1

Topic: I about Lebedev

Lebedev Tema and as him there call,  . Well I am fine it there a letter  sold for millions roubles, dissolved, rollbacks would be received most likely differently by what idiot agreed to buy. I think Lebedev's all business on it and it is constructed, who wants to master the company budget go to agree to the Subject, and it then drives and writes about that as it  your grandmas in the next country. About its talent I know not on  - someone from acquaintances decided to order in it design, made expensively and  (it was pleasant to nobody). Lebedev's credo on life - to advertize the lack of talent and to abuse others. But that here it that suddenly got into a policy, really to it and here unexpectedly brought. Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, at it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician.

2

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, at it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. When you will type more Troitsk then also to us here about a policy you will write. It is free.

3

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, In Moscow? O> when a subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. And the Spider already let out? At you all candidates any criminal.

4

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> Hello, okon, you wrote: O>> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. A> when you will type more Troitsk then also to us here about a policy you will write. It is free. I do not have so much hamsters as at the Subject that I on them the expressions rendered any influence. My judgement it does not render influence, in difference from it , therefore to it and requirements for a market to answer as though more religiously.

5

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O>>> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, at it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. A>> when you will type more Troitsk then also to us here about a policy you will write. It is free. O> I do not have so much hamsters as at the Subject that I on them the expressions rendered any influence. Work over itself., Troitsk worked. O> my judgement it does not render influence, in difference from it , therefore to it and requirements for a market to answer as though more religiously. So you simply envy?

6

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, Ops, you wrote: O>> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, Ops> In Moscow? 70 % actually, are simple at it victory  stole, as at communists in Saratov

7

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> Hello, okon, you wrote: O>>>> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. A>>> when you will type more Troitsk then also to us here about a policy you will write. It is free. O>> I do not have so much hamsters as at the Subject that I on them the expressions rendered any influence. A> work over itself., Troitsk worked. I earn software development to me hamsters are not necessary O>> My judgement it does not render influence, in difference from it , therefore to it and requirements for a market to answer as though more religiously. A> So you simply envy? To that to envy here? Simply I already  do not read for a long time this conceited person (I do not love when public known people and not only clever people) start to roll a butt also with a floor-mat on others it explicitly far not, but here it here reminded of itself(himself) and it showed once again what vile and unpleasant.

8

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O>>> I do not have so much hamsters as at the Subject that I on them the expressions rendered any influence. A>> work over itself., Troitsk worked. O> I earn software development to me hamsters are not necessary But you are nervous that at someone they are. However, Navalnomu as I understood, it is possible to have "hamsters". O>>> My judgement it does not render influence, in difference from it , therefore to it and requirements for a market to answer as though more religiously. A>> So you simply envy? O> to that to envy here? Simply I already  do not read for a long time this conceited person (I do not love when public known people and not only clever people) start to roll a butt also with a floor-mat on others it explicitly far not, but here it here reminded of itself(himself) and it showed once again what vile and unpleasant. We admit, it vile and unpleasant, is enough of it to shut it a mouth? And if someone considers Navalnogo vile and unpleasant?

9

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> Lebedev Tema and as him there call,  . O> But that here it that suddenly got into a policy, really to it and here unexpectedly brought. O> generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, Simply... <<RSDN@Home 1.2.0 alpha 5 rev. 1495>>

10

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> Hello, okon, you wrote: O>>>> I do not have so much hamsters as at the Subject that I on them the expressions rendered any influence. A>>> work over itself., Troitsk worked. O>> I earn software development to me hamsters are not necessary A> But you are nervous that at someone they are. However, Navalnomu as I understood, it is possible to have "hamsters". It is possible to have hamsters all and everyone anyhow manipulates hamsters it is natural process, hamsters unite round what or the leader, it is pleasant to someone as the leader  a floor-mat operation and creativity of others, someone likes the leader which convicts swindlers more. But I am am disturbed more that by the leader  instead of the field of activity, got absolutely into another. A> we admit, it vile and unpleasant, is enough of it to shut it a mouth? And if someone considers Navalnogo vile and unpleasant? When Navalnyj begins  the Subject what at it the bad design do not order and generally the Subject made nothing as the designer then I and Navalnogo will count vile. All right this the Subject though on the customary subject a site of Navalnogo  that there wrong fonts or color (by the way possibly he took offense that  not the design orders in it), but it started to interpose to it into the selective company of a stick, it absolutely another already nasty thing level.

