? Last works in the compiler that gives almost unlimited freedom in modification of structure of the program and allows not  with  VM. Supports more platforms (Linux), architecture (ARM, ARM64. MIPS) and executed formats (ELF). Only support  marginal languages (pascal type) and  check ?

8

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, Matrix_Failure, you wrote: M_F> Who uses, tell as VMProtect Ultimate in practice? Norms. It is pleasant to me. 1. Elementarily. 2. Integration in PPG is present. Or a pohape-script for what Avangejta. 2.1 It is possible. Besides, see 2. 2.2 Functionals of an upgrade at present are not present. I think, it makes sense to ask to enter Ivan the such. 2.3 it is not clear that means. Time limit? There is a such. 2.4 It is most already it is necessary to do. 3. Too it is not clear. In what plan support? 4. While norms. Except Vietnamese Bkav. And a dog with it. 5. In my case did not overcome.

9

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> And than it is better free and opened LLVM Obfuscator? Last works in the compiler that gives almost unlimited freedom in modification of structure of the program and allows not  with  VM. I so understood, what " VM" you and did not look? And then ask than it is better P.S. LLVM Obfuscator already can supervise integrity of code locations automatically?

10

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

IID> And than it is better free and opened LLVM Obfuscator? Free and opened there, by the way, not too it is a lot of if to esteem. Does not pull even on a mutation from vmprotect. So,  the code what they there in places also admit. And here the version is more serious at them already commercial and how many it costs and is how much far cunning from free - that still a question... The most interesting at them is described simply as "code obfuscation" but what exactly they do - not clearly. Still necessity to compile the code each time when it is necessary to protect it, sometimes hinders. We tell the same  it becomes already inconvenient to add. Though as a whole idea interesting, and Ivan explicitly should think in this side as the pair of new tasty platforms is with one blow hilled: ios and android

11

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

V> P.S. LLVM Obfuscator already can supervise integrity of code locations automatically? Write that in the paid version is able. But details, as usual, do not give

12

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

M_F> 1. Interest complexity of embedding depends on depth of integration. From the elementary case it selected functions under the list, delivered ticks, saved the project and added in an assembly script one more line. In more realistic scenario it is necessary to get acquainted with scripts. I while still on the second version as Ivan wrote in due time me an abrupt script of protection of all under the list for the third version it yet did not write me such script, and I  for this purpose... But as a whole it is possible to live: adjusted once and forgot. Whether M_F> 2.1 it is possible to cause  at logger purchase yes, all in source codes in several languages M_F> 2.2 support of modifications like Standard/Pro at you in  can go to 255 byte of the arbitrary data. I there push both an amount of users and license type. M_F> 2.3 support of subscriptions to attending yes, if  expiration date in .  will work in that case before certain date. Over it it is possible to make subscriptions with the necessary level of automation. Probably all is already made in weblm, I do not track it. M_F> 2.4  keys for clients lost at a key look in weblm, it is possible there is. If is not present - then hands, as  in itself -  instead of the server-sajd application M_F> 3. Possibility of support before the produced keys and it of that such?  from other protector? If short it is possible to throw in weblm as keys of activation like. And then to produce on them normal . It is possible, basically, and without weblm - there there will be a label in four columns + a simple script. M_F> 4. False Positives at me problems are not present antiviruses, but I as well sign files. Probably it influences. In the third version vmprotect there should be a support taggant, truth I  how much  now this business is supported. At those who supports,  too should not be, on idea. M_F> 5. ? Me, like, do not break. Poppy-version happens break, and  keeps. Though I for a long time the last time checked, can and broke off that already

13

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, ov, you wrote: V>> P.S. LLVM Obfuscator already can supervise integrity of code locations automatically? ov> write that in the paid version is able. But details, as usual, give I trust! (As far as I understand LLVM Obfuscator works exceptional at level IR of the code and machine representation of commands (as well as their addresses) at this stage are unknown. That it is possible was valuably is necessary implement pass after  (well or it will do itself ) which will adjust at least the table of hashes on controllable regions. As it generally can be implemented without  most LLVM I to itself I do not represent. P.S. Came to here mind - there can be paid counters go complete with finished LLVM? If it so it is already possible to consider this project dead.

