Topic: Choice of a matrix for observation cameras: Sony IMX290 vs Sony IMX291.
Read that it is better than a matrix of Sony, than remaining (less detailing falls in the conditions of the bad illuminance). But what to select? At Sony at present found two STARVIS matrixes Full HD - IMX290 and IMX291. As the processor of handling of a signal selected Nextchip (AHD-H the standard). Between these matrixes there is the basic difference on quality of a picture day and night? Read that in IMX290 there is a dynamic range extension on technology Digital OverLap (DOL) which copes with this task, than Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) is better.
Did not find comparative tests between IMX290 and IMX291, saw only tests where matrixes STARVIS compare to matrixes IMX322 and IMX323. Though if to look at the price, units with matrixes IMX290 and technology DOL are more expensive, than IMX291 with WDR. Prompt please what of matrixes is better, and whether there is the basic difference on quality between technologies WDR and DOL. All in advance thanks.