11

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: A>> Work over itself., Troitsk worked. O> I earn software development to me hamsters are not necessary Well, hamsters your software  use a software. And you speak, are not necessary O>>> My judgement it does not render influence, in difference from it , therefore to it and requirements for a market to answer as though more religiously. A>> So you simply envy? O> to that to envy here? Simply I already  do not read for a long time this conceited person (I do not love when public known people and not only clever people) start to roll a butt also with a floor-mat on others it explicitly far not, but here it here reminded of itself(himself) and it showed once again what vile and unpleasant. Well also do not read and further

12

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> it is fine this the Subject though on the customary subject a site of Navalnogo  that there wrong fonts or color (by the way possibly he took offense that  not the design orders in it), but it started to interpose to it into the selective company of a stick, it absolutely another already nasty thing level. Give better Oduvana we consider with its performances

13

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> When Navalnyj begins  the Subject what at it the bad design do not order and generally the Subject made nothing as the designer then I and Navalnogo will count vile. So a difference only that the Subject   "as the designer", unlike. O> it is fine this the Subject though on the customary subject a site of Navalnogo  that there wrong fonts or color (by the way possibly he took offense that  not the design orders in it), but it started to interpose to it into the selective company of a stick, it absolutely another already nasty thing level. What nasty thing, yes as he dared..... <<RSDN@Home 1.2.0 alpha 5 rev. 1495>>

14

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, jhfrek, you wrote: O>>> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, Ops>> In Moscow? J> 70 % actually, are simple at it victory  stole, as at communists in Saratov Here  what c, all the same from whom to steal if only to steal

15

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: A>> Work over itself., Troitsk worked. O> I earn software development to me hamsters are not necessary Give, show the product.

16

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: A>> But you are nervous that at someone they are. However, Navalnomu as I understood, it is possible to have "hamsters". O> it is possible to have Hamsters all and everyone anyhow manipulates hamsters it is natural process, hamsters unite round what or the leader, it is pleasant to someone as the leader  a floor-mat operation and creativity of others, someone likes the leader which convicts swindlers more. But I am am disturbed more that by the leader  instead of the field of activity, got absolutely into another. At us that, the shop right, and the designer never can become the politician? The policy concerns everything, and all have the right to express it. Especially about the candidate for presidents which in case of election can climb generally in any sphere. A>> we admit, it vile and unpleasant, is enough of it to shut it a mouth? And if someone considers Navalnogo vile and unpleasant? O> When Navalnyj begins  the Subject what at it the bad design do not order and generally the Subject made nothing as the designer then I and Navalnogo will count vile. All right this the Subject though on the customary subject a site of Navalnogo  that there wrong fonts or color (by the way possibly he took offense that  not the design orders in it), but it started to interpose to it into the selective company of a stick, it absolutely another already nasty thing level. Perfectly, it is necessary to forbid to consider Navalnogo in a negative context because it will hinder to lead to it the selective company. You it, urgently demand to delete all subjects with arguing of Navalnogo from a site and then too there is some audience. Generally it is amusing, as adherents of Navalnogo support political censorship.

17

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> but it started to interpose to it into the selective company of a stick, it absolutely another already nasty thing level. What, the freedom of speech is not pleasant? And generally, such it "an estimate opinion" (Navalnyj

18

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: A>> It is admissible, it vile and unpleasant, is enough of it to shut it a mouth? And if someone considers Navalnogo vile and unpleasant? O> when Navalnyj begins  the Subject what at it the bad design do not order and generally the Subject made nothing as the designer then I and Navalnogo will count vile. And yourself you consider vile? O> about its talent I know not on  - someone from acquaintances decided to order in it design, made expensively and  (it was pleasant to nobody).

19

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O>  . O> a letter I  sold for millions roubles O> Lebedev's all business on it and is constructed O> About its talent I know not on  O> expensively and  O> to advertize the lack of talent and to abuse others. And now explain to me, what all it concerns the content of a post of Tatjanycha about Navalnom? Suffices to argue on variants . Down with debates round technical questions. We seize more elevated style of dispute. Dispute without the facts. Dispute on temperament. The dispute passing from mere allegation on the person of the partner. What can tell lame about Herbert's art a background of Karajana? If to it at once to declare that he lame, it recognizes itself(himself) won. On what the person who did not change the passport can argue? What sights at architecture the man without a residence permit can state? Caught red-handed, he confesses and recognizes itself won. And generally, unless us the judgement of the person bald, with such nose can interest? Let at first corrects a nose, grows hair, and then and expresses. O> generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, O> when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. http://lurkmore.to/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D … 1%81%D1%8F

20

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote:... O> But that here it that suddenly got into a policy, really to it and here unexpectedly brought. Well it is clear, Lebedev - the boor and lack of talent, therefore and started to make comments on a policy. But you of that got???

