Hello, biochemist, you wrote: B> Hello, okon, you wrote: O>> If that that the Subject told about Navalnom was truth - we on choices of the mayor would not see 27 %. managed in the conditions of the active antipropagation on the central TV, holding the active meetings with voters received 27 %, it in 2 times more than was received by the candidate from enough popular a batch with an operation wide experience - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. B> the Subject as for also writes about the one who helped it. Also that Lyosha after threw them. Who helped it? It personally walked on meetings and appeared. Naturally it was helped by many volunteers, and all he told thanks. That Katz there during the selective company in the maid from a staff also started to be jealous that of the chief of a staff that led to conflicts and started to hinder the company and it discharged, it does not mean that threw someone. I would think at you on operation precisely also arrived with the anxious guy who is jealous and a saliva on colleagues instead of doing serious work. O>> This experimental fact shows that the liar here Subject B> It shows that on the person, dared to speak against "liberal", the rack at once goes down. And this sin is even stronger, than "I do not understand people who do not travel across Russia". He did not speak against, it is not necessary to confuse to "speak against and spoil, the Subject spoiled with envy or can to it paid. Since in this case he shouted to the hamsters" This it to g th "no more that, practically that he mentions all who is too strongly distorted, aimed at those not in a subject and the word takes.