1

Topic: Minuses OLED?

All greetings. Can prompt, what minuses at  TV, in comparison with ? Search in Google yielded doubtful result, for a lot of the old information, like absence 4 (though now 4 full it is full). But while searched, had time to come across "burn-up of pixels", plainly a little that understood, but was surprised, how at TV for 130 that can that to burn out. So I will be grateful, if who  paints more in detail.
Still a question, "narrower": In what LG OLED55B6V loses SONY KD-49XE9005

2

Re: Minuses OLED?

At  almost all in pluses (which parity at what is present) in relation to ICE.
Burning-off still early to judge, not so much they had time to serve at real owners. T that if the purse allows, take on changeover to the ICE - will simply go bananas from the image.
Not all clearly longevity as usage experience is not great still.
The real owner, of course, tells more. Use search.

3

Re: Minuses OLED?

dreamless :
At  almost all in pluses (which parity at what is present) in relation to ICE.
Burning-off still early to judge, not so much they had time to serve at real owners. T that if the purse allows, take on changeover to the ICE - will simply go bananas from the image.
Not all clearly longevity as usage experience is not great still.
The real owner, of course, tells more. Use search.

here very much all is fuzzy with periods... "Longevity" who that has till now big-bellied, huge TV sets. And who bought that , and 8 years with it. Here it is long term? To me probably it is not important, serves to me  10 years or not because I doubt that it at me stays longer 3 years, well 5 the maximum-maximum is direct. And if at it to burn out already there that that begins through a floor of year - what for it such is necessary.
At other forum told that long on a static picture it is impossible to sit, here besides - a problem with a vagueness periods. "Long", it delivered on a pause and departed... But on how many? For 20 minutes, and already there will be a risk, or at 12 o'clock?
I invite in a subject of real owners...

4

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
Generally, for questions about  nearby there is a separate subject.
From myself I will tell that after the lapse of use half a year  I am happy practically with all.  is the last century, such here the output arises. About the residual image - if on the screen to leave the image with any very light sections of minutes on 10 yes, hardly noticeable trace remains, but it at all a minus since it is removed after some seconds. In general, no problems with it are present, about which it is necessary though somehow to worry.

5

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
For 3 years if, take and do not think of minuses. Especially, in the first seconds of review about minuses forget for ever.
Good luck with purchase!:beer:
Concerning comparing  of the sleepyhead with   (as, actually and any the heaped most up  in comparison with the most simple )... Incomparable things basically. In one they are equal - in dynamic resolution. In remaining - a ski on a head above the sleepyhead.

6

Re: Minuses OLED?

dreamless :
Rocky55
For 3 years if, take and do not think of minuses. Especially, in the first seconds of review about minuses forget for ever.
Good luck with purchase!:beer:
Concerning comparing  of the sleepyhead with   (as, actually and any the heaped most up  in comparison with the most simple )... Incomparable things basically. In one they are equal - in dynamic resolution. In remaining - a ski on a head above the sleepyhead.

What does "dynamic resolution" mean?) Uplavljanka?

7

Re: Minuses OLED?

is a resolution not on a static picture, and in driving. Both at , and at , this index within 300-400 horizontal lines. In comparison with, for example, with resolution in a statics, if  - 1080 lines.

8

Re: Minuses OLED?

And in smoothness the image as? Really than the sleepyhead will be worse, with their super-puper ?

9

Re: Minuses OLED?

What OLED not the best choice for daily game on PS4 is truth?

10

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
By and large,  - angrily.  a picture.
The ski does not lose, at least, the sleepyhead and in smoothness.

11

Re: Minuses OLED?

dreamless
"" it does a picture of smooth on that and "" if it is a question about 100hz TV, and "" it then when TV 50hz.
If at you PDP TV that you not the fan of these algorithms for is reached effect of "performance". But it does not mean that they bad. To everyone the. wink
Rocky55
Lacks OLED:
1) "Burning-off" / the Residual Image
2) More low definition in dynamics (but it not a serious lack. Only for "big-eyed" smile)
These are lacks in comparison with Panas 65dxr900 and Sony 65ZD9.
Output: if do not use OLED as the monitor it is necessary to take! wink

12

Re: Minuses OLED?

Lux
1) "Burning-off" / the Residual Image
It is already possible to translate safely in myths.:gigi:

13

Re: Minuses OLED?

Lux :
dreamless
"" it does a picture of smooth on that and "" if it is a question about 100hz TV, and "" it then when TV 50hz.
If at you PDP TV that you not the fan of these algorithms for is reached effect of "performance". But it does not mean that they bad. To everyone the. wink
Rocky55
Lacks OLED:
1) "Burning-off" / the Residual Image
2) More low definition in dynamics (but it not a serious lack. Only for "big-eyed" smile)
These are lacks in comparison with Panas 65dxr900 and Sony 65ZD9.
Output: if do not use OLED as the monitor it is necessary to take! wink

What is "the Residual image" - I understood, and here that such "Burning-off" - still is not present. Or this one and too?
As yet absolutely understood that you imply under "more low definition in dynamics"...

14

Re: Minuses OLED?

Crowntes Black :
Unique minus:
Low dynamic resolution sad

And what is it?)

