1

Topic: Dynamic or visual totals

Hello, misters!
On air our constant heading "They want strange"
There are the products divided into types and categories, there are responses.
Actually,  jobs

wrote:

For the purpose of information aggregation on a call of the client following priorities are considered:
- If some types of the response are put down, and one of them "Agrees", the type "Agree" is considered and types "Failure" are not considered and "Thinks"
- If the response type "Agree" is not put down, but types "Thinks" also "Failure" the type "Thinks" is considered are put down and the type "Failure" is not considered
- The type "Failure" has a priority only over type "is not sounded"
Values of flags: With = Agreed,  = Thinks, About = the Failure,  = it is not sounded
For one call it is considered max from responses, for aggregation on the operator the total of calls (on max) is considered

Like all is simple and in such statement I solved the task by creation of five additional fields filled approximately so

iif (row_number () over (partition by t.call_id, t.employee_id, p. [product_name] order by resp_id) =1,1,0) as sumpr

And further substituted in  how it turned out

SCOPE (Descendants ([Product]. [Product Name], LEAVES), [Measures]. [Cnt Act Offers]);
this = [Measures]. [Sumpr];
end scope;

All works as is described, but it appeared that THEY wanted not it, and dynamic totals depending on that is pulled out in the report, i.e. for an example (one call of one operator)
Type, Name, Chan, the Flag
AND, A1, X, WITH
AND, A1, Y, ABOUT
AND, A2, X,
AND, A2, Y, ABOUT
B, B1, X, WITH
B, B1, Y,
B, B2, X, ABOUT
B, B2, Y,
C, C1, X, WITH
D, D1, X,
Such results are necessary:
Type, Name, Chan, With, , About, , the Total
A, A1, X, 1,0,0,0,1
A, A1, Y, 0,0,1,0,1
A, A2, X, 0,1,0,0,1
A, A2, Y, 0,0,1,0,1
B, B1, X, 1,0,0,0,1
B, B1, Y, 0,0,0,1,1
B, B2, X, 0,0,1,0,1
B, B2, Y, 0,0,0,1,1
C, C1, X, 1,0,0,0,1
D, D1, X, 0,1,0,0,1
The total, 3,2,3,2,10
Type, Name, With, , About, , the Total
AND, A1,1,0,0,0,1
AND, A2,0,1,0,0,1
B, B1,1,0,0,0,1
B, B2,0,0,1,0,1
C, C1,1,0,0,0,1
D, D1,0,1,0,0,1
The total, 3,2,1, 0,6
Type, Chan, With, , About, , the Total
A, X, 1,0,0,0,1
A, Y, 0,0,1,0,1
B, X, 1,0,0,0,1
B, Y, 0,0,0,1,1
C, X, 1,0,0,0,1
D, X, 0,1,0,0,1
The total, 3,1,1, 1,6
Type, With, , About, , the Total
AND, 1,0,0,0,1
B, 1,0,0,0,1
C, 1,0,0,0,1
D, 0,1,0,0,1
The total, 3,1,0,0,4
Chan, With, , About, , the Total
X, 1,0,0,0,1
Y, 0,0,1,0,1
The total, 1,0,1,0,2
How it can be implemented on MDX?
That is once again a problem that dynamic totals for other measurements depending on what of these measurements are used in layout of a cube are necessary.
Help, please

2

Re: Dynamic or visual totals

I here long thought over 1 table - 1 call of 1 operator and did not understand sense
And on an output did not understand - there should be 5 tables???

3

Re: Dynamic or visual totals

Feodor wrote:

I here long thought over 1 table - 1 call of 1 operator and did not understand sense
And on an output did not understand - there should be 5 tables???

During one call one operator can offer one client some products and receive on these sentences answers (the consent, thinks, a failure). What is not clear?

Feodor wrote:

and on an output did not understand - there should be 5 tables???

I like once wrote in title and two times repeated in the message that these five tables - variants of aggregation of one field depending on layout of a cube. And at levels in the form of step-by-step "swerving" for me works, dynamic totals are necessary.

4

Re: Dynamic or visual totals

Larr ` wrote:

That is not clear?....
I like once wrote in title and two times repeated.

So you do not sell an elephant)
Use  for each measurement

5

Re: Dynamic or visual totals

StarikNavy wrote:

use  for each measurement

I and so use  for each measurement. But, if attentively to look at examples of tables, a problem that totals on the agent and-or date should depend on the pulled out measurements. Accordingly, as far as I understand olap-cubes it is impossible to create static totals for the agent and date. It is necessary in  to tire out this level  like "iif on axes measurements such total for agent-date to take from one field, if others, from another" lie
Somebody can help with such construction?