51

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Qt-Coder, you wrote: QC> I not Osipov, but will answer. Purely for me fact realization that millions Germans wanted to destroy my nation causes a negative to them, to put it mildly. And now these Germans already practically does not remain. And German schoolboys drag at excursion in Osventsim without fail. I.e. they repent till now of any sense, though those who repent and did not do anything. To that I wrote about Germany generally as to the country. And about a phenomenon (there can be this any spread  distortion) owing to which perception of one things is spread to others, not concerning or feeblly concerning to the first.

52

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, pagid, you wrote: I looked  with Spejsi (7, 21, ka-peks) and the first response was, what yes .

53

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> It is characteristic that you know criminal , and I was not present I did not sit if , but words I know, in Russia it somehow this knowledge appears. Especially if dews in 90.

54

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, 3V, you wrote: QC>> I not Osipov, but will answer. Purely for me fact realization that millions Germans wanted to destroy my nation causes a negative to them, to put it mildly. 3V> and now these Germans already practically does not remain. And it is not important. Those Germans who in 1242 sank in Chudsky lake too for a long time does not remain. And that which in 1914 attacked personally Russia. 3V> and German schoolboys drag at excursion in Osventsim without fail. Yes? And they there do what outputs? "Captured not to take"? 3V> I.e. they in any sense Study till now.

55

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> Yes. SO> Once "Without the Person" it was pleasant to cinema. BUT as Travolta told all about the "" - I can not look, how it represents from itself(himself) loving family man. What, and Travolta too?

56

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> And you ridiculous SO> thought Earlier that you are simple . And there is you also ridiculous  SO> Sluuuush!!! I understood!!! Me only reached! Yes you ???? Much explains this (to Moderators, it not the insult, and the assumption of orientation) Explains disgust for people which worship to a being, according to your mythology some times applying weapons of mass destruction to a human civilization?

57

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: QC>> on criminal  it means that you broke a certain taboo in general, it is not so important as as is called in other language, it is important as you concern it. SO> it is characteristic that you know criminal , and I was not present It as a foreign language. Not mandatory to use, but it is better to know not to get to comical situations.

58

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Explains disgust for people which worship to a being, according to your mythology some times applying weapons of mass destruction to a human civilization? No, explains desire to "cure" all mankind. If over me in the childhood would scoff, if I would weigh the teenage period would suffer on the boy from an adjacent entrance, understanding that it is meek. If me hooligans for that are a head about garage that hardly tinted lips - I too would would like to cure all mankind and to correct all gene, and then  would protect the morons showing a member to barmen. Keep there!!!

59

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> By the way: And than to explain your bent for , , to constraint public to consider your person? Whether that most? I cause to consider my person???? Yes you that!!! It would be very glad, that all forgot about me and considered only subjects which I write. So is not present after all - all always on me come off. It is not necessary!!!! Asked hundred times already!!!

60

Re: And you, Prot

SO> Sluuuush!!! I understood!!! Me only reached! Yes you ???? Much explains this (to Moderators, it not the insult, and the assumption of orientation) Whence in you is so much aggression? You precisely believing?

61

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SK>> By the way: And than to explain your bent for , , to constraint public to consider your person? Whether that most? SO> I cause to consider my person???? Yes you that!!! It would be very glad, that all forgot about me and considered only subjects which I write. So is not present after all - all always on me come off. It is not necessary!!!! Asked hundred times already!!! So you the comments in a subject force to change the subject.

62

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> So you the comments in a subject force to change the subject. Funny I wrote that began  to look certain films To me in the answer - what you, believers, vile And then  that I change a subject and I - malicious and aggressive. ....

63

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> Is not present, explains desire to "cure" all mankind. For me too much explains it... What master, such and slaves. All your so-called philanthrophy bursts as a soap bubble if to ponder upon an essence of your comment. It appears, the hooligans beating the innocent person by a head about garage - it is in the order of things and to treatment is not subject... And if the boy tinted lips - that it is nasty thing-nasty thing and is subject to the forced treatment (and according to some mythological dogmas also to punishment) Here in it and the dreadful fascist essence of your "is traditional-valuable" system consists.

64

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: do not overwind. I did not tell that it is norm. I only described a standard situation which would be with the nonconventional boy at the time of a decline of the USSR. And by the way, you even did not tell that I am not right in the assumption

65

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote:  you incurred

66

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> do not overwind. I did not tell that it is norm. I only described a standard situation which would be with the nonconventional boy at the time of a decline of the USSR. SO> and by the way, you even did not tell that I am not right in the assumption Strange that showing such savoir vivre at the time of a decline of the USSR, you do not know that such "". Something here is not joined. Whether hour the autobiography described?

67

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SK>> So you the comments in a subject force to change the subject. SO> I am amusing SO> wrote that began  to look certain films SO> To me in the answer - what you, believers, vile And you in the answer: "and you generally . " SO> And then  that I change a subject and I - malicious and aggressive. Yes, you malicious and aggressive

68

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> it is strange that showing such savoir vivre at the time of a decline of the USSR, you do not know that such "". Something here is not joined. Whether hour the autobiography described? I do not know, how was. Assumed. And generally, most likely, softly assumed. I think, all was more rigid. And about "" - generally this word was not at the time of my childhood. I for the first time recently somewhere heard it.

69

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Marty, you wrote: M> And you in the answer: "and you generally . " I asked! Assumed! Its answer "is not present, not " would be more than enough. BUT he for some reason so does not answer. M> yes, you malicious and aggressive I emotional. On-default is not present, not malicious and not the aggressive.

70

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, s_aa, you wrote: _> Mind you understand that is not connected, but to concern on former the actor cannot any more. The character of a successful role you perceive as the good acquaintance. And here such regional ohm! Correctly to perceive the actor, as a good dial-up .

71

Re: And you, Prot

M> That, and Travolta too?

72

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Denwer, you wrote: SO>> Farewell, Prot D> And how our films with Evgenie Mironov's involvement look? In any way, I know only Mironov who in 12 chairs played Bendera, but it already died.

73

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K>  it is finite

74

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> I do not connect the computer and the person, its invented. SO> and here the role and the actor - is difficult for dividing, when every second during review you see it. Ridiculously. In the computer the author put the soul. And that the actor - read another's text under the direction of the director, dressed clothes under the direction of the costumier - a dial-up  and only.

75

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> Yes? And they there do what outputs? "Captured not to take"? Why you so think? And, yes. That is not the question. And in that that you turn out spread a certain image of the fascist to schoolboys who to it are not privy. In it the phenomenon also consists. Probably it is any form of a phobia. 3V>> I.e. they in any sense SK> Study till now. In that study?