26

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> Now the main thing that corrected as it is necessary, instead of forbade a deconstruction with one parameter, and will be to me  https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/1 … 47fcb09245

27

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Rhino, you wrote: R> So it is the reverse of the medal! Instead of homebrew psychologists-solvers-gnomes (magic of digits yes, in advertizing) come bearded uncles who except  saw nothing also all do the whole direction through console R> And here instead of symbiosis is had  the environments,  axes,  games - all . There is no time Because to saw and test! And it and and so will be though you 55 version let out though long which not to remember, it not depends on number, and from processes at the vendor. Passage to tags is is faster inevitable at software complication, differently and long number will not suffice - the large product consists of a heap of components, at each of which the versions.

28

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, DreamMaker, you wrote: DM> if to have fun, in an adult way: to train as it now fashionably neural grid well very deep training on all  and let it will be possible to write in any syntax, though as in a python, though With though  - itself let understands as . http://fastsalttimes.com/sections/foto-video/465.html?

29

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

_>> Now the main thing that corrected as it is necessary, instead of forbade a deconstruction with one parameter, and there will be to me  QL> https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/1 … 47fcb09245 Well here a pancake only counted upon a class feature, and they it again right at the beginning cut Here badly not that that   forbade. It will be difficult, of course, but somehow I will worry. Here badly that what to press  easier than to do more the common decision, but in vNext it  already in the form of impossibility of implementation of following features the Conceptual decision would be to start to think from that place, in which concrete variable it  , and void it ValueTupe without arguments generally (which, by the way, exists).

30

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

S> [/q] yes-yes, S> S> if (an is null) S> S> - legal c#7 the Rabbit hole even is deeper! I just checked up - in a command C# there are still people capable to do conceptual decisions: if (an is var d) {//type inference d !} switch (o) {case var d://could d and when th to check up!, but one var' is more ridiculous break;} After all it  only to hang up when on default - quite necessary feature against many  there And these people forbid possibilities to me  with one argument?!