26

Re: For 3 $ a supercomputer of 2004

Hello, Ops, you wrote: AVK>> Rasschety were approximate. And then a heap of experiments with steel balls. Ops> so quits, all these computing powers are not too necessary for serious achievements? All depends on complexity of the task. Where that it is possible  to lead couple of years experiments and where that experiments basically are inaccessible. AVK>> not only. On civil rockets too most. Ops> you about space? So he from fighters gemmated.  too from fighters?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0 on Windows 8 6.2.9200.0>>

27

Re: For 3 $ a supercomputer of 2004

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: vsb>>> Same videocards, and on a supercomputer general purpose processors. It is impossible so to compare. If the task on the videocard does not lay down, there is no at you a supercomputer. S>> too most and in , the task too should be decomposed on parallel calculations. vsb> not the same. In videocards one instruction becomes over a heap of the same data. And if at you different instructions in each flow the videocard does not help you. I.e. if you have to count one million hashes for numbers from 0 to one million, you get an array on one million numbers, load the program which considers a hash and apply it to this one million numbers simultaneously. Here the videocard will work perfectly well. And if you for each number have different instructions, if and , here already the videocard loses meaning, since From 10 000 working processors will work 1-2 on slow rate, while a supercomputer in which these 10 000 processors independent and independent from each other, will be processed by all much faster. And  such code to write? He will solve what task?

28

Re: For 3 $ a supercomputer of 2004

Hello, AndrewVK, you wrote: AVK> Falkon too from fighters? And there unless all with 0? The Same technologies from NASA.

29

Re: For 3 $ a supercomputer of 2004

Hello, Ops, you wrote: AVK>> Falkon too from fighters? Ops> and there unless all with 0? The Same technologies from NASA. Electronics precisely from zero. There, at least, it is used industrial grade instead of military.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0 on Windows 8 6.2.9200.0>>

30

Re: For 3 $ a supercomputer of 2004

Hello, AndrewVK, you wrote: AVK> Electronics precisely from zero. There, at least, it is used industrial grade instead of military. About, yes, the same vendor, and acceptance different - means also electronics different.

31

Re: For 3 $ a supercomputer of 2004

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> About, yes, the same vendor, and acceptance different - means also electronics different. There principles of creation of onboard systems others.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0 on Windows 8 6.2.9200.0>>