26

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

And  0 edgings are not present. A defect.

27

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
The theorist, a6300 in 4K overheats easily, only a6500 (sm the price)
Where comparing with  where  does not overheat in the same conditions?
Well , let will be 6500 but then it also is better than  since more buffer, and a stub is
You are not afraid, what it  as here?
Where results of tests? And percent any schoolboy can draw words, next  advertizing as well as in this test where against hybrid   delivered contrast   which had every chance only on loss
(yandex.207239200) lab net
A drag-net is not worse than any another, test with disconnected  at all converters.

So not I should tell it and to a tester at which in one converter that  rustles less and in other  already rustles more,  it there adjusted in roll

28

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
Where comparing with  where  does not overheat in the same conditions?
It in any does not overheat - there not for this purpose the battery pen made that in 5 minutes all would stop.
Where results of tests? And percent any schoolboy, can draw words
I also ask - are not afraid that "by a technique" it as merges, as in broad daylight on air.
As well as in this test where against hybrid   delivered contrast   which had every chance only on loss
At ixbt a technique same - take from archive any of the tested cameras who is pleasant, and compare .
Adding from 12/9/2016 11:59:
crossfire
Well , let will be 6500 but then it also is better than  since more buffer, and a stub is
Is not on sale yet. Somewhere it is better, and somewhere is worse. On the same 4k video 6500  LCD for energy saving, and even more strongly, than 6300 - a good gift to the operator in a sunny day.

29

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
I ceased to read for a long time already local reviews, to sense 0

30

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
It in any does not overheat - there not for this purpose the battery pen made that in 5 minutes all would stop.
Where at  the battery pen in a standard complete set? Where comparing with  the pen and without it? And and here presence of the pen and matrix overheating? What communication? In the pen the cooling device ? We theorize? Where comparing instead of assumptions?
I also ask - are not afraid that "by a technique" it as merges, as in broad daylight on air.
By what technique? By a technique in words  is the already most worse, at it of 1 % accuracy percent, on my technique, not terribly?:gigi:
At ixbt a technique same - take from archive any of the tested cameras who is pleasant, and compare .
And why they did not take? It is pleasant to me it is admissible 6500, is for it ?:D

31

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

Well and to what all came? After all admirers  with foam at a mouth proved, how it is good to remove the tiny easy camera. No other advantages in comparison with normal  after all are present, truth?
Let's lay aside comparing  with Kenon 100. We look at a carcass offered us.
1. Authors simply furiously try to praise it. For what? For the space price? Or for a sensor control ?
2. Well what it professional? Because delivered protection? Or for 350 frames from one charge?
3. To praise  for enhanced features with the battery pen is, generally, shamelessness top.
If you calculate for people memoryless on a material it is necessary to put the status "for  till 30 years".

32

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
Where at  the battery pen in a standard complete set?
And and here a standard complete set? To whom is it is necessary buy.
And and here presence of the pen and matrix overheating? What communication? In the pen the cooling device ?
Without the pen duration of shooting 4 video is restricted, and with the pen - is not present (under condition of cutting on half-hour pieces).
Why they did not take? It is pleasant to me it is admissible 6500, is for it ?
The beginning of sales in the Russian Federation on December, 12th. Look at a calendar.

33

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
And and here a standard complete set?
And besides that the camera price increases, that at  did not overheat it is necessary to buy  the pen? Ridiculously, and how compactness then? Quits 6500 it will be better:gigi:
Without the pen duration of shooting 4 video is restricted, and with the pen - is not present (under condition of cutting on half-hour pieces).
Restriction is not connected to overheating, the pen not the refrigerator wink
The beginning of sales in the Russian Federation on December, 12th. Look at a calendar.
And now look at a calendar and show digits with 6300:gigi:

34

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
By a technique in words  is the already most worse, at it of 1 % accuracy percent, on my technique, not terribly?
For you it is terrible.:D
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:28:
crossfire
Besides that the camera price increases, that at  did not overheat it is necessary to buy  the pen?
To remove video the good accumulator is necessary. And it is better three. Therefore if seriously to remove video, it is necessary to buy the pen. And a microphone. And it is a lot of that else.
Quits 6500 it will be better
a6500 Removes 4k with unpredictable duration. I.e. can overheat, and can and is not present.
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:29:
crossfire
Restriction is not connected to overheating, the pen not the refrigerator
But the accumulator an oven. wink

35

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
One more scrap with castrated  unit.
The main thing that is better X-T2:D

36

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
But the accumulator an oven.
Probably, in Samsunga ordered wink.

