No other advantages in comparison with normal after all are present, truth?
Lie. Article showed that already at there are no advantages in comparison with . That's all. And that the sizes at a failure from a mirror decrease are all and so knew what here to consider?
Well as is not present? Well it is impossible so unscrupulously to lie, honestly.
How many there is second-hand FF Kenona? How many stand qualitative (not , and simply qualitative, with a constant hole 4) lenses?
And how many there is this carcass and glasses to it?
Principal advantage not that there the mirror, is a lack. From the technical point of view of the Sleepyhead of FF - the excellent camera.
But many years, there an ecosystem huge let out. For 120000 it is possible to buy a carcass plus some good glasses. And here one a carcass. And then still glasses, the pen etc.
You unless do not see, what you plant on money?.
Adding from 12/9/2016 16:58:
Alex Usenko :
About I bombed that just separately wrote a sentence, and here at - not
So professional counters they just for bombed.
But on unless bomb?
And on which the carcass for 1700 euros is still necessary ?
Just about. I here while went, thought about it. In my opinion, it it is possible to try to pathos travelers. For a size and protection. But the made pro on it will never be moved.
Adding from 12/9/2016 17:09:
Well what it professional? Because delivered protection? Or for 350 frames from one charge?
Protection, quality of the manufacture, two slots, fast rates, optics dial-up.
Here this most important thing because of what I got.
At a people considerable quantity generally the perverted understanding of a word "professional" and an adjective "professional".
I will not explain, it is useless. I will result evident an example following from your answer.
You focused attention to specifications. Then, it turns out, if the rich major buys this camera, moreover with an optics dial-up - it automatically becomes the pro, yes?
Generally, the most simple criterion to define, this carcass to concerns "about" or not is through any time (in 6 months, we we admit), to look how many editions of large mass-media bought for the photodepartments this technics.
I.e. to understand, whether real pros accept this for the useful tool or not.
It is possible to look on the other hand. On classification of the pro.
1. A landscape. Does not transit, it is not enough pixels, the wide angle is not present.
2. Wedding. The wide angle is not present.
3. The reporting, sports. And I did not note something, that at it was superfast and supertenacious . It 7 can compete to Kenon?
So where it to attach? As I already wrote, or to the climber from weight and place saving. Or to the strit-photographer. But there the pro is not present.
.. professional this carcass in any way does not pull. The vendor very much would like to climb in this niche that it is more .
But it is attempt with unsuitable means. It is necessary to be trained still...