1

Topic: And you, Prot

The pancake as it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (https://news.rambler.ru/starlife/38289832-kevina-speysi-obvinili-v-pedofilii/?utm_source=head&utm_campaign=self_promo&utm_medium=news&utm_content=news Farewell, Prot

2

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> the Pancake how it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (And you thought, in the USA escapes punishment to let out the Antiamerican serials? Here and censorship works for them, and you trust any ridiculous charges.

3

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> And you thought, in the USA escapes punishment to let out the Antiamerican serials? Here and censorship works for them, and you trust any ridiculous charges. To CHARGES? He admitted.

4

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: he/she is that uncle what named itself the Ukrainian? A pancake,   I can not find this ridiculous subject

5

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> the Pancake how it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (As is connected quality of a film and sexual orientation of actors?

6

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> As quality of a film and sexual orientation of actors is connected? And I wrote, what the film sharply became bad? No, I wrote "to look  became".

7

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: M>> And you thought, in the USA escapes punishment to let out the Antiamerican serials? Here and censorship works for them, and you trust any ridiculous charges. SO> to CHARGES? He admitted. About 1986? 2 drunks got drunk in , and now something invent. Certainly, in Hollywood it is a lot of dirt.

8

Re: And you, Prot

0> As quality of a film and sexual orientation of actors is connected? Mind you understand that is not connected, but to concern on former the actor cannot any more. The character of a successful role you perceive as the good acquaintance. And here such regional ohm!

9

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> SO> the Pancake how it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (SO> https://news.rambler.ru/starlife/382898 … ntent=news SO> Farewell, Prot And how our films with Evgenie Mironov's involvement look?

10

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> And I wrote, what the film sharply became bad? SO> is not present, I wrote "to look  became". In a serial the Theory of the big explosion actor Sheldona Cooper like as the gay, but yet does not advertize, as though and . And here  propagation in fresh serials, type Star Trek: Discovery, or The Orville - really irritates

11

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Denwer, you wrote: D> And how our films with Evgenie Mironov's involvement look? And IT??????

12

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, s_aa, you wrote: _> Mind you understand that is not connected, but to concern on former the actor cannot any more. The character of a successful role you perceive as the good acquaintance. And here such regional ohm! So character, instead of the actor Some actors, for example, in life - rare *. So, now and with them films not to look?

13

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> And I wrote, what the film sharply became bad? SO> is not present, I wrote "to look  became". That is the film good and to look ?

14

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> Some actors, for example, in life - rare *. So, now and with them films not to look? "" - concept subjective. And here about what speech, very much even the objective.

15

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> the Pancake how it was pleasant to cinema Ka-Peks, and now to look  (And not  to write to you from the computer based on operations of one little-known English gay? SO> farewell, Prot... Told SergeyOsipov, throwing out in a window stuffed  ideas the system unit. P.S. And Kapeks  .  it will be better.

16

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: 0> That is a film good and to look ? Yes. Once "without the Person" it was pleasant to cinema. BUT as Travolta told all about the "" - I can not look, how it represents from itself(himself) loving family man.

17

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M>>> And you thought, in the USA escapes punishment to let out the Antiamerican serials? Here and censorship works for them, and you trust any ridiculous charges. SO>> to CHARGES? He admitted. M> about 1986? 2 drunks got drunk in , and now something invent. Certainly, in Hollywood it is a lot of dirt. Probably he invented a recognition to hush up charges in harassment to the minor. Too for a recognition he selected any opportunity.

18

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> And to you not  to write from the computer based on operations of one little-known English gay? I do not connect the computer and the person, its invented. And here the role and the actor - is difficult for dividing, when every second during review you see it.

19

Re: And you, Prot

0> Some actors, for example, in life - rare *. So, now and with them films not to look? It too most. If you learn about the actor something bad, and to films with its involvement the relation another. For example Humpbacks as the actor was pleasant to me, from "Countess Monsoro". But after its tricks with  to look films with its involvement it would not be desirable.

20

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: And films from Depardieu it is not opposite to you to look?

21

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Stanislaw K, you wrote: SK> And films from Depardieu it is not opposite to you to look? Yes I also do not remember when watched a film with it. At all I do not remember films with it which would be pleasant or were not pleasant. Generally on a drum both on it and on films with it. Instead of, recalled, Rasputina with it looked - it was not pleasant neither a film, nor a role.

22

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, SergeyOsipov, you wrote: SO> Once "Without the Person" it was pleasant to cinema. BUT as Travolta told all about the "" - I can not look, how it represents from itself(himself) loving family man. At all I do not know, as to tell. To me always was so  on the person of actors that your response sincerely amazes me.

23

Re: And you, Prot

SO> Yes. SO> Once "Without the Person" it was pleasant to cinema. BUT as Travolta told all about the "" - I can not look, how it represents from itself(himself) loving family man. Do not drive on . It , and at them  - as in your language a sin

24

Re: And you, Prot

SO> Farewell, Prot Wanted to write - farewell, Opposite?

25

Re: And you, Prot

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: K> the recognition is possible it invented to hush up charges in harassment to the minor. What means "invented"? And whether actually it "such" that? K> Too for a recognition he selected any opportunity. So he also did not select it, it is obvious that the recognition is connected to charge. And it does not deny charge.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>