37

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
But the accumulator an oven.
And when we put  with additional accumulators that we receive a good heater:gigi:
To remove video
The videocamera is necessary. wink
Therefore if seriously to remove video, it is necessary to buy the pen. And a microphone. And it is a lot of that else.
From a pancake, of owners  really do victims of marketing, 4k-video is but is normal not :facepalm:
a6500 removes 4k with unpredictable duration. I.e. can overheat, and can and is not present.
Here therefore it is necessary to buy a videocamera for video, and a photocamera for a photo wink

38

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

The Voice
Well what it professional? Because delivered protection? Or for 350 frames from one charge?
Protection, quality of the manufacture, two slots, fast rates, optics dial-up.
To Praise  for enhanced features with the battery pen is, generally, shamelessness top.
With pen X-T2 weighs (and costs) approximately as much how many D500. Only at x-t2 it is possible to unfasten the pen, and D500 all right to drag everything even if all its possibilities are not necessary at present to you.
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:36:
crossfire
And when we put  with additional accumulators that we receive a good heater
On the contrary, it is heated nothing.
From a pancake, of owners  really do victims of marketing, 4k-video is but is normal not 
If the result is not important, take a mobile phone and remove.
Here therefore it is necessary to buy a videocamera for video, and a photocamera for a photo
It can and is necessary, I  remove video for 2-3 minutes in a month.

39

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
And D500 all right to drag everything even if all its possibilities are not necessary at present to you.

This camera is bought just with the full realization of that that by its possibilities still as are necessary
With pen X-T2 weighs (and costs) approximately as much how many D500
Nightmare,  such heavy that? And still yikes
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:41:
IvUs
If the result is not important, take a mobile phone and remove.
And if the result of video is important that take a videocamera and remove, and here  is not clear:insane:
It can and is necessary, I  remove video for 2-3 minutes in a month.
then  the pen and than hinders restriction in 30 at the sleepyhead (and other)?:insane:

40

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
With pen X-T2 weighs (and costs) approximately as much how many D500.
, unambiguously.

41

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
Well as the variant 6300, easy, fast (there powerful hybrid ), fair 4, costs noticeably more cheaply , i.e. on  it as a whole at level , somewhere is better, somewhere is worse, but cost more adequate
Yes small there a difference in the price, 106  against 120. But at Fudzhi the optics is, control more convenient and  regarding a photo heaped more up.

42

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

Yuri_B
Yes small there a difference in the price, 106  against 120. But at Fudzhi the optics is
On the sleepyhead the optics too is, + through a native adapter all optics on a-maunt which on  works also well as on them , and there it is more at the sleepyhead of variants since  than pieces of glass
  regarding a photo heaped more up.
Yes it is fine? On AF  of the sleepyhead it is better, the buffer big, and the stub is in a carcass 5-axial, in my opinion as regards a photo just at the sleepyhead it is better, well unless the matrix at the sleepyhead can hardly is worse
And video of the sleepyhead removes is better, in fair 4 and the codec at it is better, even for the equal price the sleepyhead looks better but here  was greedy certainly wink

43

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

Yuri_B
Yes small there a difference in the price, 106  against 120. But at Fudzhi the optics is
At  two fast , , normal 4K. a6300 - marketing , knowingly it on fast on 6500 changed, there though it is clear for what money is paid.
DimaM
Plechivkrov, unambiguously.
You are witty as always.
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:54:
crossfire
And video of the sleepyhead removes is better, in fair 4 and the codec at it is better
You not in a subject absolutely. At 6300 4k 24 fps - with awful rolling-shatterom. 30 fps - with  1.23
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:56:
crossfire
On the sleepyhead the optics too is, + through a native adapter all optics on a-maunt which on  works also well as on them , and there it is more at the sleepyhead of variants since  than pieces of glass
I do not remember something in profile E-krop to a subject of special delights concerning an adapter, anybody in  does not consider it.
Adding from 12/9/2016 12:58:
crossfire
On AF  of the sleepyhead it is better, the buffer big, and the stub is in a carcass 5-axial,
You do not come off on a6500, it costs the same 120 , as x-t2

44

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
D500 all right to drag all
All right in sports hall if some honeycombs gram cause such response. I am far not the sportsman, this summer in Crimea for days on end since morning till the night dragged a five-copeck coin on a neck and in a hand and any problems did not test.
"Professional"  with exaggerated iso, not disconnected ,  image quality, the poor control, expensive lenses, half of Ff-chambers including A7II - forgive are more expensive, it is necessary to be over fan Fuji that such to buy for the marked total.

