1

Topic: Beautiful girls - with children

More shortly, I Solved on a dating site. Correct, orthodox. To get acquainted with the good girl that on it then to marry. And here that turns out, whether that on a photo without coming into a profile I can define there are at it already children. I.e. if nice,  with children. Ordinary-looking - unmarried. Accuracy of 80 %. How you consider it was probablly?

2

Re: Beautiful girls - with children

G> As you consider it was probablly? It depends on your age. If to you 43 years, yes. And if 20-25 is not present.

3

Re: Beautiful girls - with children

I still as am able to define - whether the fool the person. If the person - means the fool. Accuracy of 80 %.

4

Re: Beautiful girls - with children

G> is shorter, G> I Solved on a dating site. Correct, orthodox. To get acquainted with the good girl that on it then to marry. And here that turns out, whether that on a photo without coming into a profile I can define there are at it already children. I.e. if nice,  with children. Ordinary-looking - unmarried. Accuracy of 80 %. G> As you consider it was probablly? And I noted that at eyes giving birth to expression any another. I can not describe, but any another. You look at a photo and at once with the big accuracy you define - gave birth or not.

5

Re: Beautiful girls - with children

G>> As you consider it was probablly? AS> it depends on your age. If to you 43 years, yes. And if 20-25 is not present. In 18 it is a lot of stray women, so though to you 25 though 43 it is great value has no.