1

Topic: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Joke . Simply like quitted, and still anybody wrote nothing.

2

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, PZI, you wrote: PZI> a joke . Simply like quitted, and still anybody wrote nothing. We search for the java-programmer with experience in java 9 from three years

3

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, neFormal, you wrote: F> we search for the java-programmer with experience in java 9 from three years  it is necessary to search in indium, there precisely find

4

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, PZI, you wrote: PZI> a joke . Simply like quitted, and still anybody wrote nothing. A pancake, I wait when in SDKMAN appears. There while only ea  with which I can not . And as appeared - to devils at once all I will translate if it will be efficient.

5

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, elmal, you wrote: PZI>> a joke . Simply like quitted, and still anybody wrote nothing. E> a pancake, I wait when in SDKMAN appears. There while only ea  with which I can not . And as appeared - to devils at once all I will translate if it will be efficient. And what for it is necessary? I esteemed the list of features and anything interesting to myself did not find. Sometime I will get, of course, but to hurry up sense I do not see.

6

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, PZI, you wrote: PZI> a joke . Simply like quitted, and still anybody wrote nothing. Write, problems with reverse compatibility because of modularity. It is necessary to launch a heap of a software (including ) with a special flag that worked.

7

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> And what for it is necessary? I esteemed the list of features and anything interesting to myself did not find. Sometime I will get, of course, but to hurry up sense I do not see. Well, at the expense of compact lines at me reduction of occupied storage of percent on 30 is planned. Well and at the expense of modularity too it should less storage be guzzled.

8

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

It was necessary already    under change API as disappeared we tell javax.xml.bind. DatatypeConverter

9

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

R> it was necessary already    under change API as disappeared we tell javax.xml.bind. DatatypeConverter it is strange, even @Depricated was not, as it they so  from a shoulder

10

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

R> it was necessary already    under change API as disappeared we tell javax.xml.bind. DatatypeConverter In  slander that it  did not disappear, but slightly hid, and that it can be enticed from a mink so.

11

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Better they by default would make that all well and who would like that already were played in modularity

12

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

R> it is better they by default would make that all well and who would like that already were played in modularity All truly, it would be unique the correct decision. But it  , .

13

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, raydac, you wrote: R> it is better they by default would make that all well and who would like that already were played in modularity Such variant already was - security manager - not

14

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, neFormal, you wrote: F> Hello, PZI, you wrote: PZI>> a joke . Simply like quitted, and still anybody wrote nothing. F> we search for the java-programmer with experience in java 9 from three years the Salary worthy? Where to send the abstract?

15

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, javacoder, you wrote: R>> it was necessary already    under change API as disappeared we tell javax.xml.bind. DatatypeConverter J> it is strange, even @Depricated was not, as it they so  from a shoulder Just this  unit (as well as a little others) https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/a … mmary.html It does not boot by default and will be remote in the future version.

16

Re: Well, who already passed on 9-ku?

Hello, serb, you wrote: S> Such variant already was - security manager - not  Well, is visible so the people estimated  the given feature. Similar they decided to recoup on modularity.