15

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
People with  write that almost do not note detail loss in dynamics. So also to you, perhaps, it is not necessary to pay attention to it. Pass on  from plasmas of "the last edition" and say that are glad (and I personally trust them).
What at you was or is now as TV?

16

Re: Minuses OLED?

dreamless :
Rocky55
People with  write that almost do not note detail loss in dynamics. So also to you, perhaps, it is not necessary to pay attention to it. Pass on  from plasmas of "the last edition" and say that are glad (and I personally trust them).
What at you was or is now as TV?

Now UE40J6240.
But nevertheless, please, explain a simple language - that this such...

17

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
What is "the Residual image" - I understood, and here that such "Burning-off" - still is not present. Or this one and too?
Type in Google "OLED Burn-in" and see a large quantity of complaints and photos.

18

Re: Minuses OLED?

gavs :
Rocky55
What is "the Residual image" - I understood, and here that such "Burning-off" - still is not present. Or this one and too?
Type in Google "OLED Burn-in" and see a large quantity of complaints and photos.

That feeling when looked at minute video, and decided not to buy big_smile
https://youtu.be/HTpCxM0Z-ZM

19

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
You want to learn about resolution reduction in dynamics on ? Here such business... You, when look present TV, note image blurring (it and is IT) on fast scenes? A question without a dirty trick. If do not note, everything is all right. At  all will be as. That is, not worse.
More in detail about 300 lines in dynamics, look here: Plasma TV sets of Panasonic 2013 (a part 7), #2553

20

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
But nevertheless, please, explain a simple language - that this such...
the Question about dynamic resolution

21

Re: Minuses OLED?

dreamless :
Rocky55
You want to learn about resolution reduction in dynamics on ? Here such business... You, when look present TV, note image blurring (it and is IT) on fast scenes? A question without a dirty trick. If do not note, everything is all right. At  all will be as. That is, not worse.
More in detail about 300 lines in dynamics, look here: Plasma TV sets of Panasonic 2013 (a part 7), #2553

Understand, I cannot understand that you imply "image blurring". But yes it is fine, I will make easier. It is necessary to find a roller (and it is better a little) in 4, a-lja the test for smoothness (by the way if is such - be so kind as, throw off), to look at it some times on the TV. Then to go to shop, and to look at it on , well and at the same time on  TV, sleepyheads - 49XE9005. If I do note that on  is worse - that not destiny, I will take probably sleepyheads. Well and if I will not note - I will take )
One trouble - rollers that that is not present (

22

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55 :
Understand, I cannot understand that you imply "image blurring". But yes it is fine, I will make easier. It is necessary to find a roller (and it is better a little) in 4, a-lja the test for smoothness (by the way if is such - be so kind as, throw off), to look at it some times on the TV. Then to go to shop, and to look at it on , well and at the same time on  TV, sleepyheads - 49XE9005. If I do note that on  is worse - that not destiny, I will take probably sleepyheads. Well and if I will not note - I will take )

I wrote to you. If note. That is, a keyword "if". Do not note, so. Then, all is simple. Anything it is not necessary to compare.  it is better . Simply take it. And you are the winner. But. Even if would note, all the same, the choice is obvious. ONLY .
But, since you, all the same, intend to compare obvious, it is quite good. Be convinced, what precipice between these two technologies. I advise to look a contrast content in a dark location if it is possible.

23

Re: Minuses OLED?

dreamless :

Rocky55 :
Understand, I cannot understand that you imply "image blurring". But yes it is fine, I will make easier. It is necessary to find a roller (and it is better a little) in 4, a-lja the test for smoothness (by the way if is such - be so kind as, throw off), to look at it some times on the TV. Then to go to shop, and to look at it on , well and at the same time on  TV, sleepyheads - 49XE9005. If I do note that on  is worse - that not destiny, I will take probably sleepyheads. Well and if I will not note - I will take )

I wrote to you. If note. That is, a keyword "if". Do not note, so. Then, all is simple. Anything it is not necessary to compare.  it is better . Simply take it. And you are the winner. But. Even if would note, all the same, the choice is obvious. ONLY .
But, since you, all the same, intend to compare obvious, it is quite good. Be convinced, what precipice between these two technologies. I advise to look a contrast content in a dark location if it is possible.

As a picture I know a difference) Walked before purchase to look  already, and there on  came across, and . Now that me excites the only thing - smoothness of this picture. As soon as I will find  - I will go to check.

24

Re: Minuses OLED?

Rocky55
Now that me excites the only thing - smoothness of this picture
It is necessary to understand that "smoothness of a picture" and "picture blur" is not same.

25

Re: Minuses OLED?

From minuses OLED:
1. Nasty . On determination, is worse than at LCD: it is caused by technology singularities. In a type of it the technology, alas, dies even faster, than plasmas died. By the way on plasmas  was for the same reason worse, than at LCD.
2. Nasty .
3. It is impossible to look old films. On any  and  LCD Sony old films look perfectly! HD on a cable too not so.
As a result:  - for fans of the modern dark films. LCD - for sports and old films, for HD-channels.  quitted too . LCD - more general-purpose. Who does not look off-the-air channels who does not look sports who does not look old films - only , without variants. By the way, the boxing on  looks rather - too a bonus!:laugh: