1

Topic: Storage not a resource () ()

Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  buys" And so, Google so, seemingly, does not think Company Google let out 55th version of browser Chrome for desktops in which creators aloud cut down consumption of operative storage. There there

2

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  buys" S> And so, Google so, seemingly, does not think S> S> Company Google let out 55th version of browser Chrome for desktops in which creators aloud cut down consumption of operative storage. S> there it tell about a server software.

3

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  Who buys" could assume that once there will be a chrome?

4

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, rFLY, you wrote: S>> Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  Who buys" FLY> could assume that once there will be a chrome? Well, if permanently affirms that storage - not a resource (() from this just  it turns out in itself, a direct output.

5

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  buys" S> And so, Google so, seemingly, does not think S> there there Is at me a Chrome on one computer. It was updated to 55. While special differences I do not see. Anything, 640  will be to enough any.

6

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, the Sense of that phrase was that cares of storage GC, it is not necessary to track its clearing as attentively, as behind clearing of the "present" resources (files and other kernel objects). Here chrome on pluses where is not present GC, there continue struggle for freedom of bytes from invaders. Though like something GC-shaped they there sawed (oilpan), I do not know than ended.

7

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, D. Mon, you wrote: DM> the Sense of that phrase was that cares of storage GC, it is not necessary to track its clearing as attentively, as behind clearing of the "present" resources (files and other kernel objects). DM> Here chrome on pluses where is not present GC, there continue struggle for freedom of bytes from invaders. Though like something GC-shaped they there sawed (oilpan), I do not know than ended. Thanks, Kep. Only here this phrase floats not only in talks about , and in talks about "this software guzzles storage as not in itself"

8

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Company Google let out 55th version of browser Chrome for desktops in which creators aloud cut down consumption of operative storage. At first they did many years the browser consuming many storages and is worse  on speed. And after achieved success - started to optimize the literary trash (on With ++, by the way).

9

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Glory, you wrote: and is worse  on speed. And I saw a label with digits, where on the contrary. In my opinion, in it samplings of performance JavaScript were resulted.

10

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Mihas, you wrote:> and is worse  on speed. M> and I saw a label with digits, where on the contrary. In my opinion, in it samplings of performance JavaScript were resulted. Speech probably went about one heavy single page application. But without them - chrome starts to brake simply on a considerable quantity of tabs, in  such is not present. Yes, for things like google docs chrome is better. But it is not all Internet.

11

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Glory, you wrote: [became painful] And still  the plug-in for gestures became paid. And that free - were not pleasant. I am transplanted reversely on . [/became painful]

12

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Glory, you wrote: Speech probably went about one heavy single page application. But without them - chrome starts to brake simply on a considerable quantity of tabs, in  such is not present. Yes, for things like google docs chrome is better. But it is not all Internet. Collected to a daughter (6 years) the computer from any old stuff of type GT8600 256mb and Core2 Q6600 with 2 RAM. A network - ancient WiFi the card, gives all some megabit from a daughter's room. Truth instead of found in stuff 40 the Maxtor delivered at once SSD, differently this mockery full. And so, guess what browser there the fastest? (Drumbeat) Internet Explorer! And it is considerable, noticeable approximately. Because storage guzzles reasonably. Chrome brakes simply awfully, already after 3-4 open tabs. On my main house computer just the same stone,  storages 8 and 100 connection on a lace. With such input chrome behaves adequately even at 20 tabs. P.S.: With nostalgia I recall Opera 12.15 which is absolutely comprehensible worked from 30-40 tabs on a computer without SSD. Storage in gigabytes did not guzzle.

