You are not logged in. Please login or register.
At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. Do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate).
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . And to you what for? That , it I will not be. Employ those who will be and do not force a brain.
Hello, push, you wrote: P> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). The customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without grief.
Hello, Glory, you wrote: Hello, Darooma, you wrote: Sciter! The author to you the license can even gives free of charge. It and so free and open-sors. And a message as a matter of fact the correct. Sciter it is quite good, if you own and there is a probability to get into a web or other platform.
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Similar on . What means I do not want? Be repelled that you know is better. Only do not say that you own all at level "". Here I own pluses, yes, and to Qt hands for 15 years and did not reach plainly. Wrote on wxWidgets everything, on the decision will be more superficial. Probably would select it. And so, which year not from , would look on at last. If with affairs did not go, would select Sciter or Cef. It trend ubiquitous, everyones Slack, Flowdock, Viber, Upwork, Github the client and a lot of other software cross connects-platforms do a muzzle on HTML/JS. All looks how many is.
Hello, Glory, you wrote: Hello, VTT, you wrote: VTT>> Like as now it is fashionable to saw a web muzzle, and to get into a mess with each version of each browser. fixed For access to application we give to the user our special browser.
Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P>> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). _> the Customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without grief. And the customer knows that such Linux or ?
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> and you to say binding did not try? Well, try. In Russian the settled pronunciation . It not a unique case of change of a transcription and it is normal. Strange it not to know.
Hello, Glory, you wrote: VTT>> Like as now it is fashionable to saw a web muzzle, and to get into a mess with each version of each browser. fixed For this purpose is electron - the browser one, the version is fixed. What problems?
tcl/tk
Hello, Vain, you wrote: V> Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>>> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P>>> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). _>> the Customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without grief. V> and the customer knows that such Linux or ? Different happen, some even certificate want
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. With such manners to you of anything except Electron or NW.js does not remain. Though taking into account desire to hide source codes, perhaps, only NW.js (at an electron there like normal tar-archive).
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Now me but why you not to look aside Lazarus? , it is possible to collect on the basis of Qt and with . Recently quite suitable environment for development became.
Hello, licedey, you wrote: L> Here I own pluses, yes, and to Qt hands for 15 years and did not reach plainly. Wrote on wxWidgets everything, on the decision will be more superficial. Probably would select it. I also, owning pluses approximately 15 years, was engaged (only about one year back) in mastering Qt. Understood that Qt - very good tool! About - 2016 leaves... This is how much actual most ? Or is more exact - to whom it generally is necessary, if the same Qt flies on machines 10 summer prescription? L> and so, which year not from It is a good choice, for Windows applications. For Linux - reaches YET SOON. P.S. I know about mono, only as it not M $, at me big concerning its perspectives
It would be necessary more politely, and that hammers fly... Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want 0 D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. 0 D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. It agree D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. A toad - brake D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Take Qt. It is finite With ++, but it Qt. There in places to With ++ also does not reach.
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. QT, a python or With ++.
Hello, AlexGin, you wrote: AG> Hello, licedey, you wrote: AG> I also, owning pluses approximately 15 years, was engaged (only about one year back) in mastering Qt. AG> Understood that Qt - very good tool! AG> About - 2016 leaves... AG> this is how much actual most ? AG> Or is more exact - to whom it generally is necessary, if the same Qt flies on machines 10 summer prescription? L>> and so, which year not from AG> It is a good choice, for Windows applications. AG> for Linux - reaches YET SOON. You underestimate Microsoft.NET Core already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. Concerning Qt - I meant not only speed of flight, how many the size of all library. Stupidly there is no time to study, yes I think and there is no sense already, since aside HTML/JS.
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Here there is a list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_p … _libraries
Hello, licedey, you wrote: L> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date.
Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . DLangUI, for example: https://github.com/buggins/dlangui At me now one project on it under and Windows gathers and used at once. There at first the project was on fashionable ueb-technologies, but there banal unpretentious schedules of quotations braked mercilessly, therefore decided to do the client. Quits not bad.
Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> Hello, licedey, you wrote: L>> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. DM> WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date. Look https://habrahabr.ru/post/313202/#comment_9871506 there is the general-purpose wrapper with support XAML over for platforms (the dial-up rich enough, now here photographed as it with GTK-bakendom on looks). And as to analog WPF with completely rendering we work over it.
Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> DLangUI, for example: https://github.com/buggins/dlangui DM> There at first the project was on fashionable ueb-technologies, but there banal unpretentious schedules of quotations braked mercilessly Instead of tried to launch interest for the sake of on Electron (the link gave above). There the engine v8 at which productivity quite good judging by responses is used.
Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> Hello, licedey, you wrote: L>> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. DM> WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date. Emmas. Well, a wrapper. WPF wrote from zero, turning nothing only DirectX using. Both under a poppy write and under , it is assured operation already goes at full speed, at least because Xamarin with Mono bought, and there UI already is.
Random topics