1

Topic: RadeonHD 6850

And again hello:D.
Question, I hope the simple. Got to me  . With plans to translate the interface  to it, and in   nowadays used Geforce GTX970, delivered in . Prompt, on what driver it to use? And that them for \ much somehow divorced... (Ati\radeon\radeonsi\amdgpu\amdgpu-pro\fglrx).

2

Re: RadeonHD 6850

For Radeon HD 6850 it makes sense to use  driver AMD Catalyst (still known as fglrx).
The free driver put radeon (is a part xf86-video-ati) is still necessary.

3

Re: RadeonHD 6850

Spetros
... How much I remember to what read on different  sites, fglrx often delays with support new X and kernels? (At me  Sid-testing + in places at all Experimental). Not hunting in a galosh to sit down after the next pack of new things (them sometimes for a day till 30-40 packets comes).

4

Re: RadeonHD 6850

d76
fglrx often delays with support new X and kernels?
There is a such. Your scenario of usage assumes frequent update of a kernel and X?
At me  Sid-testing + in places at all Experimental
On these branches probability in a galosh to sit down after the next pack of new things is present always.

5

Re: RadeonHD 6850

Spetros
Fie  3, meanwhile with  especially not  (there was rake periodically when used a bucket liquorix and aptosid). Now that kernel which in DebSide arrives, with that and I live (on not so clear me to the reason liquorix at start of system does not accept the password for the scrambled disks, and a standard bucket - at once).
again I will ask, to try to deliver fglrx or radeon? (Excuse, experience with such  and in Windows is not present, and in  - is not present ABSOLUTELY:D).

6

Re: RadeonHD 6850

d76
Taki again I will ask, to try to deliver fglrx or radeon?
So, and what you want from the videocard?
2D/3D productivity at fglrx above.
And for the graphic interface quite suffices radeon.
Can to begin with it and try.

7

Re: RadeonHD 6850

Spetros
Well in general, already I try smile. (Houses a cooler on  I will replace, as I will come). Costs plows, for a change climbed in ships - on former adjustments (and there all almost on .) it is expected  from 1 to 30:D.
Other question that  not   in  on KVM, but already it is necessary to write it to other branch. Thanks for consultations smile.