Hello, MTD, you wrote: S>> Here all in essence: http://rsdn.org/forum/cpp.applied/6936956.1 the Author: so5team Date: 18.10 12:17 MTD> And where there the answer? Two questions and two statements. Where the answer? On the second circle, but specially for you, it is possible to go and on it. So, at first to you gave irrefragable answers on your questions. Further you declared that "It not absolutely that is required in ." Accordingly, to you there and then asked questions to learn that it is necessary for you also what at you . If you do not understand, what for these questions have been set, we explain: we did RESTinio proceeding from the reasons about that, as though we used RESTinio in conditions known to us. Therefore we would like to learn about conditions which to us are not known. But you keep all a secret. We pretend that we to you checked. Further you speak:" At first, it is not clear whence such constants ". And we explain to you that such constants are set by the user of library. That, in our opinion, completely explains that fact that they not in code RESTinio. Also that the user can set own values. You are surprised, but happens and so that similar things are sewn up in the code of libraries and is simple so them not to change. Further goes at first" secondly, it all the same does not allow to distinguish the fair user with the modem from the malefactor. ", and then" and it only one of set of potential problems ". And there and then we again ask you to share knowledge which you, ostensibly, possess. But you keep again all a secret. We again pretend that to you checked. Further there is that, for what in real life or simply cease to talk to the person, or friendly return in an objective reality:" Judging by that you do not have sufficient experience in it, it is supposed to be debugged on real users, and these are years and reputation. "On what we in the soft and acceptable form to you told:" Thanks for care, but whether it is possible to come up with the ideas was more constructively? ", what followed perceive as:" Suffices will be measured in the length and let's talk in essence ". So all very much on business and more than adequately. If you think that on the Internet to you owe something with adequacy you search for problems at all there and not at those. S>> here again: http://rsdn.org/forum/cpp.applied/6936991.1 the Author: so5team Date: 18.10 12:38 MTD> the Answer is:" To documentation about it it is written." Formally like answered, and actually sent. Actually there the link to section in which all is described has been given. If you cannot read the documentation... At all so: if you do not wish to read the documentation on library into which arguing got it is not necessary to calculate that generally someone though will perceive you somehow. S>> as well as here: http://rsdn.org/forum/cpp.applied/6937072.1 the author: so5team Date: 18.10 13:10 MTD> And here where answers? One questions and statements. That's it in listing of situations there also there are answers. And if you are not capable to understand, what exactly to you tell, try to ask specifying question. Politely. Probably, we will have time to explain that you do not understand. S>> and any insult you there do not find. MTD> yes, only rudeness, and direct insults too is, but in other posts. I.e. insults about which you so long spoke, you and did not find. MTD> I even will tell - everyone and more and was not present, here , and here already was not present. Well to you is more visible, who you, where and when.