Samsung and , is finite with inflated prices, but their smarts are at least functional and do not try stuff.
The same xrn 3 pro 3/32 to the Russian white retail - associates, is offered for 17 (against 24 at low ), about gray I do not stammer at all. Thus much cheaper smart soils this in stuff. Plus the twentieth range at , a minus 38. Worse the battery, is worse the processor.
Excuse that I am responsible for other author.
In my modest judgement of Eppl always stuff, i.e. I do not speak about failure versions of type 5, and I speak about low versions 6 and 7 Ajfonov...
At Asus the battery is worse only on a paper, and it practically does not concede in life Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 Pro to me is with what to compare, i.e. both smarts are accessible. For example the smart spends for video about 6-7 % on a film, on idea at a total charge should lose video of 13-14 hours without a stop.
Worse the processor, , again doubtfully. By the way, pay attention on Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, it not seems to you, what Xiaomi did a foolish think? After all they delivered this processor on PRO the version, instead of . By the way, look how many costs not about the version in Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 - 19999 i.e. 20.
Personally this Asus (ZE552KL) was pleasant to me more, than for example Aplle 6s. Lives longer, accuracy and speed of obtaining of the geodata is better, supports flash cards both and . And even photos are pleasant to me more...
Once again I will repeat that Asus ZE552KL is the competitor of Samsung A7 in cost in 30, to them still it is possible to add Moto X Play and new Moto Z Play.
All statements about constant glitches - only words.
This phone has responses in Russia, and already it is a lot of them.