26

Re: gui for linux - on what?

At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. Do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate).

27

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . And to you what for? That , it I will not be. Employ those who will be and do not force a brain.

28

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, push, you wrote: P> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). The customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without  grief.

29

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Hello, Darooma, you wrote: Sciter! The author to you the license can even gives free of charge. It and so free and open-sors. And a message as a matter of fact the correct. Sciter it is quite good, if you own  and there is a probability to get into a web or other platform.

30

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Similar on . What means I do not want? Be repelled that you know is better. Only do not say that you own all at level "". Here I own pluses, yes, and to Qt hands for 15 years and did not reach plainly. Wrote on wxWidgets everything, on the decision will be more superficial. Probably would select it. And so, which year not  from , would look on  at last. If with  affairs did not go, would select Sciter or Cef. It  trend ubiquitous, everyones Slack, Flowdock, Viber, Upwork, Github the client and a lot of other software cross connects-platforms do a muzzle on HTML/JS. All looks how many is.

31

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Hello, VTT, you wrote: VTT>> Like as now it is fashionable to saw a web muzzle, and to get into a mess with each version of each browser. fixed For access to application we give to the user our special browser.

32

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P>> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). _> the Customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without  grief. And the customer knows that such Linux or ?

33

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> and you to say binding did not try? Well, try. In Russian the settled pronunciation . It not a unique case of change of a transcription and it is normal. Strange it not to know.

34

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: VTT>> Like as now it is fashionable to saw a web muzzle, and to get into a mess with each version of each browser. fixed For this purpose is electron - the browser one, the version is fixed. What problems?

35

Re: gui for linux - on what?

tcl/tk

36

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Vain, you wrote: V> Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>>> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P>>> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). _>> the Customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without  grief. V> and the customer knows that such Linux or ? Different happen, some even certificate  want

37

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. With such manners to you of anything except Electron or NW.js does not remain. Though taking into account desire to hide source codes, perhaps, only NW.js (at an electron there like normal tar-archive).

38

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Now me  but why you not to look aside Lazarus? , it is possible to collect on the basis of Qt and with  . Recently quite suitable environment for development became.

39

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, licedey, you wrote: L> Here I own pluses, yes, and to Qt hands for 15 years and did not reach plainly. Wrote on wxWidgets everything, on the decision will be more superficial. Probably would select it. I also, owning pluses approximately 15 years, was engaged (only about one year back) in mastering Qt. Understood that Qt - very good tool! About  - 2016 leaves... This is how much actual most ? Or is more exact - to whom it generally is necessary, if the same Qt flies on machines 10 summer prescription? L> and so, which year not  from  It is a good choice, for Windows applications. For Linux -  reaches YET SOON. P.S. I know about mono, only as it  not M $, at me big  concerning its perspectives

40

Re: gui for linux - on what?

It would be necessary more politely, and that hammers fly... Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want 0 D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. 0 D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. It agree D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. A toad - brake D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Take Qt. It is finite With ++, but it Qt. There in places to With ++ also does not reach.

41

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. QT, a python or With ++.

42

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, AlexGin, you wrote: AG> Hello, licedey, you wrote: AG> I also, owning pluses approximately 15 years, was engaged (only about one year back) in mastering Qt. AG> Understood that Qt - very good tool! AG> About  - 2016 leaves... AG> this is how much actual most ? AG> Or is more exact - to whom it generally is necessary, if the same Qt flies on machines 10 summer prescription? L>> and so, which year not  from  AG> It is a good choice, for Windows applications. AG> for Linux -  reaches YET SOON. You underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. Concerning Qt - I meant not only speed of flight, how many the size of all library. Stupidly there is no time to study, yes I think and there is no sense already, since  aside HTML/JS.

43

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Here there is a list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_p … _libraries

44

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, licedey, you wrote: L> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date.

45

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . DLangUI, for example: https://github.com/buggins/dlangui At me now one project on it under  and Windows gathers and used at once. There at first the project was on fashionable ueb-technologies, but there banal unpretentious schedules of quotations braked mercilessly, therefore decided to do  the client. Quits not bad.

46

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> Hello, licedey, you wrote: L>> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. DM> WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date. Look https://habrahabr.ru/post/313202/#comment_9871506 there is the general-purpose wrapper with support XAML over  for platforms  (the dial-up  rich enough, now here photographed as it with GTK-bakendom on  looks). And as to analog WPF with completely rendering we work over it.

47

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> DLangUI, for example: https://github.com/buggins/dlangui DM> There at first the project was on fashionable ueb-technologies, but there banal unpretentious schedules of quotations braked mercilessly Instead of tried to launch interest for the sake of on Electron (the link gave above). There the engine v8 at which productivity quite good judging by responses is used.

48

Re: gui for linux - on what?

Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> Hello, licedey, you wrote: L>> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. DM> WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date. Emmas. Well, a wrapper. WPF wrote from zero, turning nothing only DirectX using. Both under a poppy write and under , it is assured operation already goes at full speed, at least because Xamarin with Mono bought, and there UI already is.