45

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
You not in a subject absolutely. At 6300 4k 24 fps - with awful rolling-shatterom.
There we already about 6500 conducted speech wink
Adding from 12/9/2016 13:02:
IvUs
You do not come off on a6500, it costs the same 120 , as x-t2
Means and compare xt2 it is necessary with 6500 instead of with 6300 which noticeably is cheaper, it is less 90.. Costs wink

46

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

sergtrav
"Professional"  with exaggerated iso, not disconnected ,  image quality,
As the person who long studied a question I can tell, - you are not right. Were simply typed myths from talkers.
I am far not the sportsman, this summer in Crimea for days on end since morning till the night dragged a five-copeck coin on a neck and in a hand and any problems did not test
Also what, brought something such for the sake of what it was necessary to drag superfluous kilogram?
Expensive lenses
They of that stand.
More expensively half of Ff-chambers, including A7II -
From 7 at the sleepyhead uncompromising A7R2. Also costs accordingly. Remaining or it is frank , or are killed on features.
Adding from 12/9/2016 13:08:
crossfire
Means and compare xt2 it is necessary with 6500
Well , here the table https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-6500

47

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
On the sleepyhead the optics too is, + through a native adapter all optics on a-maunt which on  works also well as on them , and there it is more than at the sleepyhead of variants since  than pieces of glass
Native  optics at the Sleepyhead .  often bulky and at the horse prices, and with an adapter on A-maunt too it is bulky it turns out. The Fudzhevsky system for choice noticeably is more interesting some glasses.
On AF  of the sleepyhead it is better, and the stub is in a carcass 5-axial, in my opinion as regards a photo just at the sleepyhead it is better, well unless the matrix at the sleepyhead can hardly is worse
All on the contrary smile. The stub in 6300 is not present, it is in 6500, but there and the price the same 120 . A matrix in the Sleepyhead and Fudzhi, apparently, identical (only at the Sleepyhead , and at Fudzhi H-transovaja the version).  I did not compare, but  as one write that at X-T2 the best tracking  in a photo among  along with E-M1mkII. But mark that in videomode  works for the Sleepyhead is better. Besides, at Fudzhi a carcass , a lock on 1/8000 with, the view-finder is hardly better, a screen of normal proportions, instead of , 2 cards. As a whole, concerning analogs from the Sleepyhead it is possible to recognize the price of Fudzhika reasonable. Other question that all flagman  are a little overestimated.

48

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

crossfire
There we already about 6500 conducted speech
Re-read article Arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional  Fujifilm X-T2", #42

49

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

The Voice
No other advantages in comparison with normal  after all are present, truth?
Lie. Article showed that already at  there are no advantages in comparison with . That's all. And that the sizes at a failure from a mirror decrease are all and so knew what here to consider?

50

Re: Article arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional Fujifilm X-T2"

IvUs
Re-read article Arguing iXBT.com: "the Review and testing professional  Fujifilm X-T2", #42
to read that? I to you speak what to compare it is necessary xt2 and 6500 time at them the price identical, or I am not right?:spy:
Well , here the table https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-6500
Instead of, 6500 is cheaper on 200$, well  generally:mad:
Further control - at the sleepyhead , is plus, the joystick  in an urn, these second-hand articles:gigi:
At the sleepyhead of 425 phase sensors, at  and hundred parts are not present
At the sleepyhead of half-minute of video without , at  10 minutes (and only with  30):lol:
At the sleepyhead fhd can 100k \with write
At  video only , at the sleepyhead 24/25p Full Width
From the sleepyhead  built in and places does not occupy
Easier and it is less than sleepyhead
Well simply stub and more capacious buffer at the sleepyhead already wrote earlier