Re: Domestic microprocessors (2) (a part 8)
I in the sense that Russian manual, as a rule, am able to focus resources on the decision of essential tasks, let and to the detriment of needs of civilians. Why they how it normally happens, did not select and did not squeeze out of them processor variations of Iskander and -400? Or designing of the microprocessor demands the full creative freedom and is possible only on inspiration, by the way, in garage?
And than you does not arrange Elbrus as a processor variation of Iskander and -400, Iskander and -400 it on the technological level of system far not advanced and cheap, with the concept and element basis 10-20 summer prescription, but powerful enough for parrying of threats of more developed armies.
Want to tell, in the technical plan backward, but in them gunpowder suffices?)
Elbrus, it also the cheap decision which at minimum expenses provides necessary needs, and at due level of implementation is possible and in a state to compete to the modern development.
That is, if to implement Elbrus in modern technical process, it can make a competition of production of Intel, AMD?