26

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V>> https://reestr.minsvyaz.ru/reestr/V>> Classes of the software V> "Project management systems, researches, development, designing" - goes? Produces left . For example the Project management system not too most that a CAD. And so on each point after a comma.

27

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, Vain, you wrote: V> Produces left . You search for any specific product? V> for example the Project management system not too most that a CAD. And so on each point after a comma. The CAD separately from project management does not live. , control of development - an integral part of any CAD.

28

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V>> Produces left . V> You search for any specific product? I found for a long time, simply normal search in letters and words yields better result, than through the qualifier. The output arises that people writing the qualifier at all in course on what classes the software shares. Them much more time  in 3, than there it is offered. And it only on , is real - on the order that generally quits for that simple list that they there made. V>> for example the Project management system not too most that a CAD. And so on each point after a comma. V> the CAD separately from project management does not live. , control of development - an integral part of any CAD. Project management it generally mostly from software development. How I will separate one project managements from others? Well porridge after all turns out. Besides a CAD a specific class, for example, Autocad it first of all a CAD instead of any spherical "project management".

29

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, Vain, you wrote: V> I found for a long time, simply normal search in letters and words yields better result, than through the qualifier. The output arises that people writing the qualifier at all in course on what classes the software shares. Them much more time  in 3, than there it is offered. And it only on , is real - on the order that generally quits for that simple list that they there made. 1. The more small classes, the more difficult on them to search. 2. The more small classes, the the product to one of them is more difficult to attribute. If to consider item 1/2 as a problematics, I would replace classes with "tags" as it is now fashionable, and would attribute to a product some tags. I would organize tags in hierarchical dependence (to uncover what for?) V>> the CAD separately from project management does not live. , control of development - an integral part of any CAD. V> project management it generally mostly from software development. Here still.) ) V> As I will separate one project managements from others? On additional keywords. There in search more than one field for a filtration. V> besides a CAD a specific class, for example, Autocad it first of all a CAD instead of any spherical "project management". You generally alive Autocad saw?) ) "The Bare" Autocad is as bare a Visual Studio + the assembler and more-CHE THING, i.e. any compiler from a high-level language, any designer, i.e. too-che thing. I.e., bare  is only a project management platform at almost total absence  a CAD. It is more difficult than any automation " a curve" or "make  curving with radius R" there is not present. It as the assembler or even the machine codes if to compare to software development. All cores   are fulfilled as job oriented plug-ins to an Autocad platform (or set of such plug-ins). It is possible to compare with ArchiCAD. This animal  already includes a high-grade CAD in the field of building of buildings, constructions and infrastructure networks (electrocabling, cooling, water supply etc.) . But! Thus itself ArchiCAD is too, first of all, system project management, and then already a CAD. In this platform too it is possible to add plug-ins. There generally philosophy curious: each library element - he to itself both a plug-in and the designer. In programs for building so it was accepted almost always, because  job oriented, unlike anywhere not oriented  .

30

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V>> I found for a long time, simply normal search in letters and words yields better result, than through the qualifier. The output arises that people writing the qualifier at all in course on what classes the software shares. Them much more time  in 3, than there it is offered. And it only on , is real - on the order that generally quits for that simple list that they there made. V> 1. The more small classes, the more difficult on them to search. V> 2. The more small classes, the the product to one of them is more difficult to attribute. V> If to consider item 1/2 as a problematics, I would replace classes with "tags" as it is now fashionable, and would attribute to a product some tags. So it so there also is made. V>> as I will separate one project managements from others? V> on additional keywords. There in search more than one field for a filtration. WHAT FOR? Why by a principle of the directory with branchings not to make was? You open the directory and to put a daw on a directory, you open directories and you remove daws from subdirectories and not directories, etc. Both as switching-on works and as an exception, and all variants before a nose. A profit. V>> besides a CAD a specific class, for example, Autocad it first of all a CAD instead of any spherical "project management". V> You generally alive the Autocad saw?) ) I "under it" also . V> "the Bare" Autocad is as bare a Visual Studio + the assembler and more-CHE THING, i.e. any compiler from a high-level language, any designer, i.e. too-che thing. I.e., bare  is only a project management platform at almost total absence  a CAD. What  project management in simple drawings? To the majority of users it  did not surrender. V> it is more difficult than any automation " a curve" or "make  curving with radius R" there is not present. It as the assembler or even the machine codes if to compare to software development. And here automation?? Automation it without presence of the person at process. V> all cores   are fulfilled as job oriented plug-ins to an Autocad platform (or set of such plug-ins). Speech at all about it. V> it is possible to compare with ArchiCAD. This animal  already includes a high-grade CAD in the field of building of buildings, constructions and infrastructure networks (electrocabling, cooling, water supply etc.). V> But! Thus itself ArchiCAD is too, first of all, system project management, and then already a CAD. What for to me to control projects when at me first of all the task it is necessary  to draw in accordance with GOST? Or you have more  than to go?

31

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, Vain, you wrote: V> What for to me to control projects when at me first of all the task it is necessary  to draw in accordance with GOST? Or you have more  than to go? Any project in real life is a whole bale of the bound drawings, including their different versions.

32

Re: Kaspersky about the register a software

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V>> What for to me to control projects when at me first of all the task it is necessary  to draw in accordance with GOST? Or you have more  than to go? V> any project in real life is a whole bale of the bound drawings, including their different versions. Are stored as at all in one daddy with .