13

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> P.S.: with nostalgia I recall Opera 12.15 which is absolutely comprehensible worked from 30-40 tabs on a computer without SSD. Storage in gigabytes did not guzzle. Well everything, killed the Opera. As it happens: the big office comes on the market. Rolls out something crude, but with . Loudly shouts in a megaphone: - We can !! 1. (Audience): - Ooooo!. - We can !!! 1 (audience in ecstasy) - Aaaaaa! (The people for a long time using what already was) - And  you is necessary "" and ""? (Audience) - Krasivenko! As a result after a while the office becomes a monopolist. I want to look for a long time at video "at screwing up of cool features reversely in a drink to developers, ,  and to directors". That not  a noosphere.

14

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  buys" S> And so, Google so, seemingly, does not think In Google morons, not in that are engaged. With  storages already all reconciled, it was necessary to do it many years ago.

15

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Glory, you wrote: As it happens: the big office comes on the market. Rolls out something crude, but with . Loudly shouts in a megaphone: As a result after a while the office becomes a monopolist. Or it is appealed. To whom as carries. For example, at Microsoft the similar rolled twice: at release Windows 3.0 and Windows 95. And at Borland not , , with dBase IV. I want to look for a long time at video "at screwing up of cool features reversely in a drink to developers, ,  and to directors". That not  a noosphere. The audience does not allow. P.S.

16

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Sheridan, you wrote: S> Well after all so, yes? There and then permanently write  "yes  on storage,  buys" S> And so, Google so, seemingly, does not think S> S> Company Google let out 55th version of browser Chrome for desktops in which creators aloud cut down consumption of operative storage. S> there and Google not the first who attended to it. 20 years ago Microsoft (yes-yes!) let out Windows NT 4 which was less gluttonous, than 3.5.

17

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> In Google morons, not are engaged in that. With  storages already all reconciled, it was necessary to do it many years ago. Do not tell. Guzzles absolutely immodest (I even would tell "inexplicable") in volumes. I suppose that on mobile devices where Google too pushes chrome, a problem much more sharply.

18

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> And Google not the first who attended to it. 20 years ago Microsoft (yes-yes!) let out Windows NT 4 which was less gluttonous, than 3.5. Similar events are too rare Probably therefore and . The people do not trust in an event By the way 10 guzzle resources  than 8 (and even than 7). I when saw too NT4 recalled

19

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> do not tell. Guzzles absolutely immodest (I even would tell "inexplicable") in volumes. I suppose that on mobile devices where Google too pushes chrome, a problem much more sharply. Yes on mobile too already volumes  are tightened. And here on a computer... For a long time already would pass to chrome if at them tabs normal are. But they buried this subject, and were engaged in storage.

20

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> for a long time already would pass to chrome if at them tabs normal are. But they buried this subject, and were engaged in storage. And what there with tabs not so? And than you use? I EDGE  with pleasure, but it  from 2016 Server

21

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> do not tell. Guzzles absolutely immodest (I even would tell "inexplicable") in volumes. I suppose that on mobile devices where Google too pushes chrome, a problem much more sharply. On Gnusmase with Vedroidom I try to keep from Chrome far away. Almost never I open it of any links which send to me.

22

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID> And what there with tabs not so? And than you use? I EDGE  with pleasure, but it  from 2016 Server At them tabs nails are beaten, tree style tabs not to make.

23

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> At them tabs are beaten by nails, tree style tabs not to make. And what for? When the tab a little than differs from whole . Launch 3-5-10 , in each of which group of tabs. They will rise from saving also, grouped.

24

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, Privalov, you wrote: P> On Gnusmase with Vedroidom I try to keep from Chrome far away. Almost never I open it of any links which send to me. You think in WebView bugs is not present? Or made a noise stagefright - it generally  to browser type.

25

Re: Storage not a resource () ()

Hello, IID, you wrote: IID>>> P.S.: with nostalgia I would recall Opera 12.15 Ops>> for a long time already passed to chrome if at them tabs normal are. But they buried this subject, and were engaged in storage. IID> and what there with tabs not so? And than you use? I EDGE  with pleasure, but it  from 2016 Server Vivaldi try.  chrome, the old command of an opera does, all . Is able to preempt unnecessary tabs from storage if it is critical.