1

Topic: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

At first wanted in dotnet. But the main point not that in the release-candidate of the newest studio found a bug in that a minute later after setting, and in that that at Balmere such  was not! I put release the candidate of new studio, I take the first feature, and catching  and most IDE and in addition the compiler. All right we admit IDE wrote crowd and in haste, it it is pardonable . But the compiler? Tests was not? Nobody wrote the elementary? How it was possible not to find it?? using System; using System. Collections. Generic; namespace ConsoleApp {class Program {class A {public int a; public void Deconstruct (out int b) {b = a;}} static void Main () {var p = new A () {a = 10}; var (p2) = p;//<- striking }}} In feedback .

2

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> In feedback . Better in roslyn issues, there there are more than chances that note. Quality - all as the people asked. The old kind enterprise-stajl was not pleasant, it would be desirable fast development? Well actually here, we enjoy. It is necessary to enter the new dictionary, something of type preview  is not ready release candidate any version, except release, including preview stable the release in the core is successfully updated works, remaining - stable release in the autumn preview in the autumn, the release in the spring (the recursive determination, aha) Possibilities in C# vNext Possibilities in C# vNext+1 New system of projects Changeover of the previous new system of projects Modular control of dependences, changeover to the out-of-date approach with target framework Fifty packets in references target framework is issued as meta-package and so on If seriously - well, is formal at us now releases and announcements of times in half a year. Upon - all the same cycle: Time in two years stable release, before . Development. Development never changes.

3

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: at new studio Updating of a Visual Studio 2017 Release Candidate Truth under.Net Core all works For me, as under 1.0.1, and 1.1

4

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Sinix, you wrote: S> Quality - all as the people asked. The old kind enterprise-stajl was not pleasant, it would be desirable fast development? Well actually here, we enjoy. Who wanted fast development?! Generally the general psychosis was entered just by corporation of harm with the Chrome. Which, probably, to it prompted homebrew psychologists-solvers-gnomes. Whether a joke, 55th version . And this delirium picked up ALL. Fie ...... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

5

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

S> Truth under.Net Core all works, as under 1.0.1, and 1.1 At me studio too the yesterday's. And you can under normal.NET check up?

6

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: S>> Truth under.Net Core all works, as under 1.0.1, and 1.1 _> At me studio too the yesterday's. And you can under normal.NET check up? Tomorrow. And you  under.Net Core

7

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: S>> Truth under.Net Core all works, as under 1.0.1, and 1.1 _> At me studio too the yesterday's. And you can under normal.NET check up? It is played back.

8

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

9

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Sinix, you wrote: S> Who manages to guess from the first that it deduces - my respect. (var z, var z1) = ((((x, y)), x), y).Item1; . I do not know meanwhile this such. Looks mysteriously. It is precisely necessary?

10

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> At first wanted in dotnet. But the main point not that in the release-candidate of the newest studio found a bug in that a minute later after setting, and in that that at Balmere such  was not! _> I put release the candidate of new studio, I take the first feature, and catching  and most IDE and in addition the compiler. All right we admit IDE wrote crowd and in haste, it it is pardonable . But the compiler? Tests was not? Nobody wrote the elementary? How it was possible not to find it?? http://rsdn.org/forum/dotnet/6587648 the author: the Philosopher Date: 19.10 16:44 Recently VS 2013 tried to get out for boundaries 2 Gb, the result is natural.

11

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Rhino, you wrote: whether R> the Joke, 55th version . And this delirium picked up ALL. Fie ... And 55, then 56 it is pleasant to me more, than 0.01.938.654 with following it 0.01.938.1245

12

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

13

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

S> S> if (an is null) S> {S>} S> S> - legal c#7 That do not do, and on an output all the same VB quits: If (Not obj Is Nothing) Then... End If

14

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, turbocode, you wrote: T> That do not do, and on an output all the same VB quits: T> If (Not obj Is Nothing) Then Nea, in VB is beautiful now, there is not nothing seems added, if did not cancel certainly. It is all changes By the way, about nothing/empty. , attempt to resolve  designers for structures. Nuance that  cannot guarantee their call. Still a bonus: new Struct () and default (Struct) one fine day can become different values. And these people ... ().

15

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

S> By the way, about nothing/empty. , attempt to resolve  designers for structures. Nuance that  cannot guarantee their call. Still a bonus: new Struct () and default (Struct) one fine day can become different values. Would add in With ++ the key/GC (to include a garbage collector) and would not suffer.

16

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> At first wanted in dotnet. But the main point not that in the release-candidate of the newest studio found a bug in that a minute later after setting, and in that that at Balmere such  was not! _> static void Main () _> {_> var p = new A () {a = 10}; _> var (p2) = p;//<- striking  _>} _>} _>} _> [/c#] Greetings the Floor of hour rolled over in these new tuply-literals to understand a code essence. , they from crafty, only break typification. By the way in due time, when wrote the bicycle  with ++, and then test silt the same code in VS received INTERNAL COMPILER error almost through time. That still times of 6th studio were. So I think a tendency was saved, at MS  in a priority to a deadline all features to make SOMEHOW, and then we receive Update1, Update2... Update42.

