#### Topic: Dynamic or visual totals

Hello, misters!

On air our constant heading "They want strange"

There are the products divided into types and categories, there are responses.

Actually, jobs

For the purpose of information aggregation on a call of the client following priorities are considered:

- If some types of the response are put down, and one of them "Agrees", the type "Agree" is considered and types "Failure" are not considered and "Thinks"

- If the response type "Agree" is not put down, but types "Thinks" also "Failure" the type "Thinks" is considered are put down and the type "Failure" is not considered

- The type "Failure" has a priority only over type "is not sounded"

Values of flags: With = Agreed, = Thinks, About = the Failure, = it is not sounded

For one call it is considered max from responses, for aggregation on the operator the total of calls (on max) is considered

Like all is simple and in such statement I solved the task by creation of five additional fields filled approximately so

`iif (row_number () over (partition by t.call_id, t.employee_id, p. [product_name] order by resp_id) =1,1,0) as sumpr`

And further substituted in how it turned out

```
SCOPE (Descendants ([Product]. [Product Name], LEAVES), [Measures]. [Cnt Act Offers]);
this = [Measures]. [Sumpr];
end scope;
```

All works as is described, but it appeared that THEY wanted not it, and dynamic totals depending on that is pulled out in the report, i.e. for an example (one call of one operator)

Type, Name, Chan, the Flag

AND, A1, X, WITH

AND, A1, Y, ABOUT

AND, A2, X,

AND, A2, Y, ABOUT

B, B1, X, WITH

B, B1, Y,

B, B2, X, ABOUT

B, B2, Y,

C, C1, X, WITH

D, D1, X,

Such results are necessary:

Type, Name, Chan, With, , About, , the Total

A, A1, X, 1,0,0,0,1

A, A1, Y, 0,0,1,0,1

A, A2, X, 0,1,0,0,1

A, A2, Y, 0,0,1,0,1

B, B1, X, 1,0,0,0,1

B, B1, Y, 0,0,0,1,1

B, B2, X, 0,0,1,0,1

B, B2, Y, 0,0,0,1,1

C, C1, X, 1,0,0,0,1

D, D1, X, 0,1,0,0,1

The total, 3,2,3,2,10

Type, Name, With, , About, , the Total

AND, A1,1,0,0,0,1

AND, A2,0,1,0,0,1

B, B1,1,0,0,0,1

B, B2,0,0,1,0,1

C, C1,1,0,0,0,1

D, D1,0,1,0,0,1

The total, 3,2,1, 0,6

Type, Chan, With, , About, , the Total

A, X, 1,0,0,0,1

A, Y, 0,0,1,0,1

B, X, 1,0,0,0,1

B, Y, 0,0,0,1,1

C, X, 1,0,0,0,1

D, X, 0,1,0,0,1

The total, 3,1,1, 1,6

Type, With, , About, , the Total

AND, 1,0,0,0,1

B, 1,0,0,0,1

C, 1,0,0,0,1

D, 0,1,0,0,1

The total, 3,1,0,0,4

Chan, With, , About, , the Total

X, 1,0,0,0,1

Y, 0,0,1,0,1

The total, 1,0,1,0,2

How it can be implemented on MDX?

That is once again a problem that dynamic totals for other measurements depending on what of these measurements are used in layout of a cube are necessary.

Help, please