26

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> And to you not  to write from the computer based on operations of one little-known English gay? Whether a background Neumann too that?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

27

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> https://news.rambler.ru/starlife/382898 … ntent=news here it is interesting To me, and for pedophilia it is necessary to homosexuals less? There and then, possibly, the positive discrimination is necessary. Kastuju Kiberaksa for clarification.

28

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: M>> And you thought, in the USA escapes punishment to let out the Antiamerican serials? Here and censorship works for them, and you trust any ridiculous charges. SO> to CHARGES? He admitted. You under the link itself walked, not? Him accused of pedophilia, and he therefore admitted that the gay.

29

Re: And you, Prot

Their customs.

30

Re: And you, Prot

SergeyOsipov: SO> the Pancake as it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (Ka-Peks was pleasant. But Spejsi and to  caused in me bewilderment. Political expressions in support of the most worthless forces in Russia and so forth

31

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Drobodan Frilich, you wrote: > But Spejsi and to  caused in me bewilderment. > Political expressions in support of the most worthless forces in Russia and so forth I somehow did not track its expressions out of cinema. And this article casually got. Would not see is better.

32

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> would not see Is better. Too it is somehow impressionable you concern, hammer.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

33

Re: And you, Prot

34

Re: And you, Prot

35

Re: And you, Prot

36

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> SO> the Pancake as it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (What fine example enough thinking typical for much people. I can not pick up determinations precisely enough to describe this phenomenon. This thinking dichotomizing - black/white, either I love, or I hate, etc. But at the same time in sphere of perception of many things such porridge is watched... "It was pleasant to you to cinema Ka-Peks", and now "to look ". There is a cinema. It changed? No. So in what put? There is an actor who played in a film, thus many years ago showed any behavior which is opposite to you. The behavior has been shown. And the film was. But you did not know. And the film was norms. Now learned. And a film not norms. But objectively did not change generally anything. And here... It was pleasant-> . It is Enough to see things such as they are, separating them from other things. If you want to watch a good film - watch a good film. If you like a broth - eat a broth, do not think of that that it is a cadaveric extension. .. SergeyOsipov, here tell, you hate Germany? If is not present, why? After all there Hitler was (argument about Germany, is heard by me in a kindergarten from other children when I still itself was the child)

37

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, 3V, you wrote: people who pose from itself objective robots without a drop of emotions and an impurity of the human Surprise. They are simply ridiculous

38

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: That is, you turn out  watching a film.

39

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> That is, you turn out  watching a film. What made? Not so I understand your gopninsko-teenage .

40

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> That made? Not so I understand your gopninsko-teenage . Yes all of you understand, I on the contrary tried to speak in your language.

41

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> Yes all of you understand, I on the contrary tried to speak in your language. On what "yours"? No, I do not understand. Would answer, if would understand. Heard a word "". Thought, approximately I understand about what speech. But here a combination ", watching a film" - it is absolutely not clear about what speech.

42

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, 3V, you wrote: 3V> .. SergeyOsipov, here tell, you hate Germany? If is not present, why? 3V> After all there Hitler was 3V> (the argument about Germany, is heard by me in a kindergarten from other children when 3V> I still itself was the child) I not Osipov, but I will answer. Purely for me fact realization that millions Germans wanted to destroy my nation causes a negative to them, to put it mildly.

43

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> On what "yours"? No, I do not understand. Would answer, if would understand. SO> heard a word "". Thought, approximately I understand about what speech. But here a combination ", watching a film" - it is absolutely not clear about what speech. The pancake all your post also is about it is "I  watching a film" - well if you absolutely in vacuum grew, and have no general outlook I will chew - on criminal  it means that you broke a certain taboo - for example such taboo can be to drink from one mug with the passive homosexual. Or for example to watch with its film and it also it was pleasant. By the way ignorance that somebody was the gay person does not release from . Here so that.

44

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> on criminal  it means that you broke a certain taboo That is, telling "I on the contrary tried to speak in your language", you showed, what consider me as the criminal? Funny. The criminal me still nobody named Is characteristic that you know criminal , and I was not present

45

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> That is, you turn out  watching a film. Yes,  the full quitted. Well though  with Spejsi it was not photographed on what-thread film presentation. Then there would be all. The end.

46

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> Yes all of you understand, I on the contrary tried to speak in your language. More similar that you "", and the HARDWARE simply unduly connects actors with their screen images.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

47

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> SO> the Pancake as it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (SO> https://news.rambler.ru/starlife/382898 … ntent=news SO> Farewell, Prot As you are vile, believers. To pray to a being which according to your mythology carried out a genocide of all civilization, it is not opposite to you. It is not a pity that I can tell to you "farewell"... You everywhere on a planet.

48

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> on criminal  it means that you broke a certain taboo In criminal  (with which sign only from it is thin. The literature) such word did not meet, and here in modern  it is very often used by everyone . Value approximately as the word synonym was dishonored. Though everywhere write that , initially criminal word.

49

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> It is characteristic that you know criminal , and I was not present Anything amusing, esteem Daniel Koretsky - the same you will familiarize. Is very interesting writes.

50

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> As you are vile, believers. And you ridiculous thought Earlier that you are simple . And there is you also ridiculous  Sluuuush!!! I understood!!! Me only reached! <... It is cut...> much explains This <... It is cut...> the Insult is cut. Reversal to moderators is cut.