17

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> At first wanted in dotnet. But the main point not that in the release-candidate of the newest studio found a bug in that a minute later after setting, and in that that at Balmere such  was not! It that, at me this miracle did not rise at all, the installer with a muffled error falls. Thus that previous  rose

18

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

19

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: S>> Truth under.Net Core all works, as under 1.0.1, and 1.1 _> At me studio too the yesterday's. And you can under normal.NET check up? I am sorry. I have two  a Version-candidate of Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2017 Version 15.0.25914.0 D15REL the Installed version: Professional the Version-candidate of Microsoft Visual Studio Enterprise 2017 Version 15.0.26009.0 D15REL the Installed version: Enterprise On the previous works, and on new as well as at you falls. Old errors are as they say rectified and the new are added

20

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

S> it is better in roslyn issues, there there are more than chances that note.  both there, and suddenly already played back and  so all can not it is lost. Now the main thing that corrected as it is necessary, instead of forbade a deconstruction with one parameter, and will be to me  S> If seriously - well, it is formal at us now releases and announcements of times in half a year. Upon - all the same cycle: time in two years stable release, before . Development. Development never changes. IDE and  Core I am ready to forgive everything, but  should be  - tests on  with number of parameters from 0 to 129 naturally ask. Explicitly not a level etude nikov'a (by the way for a long time it it was not visible). P.S. About the extension of boundaries legal C#. I will make it a sentence that a method call through _ a gap  was a legal call. Then it will be possible to write class.method tuple, without  - after all at  already  as is. Also will be "abruptly" as in pythons. This feature is necessary to precisely nobody, but time we on a party - it is necessary to have fun

21

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> IDE and  Core I am ready to forgive everything, but  should be  - tests on  with number of parameters from 0 to 129 naturally ask. Explicitly not a level etude nikov'a (by the way for a long time it it was not visible). Well, others  at them for us are not present. Return Hejlsberga, aha. _> P.S. About the extension of boundaries legal C#. I will make it a sentence that a method call through _ a gap  was a legal call. Then it will be possible to write class.method tuple, without  - after all at  already  as is. Also will be "abruptly" as in pythons. This feature is necessary to precisely nobody, but time we on a party - it is necessary to have fun In comparison with those heavy drugs that there periodically in  floats -  a kindergarten. Here a common example: 1. We take  which in  generally it is not necessary to add, they through release will be replaced with records. 2. Suddenly (tm) it appears that the code with  looks awfully and is supported . 3. The following thought what? , not "can, with  something not so?". Not, driving only forward is possible. Therefore give   in public Tally (IEnumerable <int> values) return (int sum, int count) =>... Well better Here it is serious, such impression. That the people read about a feature X - and want it in  in that type as is, without considering how much it gets on with other features that can break, what scenarios cannot after that be made - not, it somehow . In other language consulted - means and  .

22

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, hi_octane, you wrote: _> P.S. About the extension of boundaries legal C#. I will make it a sentence that a method call through _ a gap  was a legal call. Then it will be possible to write class.method tuple, without  - after all at  already  as is. Also will be "abruptly" as in pythons. This feature is necessary to precisely nobody, but time we on a party - it is necessary to have fun if to have fun, in an adult way: to train as it now fashionably neural grid well very deep training on all  and let it will be possible to write in any syntax, though as in a python, though With though  - itself let understands both . On what is more similar, and . Well and that  - so one horse-radish, the same result as well as now, but abruptly and cheerfully.

23

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> And me 55, then 56 it is pleasant more, than 0.01.938.654 about 0.01.938.1245 It following it yes. I somehow missed that means the last number? There was [a major version] earlier. [The minor version]. [] And now that else added number?

24

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Evgeniy Skvortsov, you wrote: ES> It yes. I somehow missed that means the last number? There was [a major version] earlier. [The minor version]. [] ES> And now that else added number? It at whom as. There are fans not to let out at all releases for 10 years from project start why I 0 and wrote. And major/minor sometimes generally mean nothing, features add where . Generally, such numbering can be convenient for developers, but in any way for users, it 55 version is much more convenient. Or at least 2 numbers, but are no more. Eventually, it is possible to hang up a tag on the assembly, and not to load the user the kitchen?

25

Re: VS 2017 - alpha release-candidate

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Generally, such numbering can be convenient for developers, but in any way for users, it 55 version is much more convenient. Or at least 2 numbers, but are no more. Eventually, it is possible to hang up a tag on the assembly, and not to load the user the kitchen? So it is the reverse of the medal! Instead of homebrew psychologists-solvers-gnomes (magic of digits yes, in advertizing) come bearded uncles who except  saw nothing also all do the whole direction through the console And here instead of symbiosis is had  the environments,  axes,  games - all . There is no time Because to saw and test!... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>