476

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

[s] What charm: invent essence. Then invent its "properties". After begin to "comprehend" all it, to a campaign considering fabricated, with other visionaries.:rolleyes: [/s]

477

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

alekov
Considering fabricated
In age-old times seriously considered "how many angels dances on a needle edge".
Nonsenses since then did not decrease.
And still to someone  to invent new religion.
Adding from 12/19/2016 19:29:
The Baby bird
Other reality, except physical
And it is, a nonphysical reality?
Probably, if to say lies, yes.
To say lies that the fantastic character can have "scientific" "determination".
If to have courage of honesty:
(from an armor. realis - real, the valid) - the philosophical term used in different values as existing generally; objectively shown world; the fragment of a universum making data domain of an appropriate science; objectively existing phenomena, the facts, that is existing really.
Reality - Wikipedia
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Adding from 12/19/2016 19:31:
forevic
micnic
But at a sight at them it is clear that these problems are.

Quite successful.
Problems - yes, are.
Problems in interear .
Confused, suggested, near.

478

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

The Baby bird
And there can not be there nothing, noteworthy. For, a basis "curve".
Prefer to do outputs before learning? , though "scientific" in such approach - zero then you have no need and to argue on a science.

479

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

forevic
Prefer to do outputs before learning?
I to you already named the arguments. To you still it is necessary to repeat? The C of first time does not reach?:down:

480

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

The Baby bird
It is not quite assured that "empty talk" is understood by you as a word.
Lie.
I Think, anything, except a complete negation you of other reality, except the physical.
Show any another with the registration of requirements to "a scientific hypothesis".

481

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

forevic
Prefer to do outputs before learning?
[s] The Mirror is far? It is Perhaps quite good before to advise faith, to investigate into its main theses ? [/s]:rolleyes:

482

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

The Baby bird
In section of quantum physics or cosmology. How think, such purely scientific hypothesis how "the horizon of events" and which reality is behind this horizon concerns what reality?
Wanted what to tell? Except philosophical mutter, naturally.

483

Re: The creator (God) as purely scientific hypothesis.

Alex G.K.
Wanted What to tell?
Simply I laugh at your requirement of "observability".:D
Except philosophical mutter, naturally.
Also did not begin even for, it is not meaningful in your case. :-\ Exceptional examples of objects exact the sciences which do not have explicit physical reviewers. Already about other types of "realities" I also do not stammer. For you it and at all "space" will be.:p