Re: The best language on light
Hello, kochetkov.vladimir, you wrote: KV> It is not necessary so, about colleagues One of these "blockheads" after JetBrains was arranged to us and, for ~1.5 years of the operation, no censures to its efficiency arose. From these one and a half years, months ~8 I was it , .. I know, about what I speak. It thus that the project over which it all this time works, in places is more difficult than the compiler or language will be. Yes, Stas the programmer from god. A little bit, only, on requests of users spits (from a series "from me a packet left") and, unfortunately, recently to me at all does not help. If over the project worked would like it we already finished it. KV> It turns out, what quite to itself the adult person kicked three years , and then suddenly became reasonable, yes so, what the second year cannot already release? "I do not trust!" () Yes at them constant idea that they on our place all would make that not so, and it is a hundred times easier and better. It if you will plunge, all complexities of tasks are clear. And always it is easy to argue on another's operation from outside. We it and the country would control is better. And in football would play (despite beer stomachs) is better. KV> Result - in repository Nitra and it definitely differs from zero on some orders. Thanks for support. KV> if speech about Nemerle it (how much I remember) the JetBrains interested only, as means, but not the purpose. The purpose was development by guys which could, on the one hand - to occupy a niche fashionable now Haxe-like , and with another - to give the chance to JetBrains to build around all it an infrastructure on the basis of already available products. They them did not interest at all. They once looked at its demonstration. I showed that all their prejudices concerning macroes are groundless, but interest there not especially arose. comparing with the language decisions was interesting (author Kotlina) only. He to me told about plans to make support of multiple inheritance in Kotline. I doubted simplicity of implementation of this business. He told that make, but and did not make. And we here, with Stasom, made. In Nitra for nuclear heating plant multiple inheritance is supported. Very conveniently it turned out. KV> the reasons on which all happens how happens - set and guys concern far not all from them, IMO. So. Likely we not always gave all the best on 100. But three years to give all the best on 100 % simply is not real on end. And likely we threatened on too big task, underestimating its complexity. But I can prove in details what to make the correct expanded language on another practically not probably. Well, unless with much a command and the MSEC.