1

Topic: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Me 2 moments  here: a canceling of output of helps vs insurance and deleting of point about a video shooting.

2

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Diman, you wrote: D> Me 2 moments  here: a canceling of output of helps vs insurance and deleting of point about a video shooting. Helps explicitly are not mandatory. The euro-protocol is filled, the police subscribes. At  the insurance addresses to policemen signed the protocol. At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. In Italian insurance after my request simply called in police.

3

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: a C> At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. In Italian insurance after my request simply called in police. Here a current that road accident was, OSAGOVSKY design from me at all did not demand, I at all did not do it. But help about road accident was still necessary. Where now they will fix all data - not clearly.

4

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Diman, you wrote: D> Me 2 moments  here: a canceling of output of helps vs insurance and deleting of point about a video shooting. With a video shooting changed nothing, at them the point which is not recommending to police officers to hinder to shooting left. It means nothing, does not mean that it is possible to hinder, does not mean that it is necessary to hinder, does not mean that you cannot remove, does not mean that you should remove. Changed nothing.

5

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, MasterZiv, you wrote: MZ> to hinder with shooting. It means nothing, does not mean that it is possible to hinder, does not mean that it is necessary MZ> to hinder, does not mean that you cannot remove, does not mean that you should remove. In the same place it is told that can to ask to stop shooting. MZ> changed nothing. About, still as changed.

6

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Kernan, you wrote: K> In the same place it is told that can to ask to stop shooting. Can. You stop to remove his face - and all at once it becomes possible. K> About, still as changed. , the tin is a resolution of control of speed in venues of a roadwork. No, I do not argue, if operations are really led. And if simply there are forgotten signs and operations all are fulfilled? Here, where a feeding trough simply bottomless!

7

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

D> Me 2 moments  here: a canceling of output of helps vs insurance and deleting of point about a video shooting. And as about points: - to hide behind natural objects along roads - possibility to stop out of a post and needlessly to confirm the stop requirement (type simply for check of documents)

8

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, namespace, you wrote: N> And as about points:> - to hide behind natural objects along roads N> - possibility to stop out of a post and needlessly to confirm the stop requirement (type simply for check of documents) And it somewhere disappeared? Always checked. Especially on days off - in documents to glance, a nose to pull, and suddenly the patient well spent evening the day before. Here on a post never stopped.

9

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, MasterZiv, you wrote: MZ> Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: a C>> At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. In Italian insurance after my request simply called in police. MZ> here a current that road accident was, OSAGOVSKY design from me at all did not demand, I at all did not do it. MZ> but help about road accident was still necessary. MZ> where now they will fix all data - not clearly. That's it, the Central Bank that demands

10

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

LN> Can. You stop to remove his face - and all at once it becomes possible. Here also we look as courts I will accept such videos.

11

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: a C> At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. In Italian insurance after my request simply called in police. You did not fill the form in Italian?

12

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, V. Zudin, you wrote: SVZ> And it somewhere disappeared? Always checked. SVZ> especially on days off - in documents to glance, a nose to pull, and suddenly the patient well spent evening the day before. SVZ> Here on a post never stopped. At us here and posts all closed for a long time already.

13

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, SabaiSabai, you wrote: a C>> At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. In Italian insurance after my request simply called in police. SS> you did not fill the form in Italian? No, all were filled with policemen. It was necessary tinkers with the insurance. Wrote to them in English, added transfer of the Google-compiler into Italian.

14

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Cornetov, you wrote: a C> At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. And police about an hour to reach transport or longer?

15

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, Kernan, you wrote: K> In the same place it is told that can to ask to stop shooting. https://www.zr.ru/content/articles/9089 … reglament/ many, familiarized with the rules, drew an erratic output that now it is impossible to remove operation of the inspector of traffic police on video. It not so. Yes, in the rules eliminated position on which the inspector had no right to hinder with video record guiding. But thus in the document it is specified that it is accepted according to the current legislation. And time so to forbid us to conduct shooting it is possible in strongly restricted cases (antiterrorist actions, regime objects).

16

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, mrTwister, you wrote: T> https://www.zr.ru/content/articles/9089 … reglament/ T> Many, familiarized with the rules, drew an erratic output that now it is impossible to remove operation of the inspector of traffic police on video. It not so. Yes, in the rules eliminated position on which the inspector had no right to hinder with video record guiding. But thus in the document it is specified that it is accepted according to the current legislation. And time so to forbid us to conduct shooting it is possible in strongly restricted cases (antiterrorist actions, regime objects). The Same words and on a traffic police site are, But now at  there was a possibility to forbid shooting with the current legislation.

17

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, siberia2, you wrote: a C>> At road accident in Italy all and was (1.5 year ago). On a place the police filled all. Minutes 15 all also released. S> and police about an hour to reach transport or longer? All on a place.

18

Re: And what nobody considers the new rules?

Hello, LuciferNovoros, you wrote: LN> , the tin is a resolution of control of speed in venues of a roadwork. No, I do not argue, if operations are really led. And if simply there are forgotten signs and operations all are fulfilled? Here, where a feeding trough simply bottomless! Yes, it is a fuck-up. There went in region center - road , but everywhere signs "40" in the summer! You go on a fresh route, suddenly begin temporal 70, 50, 40. The road, a pancake, month as is made already! What, seriously to drop to forty? Instead of you will drop - you go with double excess, it turns out, and you are afraid.