21

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> Lebedev Tema and as him there call,  . The subject here appears as the citizen of the country (whatever it was, but the fact that it the citizen of the Russian Federation). Any so can appear, and even not the citizen. Or the politician can consider the politician only?

22

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> Lebedev Tema and as him there call,  . My friend, here many agree with you that Tatjanych so-so the designer, and in its posts is too much  and a floor-mat. It is possible, truth, to argue about quality of operation of its firm as Tatjanych typed many talented people, and it does not do design. But it is interesting to nobody. Important only that all told about Navalnom - truth. At least very many with it agree.  is not able to organize people round itself. He is not able to agree. And methods with which Navalnyj tries to operate in the politician are low and mean.  - the swindler and the sharper. On this you absolutely in vain spent so much time for struggle against Tatjanychem. Would result at least pair of arguments for Navalnogo better. O> Generally Navalnyj typed on choices of the mayor of Moscow of 27 %, it above all candidates from "" the Duma batches, O> when the Subject Lebedev types more Spider (Troitsk) then we look that he understands in choices and the politician. It is not necessary to be a hen to have the right to judge fried eggs () Mark Twain Ili give we recognize the right of any including Tatjanycha, on the expression of judgement on others or if you please to confirm the right to critic Tatjanycha and generally occupation by a policy therefore as Tatjanych politicizes in the same way as you. Simply it is more known than you a little. That's all.  Your subject is more similar to Varlamov Avtor's hysterics: Sheridan Date: 16.12 22:00.

23

Re: I about Lebedev

O>> it is possible to have Hamsters all and everyone anyhow manipulates hamsters it is natural process, hamsters unite round what or the leader, it is pleasant to someone as the leader  a floor-mat operation and creativity of others, someone likes the leader which convicts swindlers more. But I am am disturbed more that by the leader  instead of the field of activity, got absolutely into another. A> at us that, the shop right, and the designer never can become the politician? The policy concerns everything, and all have the right to express it. Especially about the candidate for presidents which in case of election can climb generally in any sphere. If he wants let the politician will become them, and is not present so shouted "all politicians dogs" and in bushes. Or it envies Navalnomu that that tries to take part in presidential elections and starts it to water. A> it is excellent, it is necessary to forbid to consider Navalnogo in a negative context because it will hinder to lead to it the selective company. You it, urgently demand to delete all subjects with arguing of Navalnogo from a site and then too there is some audience. Generally it is amusing, as adherents of Navalnogo support political censorship. I not for censorship I against lies and  and that people which broadcast on mass of hamsters including central channels were not engaged in propagation of the erotic imaginations. If abuse, let at least more , type "Navalnyj made nothing and wants to be the president","Putin before became the president made much" - let results examples."  praised nobody from the power only abuses "- not truth, there were cases when praised for the correct actions, let the Subject gives an example as Putin praised opposition. We present it is admissible that two persons compete with each other, one with the experience other newcomer. The Subject here jumps out You shout" the newcomer you to g th "and instead of taking part in running and to show who it, hides in bushes. It not simply negative context. I here against such expressions.

24

Re: I about Lebedev

VD> that all told about Navalnom - truth is important only. At least very many with it agree. If that that a subject told about Navalnom was truth - we on choices of the mayor would not see 27 %.  managed in the conditions of the active antipropagation on the central TV, holding the active meetings with voters received 27 %, it in 2 times more than was received by the candidate from enough popular a batch with an operation wide experience - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. The liar here the Subject shows this experimental fact that

25

Re: I about Lebedev

Hello, okon, you wrote: O> "Navalnyj praised nobody from the power only abuses" - not truth, there were cases when praised for the correct actions, let the Subject gives an example as Putin praised opposition. Well time you say that were, you does not complicate them to result; only I am afraid, even if something you will dig out, it will be in a context of squabbles in opposition. Well and at the same time to cite Lebedev where he said, what Putin praised (though at once , what praised Sand, it is considered?).