Subektivnye of sensation are not translated in digits on determination, whether it be tactile sensations or weight and the sizes.
All is not necessary in one heap, tactile sensations in any way in digits not to express, and not to compare objectively, and weight and the sizes - quite. Another matter that here at all the requirement different. But here never heard, that someone said that the five-copeck coin can be hung up simply through a shoulder and it not to note. But it is a lot of from whom heard that search in pair to a five-copeck coin for more compact and easy camera, but with decent quality of a picture. And if earlier it was addition now for many (not for everything, it is finite) it appears high-grade changeover of a five-copeck coin (and especially).
At you sensations of 800 gram - small and easy, at the owner 800 - huge and heavy, at me the relation as to budgetary , too small to be really convenient.
Yes, it is all truly, everyone estimates in own way. But not it understands everyone, and gives advice to the person, being guided by the, instead of its preferences Here someone what for 2 with 6D suggests to compare, though it is absolutely different cameras under different needs. It is possible still with any truck of similar cost to compare and prove that the truck on three heads is better, as takes away many tons of a load, and - simply toy in this plan At everyone the needs. But if it to accept, it will quickly be clarified what to argue at a forum there is nothing
27/2 at Fudzi all the same is not present
Yes, there not 2, but 2.8 actually. But what it changes as a matter of fact?
Yesterday came into a warehouse - lies for 120 , any agiotage
Well so it sometimes happens available, then disappears, see, if it is interesting. Though, I think, it is fast already should.
We compare 80 + 100/2.8 to Fudzi plus... Plus... Plus... Or 80 + 300/4 with Fudzi plus... Plus... Plus...
And what for to me 100 or 300? And not only me... It that, typical lenses with which people on streets run?