26

Re: What to select

wrote:

it is passed...
Whether and I can make so:
1. To install Windows Server, to lift its role Hyper-V
2. As virtual machines to install 2 Windows Servera, one to make the domain controler (+ applications etc.), and the second to use as the server of databases? In sense on the second to install MS a SQL Server. Now so all works for me, only at present it is two different physical server, and I want to install all this economy on one.

It seems that it is the unique normal circuit.
And the second iron server to use for .

27

Re: What to select

wrote:

At me now two physical server, and I want instead of them one. With a view of saving.
The domain controler and MS SQL the server on one OS to install in one case it does not turn out (if the first to install MS SQL), in the second case system at setting MS SQL on the domain controler hundred times . Here what for virtualization, the blessing is necessary to me that server resources allow.
Daily  bases and states of servers (built in means Windows) I do and so.

Therefore also offer, on 2 physical server to put pure , windows hyper-v server, and on one to launch 2   and mssql, well and further  these  means of a microsoftware and to add these  on 2nd  with their recovery, but not start... MSSQL all the same  separately...

28

Re: What to select

Sergey Orlov wrote:

it is passed...
Therefore also offer, on 2 physical server to put pure , windows hyper-v server, and on one to launch 2   and mssql, well and further  these  means of a microsoftware and to add these  on 2nd  with their recovery, but not start... MSSQL all the same  separately...

And in what a difference (from the practical point of view, with reference to my situation) between to lift role Hyper-V or to put pure Hyper-V the server?

29

Re: What to select

wrote:

And in what difference (from the practical point of view, with reference to my situation) between to lift role Hyper-V or to put pure Hyper-V the server?

Let's-with
1. From the license, in the second case of anything it is not necessary to buy, and in the first, you should have on the substance of 3 licenses, on 2 licenses for a physical computer and one more on the virtual machine in which will be the same is twisted for example sql. Esteem eula, there all is chewed.
2. Physical computers can have distinction on hardware.
3. At an iron output on the main server, you will simply launch the virtual machines on the second computer, truth with loss of the information since , but idle time will be almost minimum...

30

Re: What to select

Sergey Orlov wrote:

1. From the license, in the second case of anything it is not necessary to buy, and in the first, you should have on the substance of 3 licenses, on 2 licenses for a physical computer and one more on the virtual machine in which will be the same is twisted for example sql. Esteem eula, there all is chewed.

Damien - earlier corrected me into the account of change of the circuit of licensing.
I.e. with 2012 it is minimum:
1 license (St) = 2 CPU servers and 2 virtual machines.
And further - depending on than what it is more. If 4  - it is necessary 2 licenses;
If 6  - 3 licenses, if 4  and 4  - 2 licenses.
I.e. the binding to   already is not present system as in 2008 and in both cases 1 license on  the physical server with 2 processors is necessary. (With possibility of setting of 2 virtual machines on everyone)

31

Re: What to select

Siemargl wrote:

it is passed...
It seems that it is the unique normal circuit.
And the second iron server to use for .

And  with usage of the free version veeam. (By means of scripts it is possible to automate)

32

Re: What to select

The northerner,

Sergey Orlov wrote:

it is passed...
Let's-with
1. From the license, in the second case of anything it is not necessary to buy, and in the first, you should have on the substance of 3 licenses, on 2 licenses for a physical computer and one more on the virtual machine in which will be the same is twisted for example sql. Esteem eula, there all is chewed.

Here I mean that the Windows in  demand the license and thus the, instead of itself ...

33

Re: What to select

Basil A. Sidorov wrote:

P.S. Just in case: role Hyper-V and Hyper-V Server - two absolutely different things.

in what?