Hello, so5team, you wrote: S> Attempts of constructive dialogue with you were undertaken repeatedly (No1 Author: so5team Date: 18.10 11:51, No2 Author: so5team Date: 18.10 12:17, No3 Author: so5team Date: 18.10 12:38, No4 Author: so5team Date: 18.10 13:17, No5 Author: so5team Date: 18.10 13:10) and not only us (No1 Author: antropolog Date: 18.10 12:42, No2 Author: antropolog Date: 18.10 13:12). Fasten to flood - a word constructive you treat on the. The answer - constructive is pleasant, it is not pleasant - not constructive. S> to do the turbid hints on sacral knowledge ostensibly available for you it is not necessary to say lies, any I did not do hints - at once told that I have not enough experience: Therefore I also speak - it is not necessary there where people for years turn out experience - hurriedly it turns out worse. At first, wanted to write the torn answer, then thought that I too have not enough experience, therefore or employ those people who already all knows, or for years type the cones, to train on cats users, somehow not so correctly. By the way, too it would be better to you not to fill with a fog and it is important to inflate cheeks, and at once to tell that it is not enough experience in network programming, but there is a wide experience in other areas and the strong desire is would be fair and correct. S> and as representing from itself the offended innocence you already told that whether you there it is a lot of, whether persons in a head of one switch it is noticeable, at first there is a cattle and offends the interlocutor, the lamb is then connected and questions, and where insults. S> a) to retain a subject afloat for black PR does not happen; Perfectly, we work further. S> b) visually to illustrate to potential users your thesis that waits for them if they come to us about a bug-reportom. What is is fair, let illusions do not feed contacting your development. I press a hand. S> if you something do not understand, it at all a consequence of that we made something difficult. I did not look at all. That at you for megalomania as if for all only also thirst to rummage that you there produced tormently. MTD>> there is an understanding - you amuse the vanity and dream (already how many years) to win world, to receive calling. To the world as usual . S> If you so understand a situation with development of our command at first, you precisely are not right All right to me you say lies, but it is not necessary to yourself. S> at you any triggered case of youthful maximalism. So same at you, but even not youthful, and children's - who does not praise me, that fool. S> that once again confirms the diagnosis: "the juvenile moron" () Well-well.