gui for linux - on what? (Page 2 of 2)

Hello, push, you wrote: P> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). The customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without  grief.

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. D> it is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Similar on . What means I do not want? Be repelled that you know is better. Only do not say that you own all at level "". Here I own pluses, yes, and to Qt hands for 15 years and did not reach plainly. Wrote on wxWidgets everything, on the decision will be more superficial. Probably would select it. And so, which year not  from , would look on  at last. If with  affairs did not go, would select Sciter or Cef. It  trend ubiquitous, everyones Slack, Flowdock, Viber, Upwork, Github the client and a lot of other software cross connects-platforms do a muzzle on HTML/JS. All looks how many is.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P>> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). _> the Customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without  grief. And the customer knows that such Linux or ?

Hello, Glory, you wrote: VTT>> Like as now it is fashionable to saw a web muzzle, and to get into a mess with each version of each browser. fixed For this purpose is electron - the browser one, the version is fixed. What problems?

Hello, Vain, you wrote: V> Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>>> At me a question - what for generally to write GUI for Linux? In what sacral sense? To whom it there it is necessary? Same not Win or Mac where for it pay - same Linux, here even for free its adherents spit. P>>> do not force to itself brains - you do a pack of configs and you are not soared. Further simply you automate also all (or adherents automate). _>> the Customer wants a workplace of the operator, and there without  grief. V> and the customer knows that such Linux or ? Different happen, some even certificate  want

Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Now me  but why you not to look aside Lazarus? , it is possible to collect on the basis of Qt and with  . Recently quite suitable environment for development became.

It would be necessary more politely, and that hammers fly... Hello, Darooma, you wrote: D> on mind comes only gtk on Rust and it is possible on wxWidgets Haskell'e. I do not know about gtk for Haskell'a, probably, approaches. All. D> - with ++ - I do not want 0 D> - Python - I do not want, it is necessary, that source codes have been closed. 0 D> - C# - about mono anything good as a whole did not hear. It agree D> - Java - unless. Though, heard that there too for GUI jambs are. A toad - brake D> It is desirable, but it is optional, that it was . Take Qt. It is finite With ++, but it Qt. There in places to With ++ also does not reach.

Hello, AlexGin, you wrote: AG> Hello, licedey, you wrote: AG> I also, owning pluses approximately 15 years, was engaged (only about one year back) in mastering Qt. AG> Understood that Qt - very good tool! AG> About  - 2016 leaves... AG> this is how much actual most ? AG> Or is more exact - to whom it generally is necessary, if the same Qt flies on machines 10 summer prescription? L>> and so, which year not  from  AG> It is a good choice, for Windows applications. AG> for Linux -  reaches YET SOON. You underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. Concerning Qt - I meant not only speed of flight, how many the size of all library. Stupidly there is no time to study, yes I think and there is no sense already, since  aside HTML/JS.

Hello, licedey, you wrote: L> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date.

Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> Hello, licedey, you wrote: L>> you underestimate Microsoft.NET Core  already on all pores Also there is a high probability that WinForms becomes AnyOsForms in the nearest versions. DM> WinForms initially thin wrapper over WinAPI which does not rush anywhere. If only from zero to rewrite, but then they will rewrite more likely something less out-of-date. Look https://habrahabr.ru/post/313202/#comment_9871506 there is the general-purpose wrapper with support XAML over  for platforms  (the dial-up  rich enough, now here photographed as it with GTK-bakendom on  looks). And as to analog WPF with completely rendering we work over it.