14

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, ov, you wrote: ov> though as a whole idea interesting, and Ivan explicitly should think in this side as the pair of new tasty platforms is with one blow hilled: ios and android Hehe. To tell as this idea looks on an example ? Here present that your rendering goes "plug-in" to the unique videocard (we name it LLVM), and you in advertizing of the product speak - guys, throw out  the  (MSVC)/dzhyforsy (Delphi) and remaining programming languages  and urgently pass on LLVM. Because it abruptly - there works my rendering.  LLVM are glad, remaining programmers users twist a finger at a temple and buy a product of the competitor. But there is more to come! The most interesting begins further - users start to fill up you  which basically not difficult, but after all an ill luck - interface LLVM does not allow to make it. In multimonthly correspondence with developers LLVM you understand, these counters are absolutely not interesting to command LLVM and it is necessary you... It is necessary... To take source codes LLVM and to implement this all most (well  in passing understood this megamonster, spending still ///). As a result you start to answer users, what yes - these pieces are accessible in the paid version of a product, BUT to its set goes also new LLVM. The rest of programmers of users twist a finger at a temple and pass to a product of the competitor. A curtain.

15

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, ov, you wrote: M_F>> 2.3 support of subscriptions to attending ov> yes, if  expiration date in .  will work in that case before certain date. More likely restriction by date of the assembly that the user somehow long to work on the old version, and for operation on the new version it would need to pay a subscription.

16

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

V> P.S. Came to here mind - there can be paid counters go complete with finished LLVM? Judging by pictures on a site, it there that own, finished. At least there in xcode select between standard  and them. And a type inscription "based on llvm N.M" below.

17

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

V> guys, throw out  the  it is not necessary to throw out anything, it is necessary to offer separate  from creators of another abrupt . And  all rises on the places and will be abruptly. V> Odepty LLVM are glad well, all so, but adherents llvm in this case it is crowds of developers under two platforms most popular at present. So in your example with  would be more correct to tell about release generally absolutely another  on other conditions and for other users. I, actually, already one such let out the such. Like lives

18

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

M_F>>> 2.3 support of subscriptions to attending ov>> yes, if  expiration date in .  will work in that case before certain date. V> restriction by date of the assembly is faster that the user somehow long to work on the old version, and for operation on the new version it would need to pay a subscription. Yes, it agree, did not note "on attending". It becomes through max build date, successfully plows at me some years.

19

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, ov, you wrote: V>> P.S. Came to here mind - there can be paid counters go complete with finished LLVM? ov> judging by pictures on a site, it there that own, finished. At least there in xcode select between standard  and them. And a type inscription "based on llvm N.M" below. I and knew! Unambiguously .

20

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, ov, you wrote: V>> guys, throw out  the  ov> it is not necessary to throw out anything, it is necessary to offer separate  from creators of another abrupt . And  all rises on the places and will be abruptly. I generally  did not understand V>> Odepty LLVM are glad ov> well, all so, but adherents llvm in this case it is crowds of developers under two platforms most popular at present. So in your example with  would be more correct to tell about release generally absolutely another  on other conditions and for other users. I, actually, already one such let out the such. Like lives Well here you see that happens if to stretch yours ideas about LLVM on a real commercial product It appears it is necessary to do absolutely new product for perfect other users which share will be on orders less, and  on orders more (it appears it is necessary to saw also itself LLVM).

21

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

V> it is necessary to do absolutely new product for perfect other users which share will be on orders less, and  on orders more (it appears it is necessary to saw also itself LLVM). I do not agree with the selected. As the amount of developers under  aloud seems to me now exceeds an amount , especially those  to whom software protection is necessary. If I am wrong, all idea in a fire chamber. If I am right, you lose . Somehow so

22

Re: Gift from VMProtect Software

Hello, ov, you wrote: V>> it is necessary to do absolutely new product for perfect other users which share will be on orders less, and  on orders more (it appears it is necessary to saw also itself LLVM). ov> I do not agree with the selected. As the amount of developers under  aloud seems to me now exceeds an amount , especially those  to whom software protection is necessary. If I am wrong, all idea in a fire chamber. If I am right, you lose . Somehow so I am for some reason confident that protection under iOS generally  is necessary to nobody, since sales go exceptional through AppStore and level  there aspires to zero. Under  as far as I know the people write on JAVA, and Xamarin there move the.NET. Also what we receive as a result? And even we receive - an amount of potential users (writers on LLVM) on orders less, and  on orders it is more