1

Topic: [Interview].NET Security it is simple

In  capital DotNext 2017, I and Michael Yuske Scherbaks of a distance small interview to its organizers on platform safety issues.NET and applications developed under it. https://habrahabr.ru/company/jugru/blog/341792/... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.16 alpha 5 rev. 60>>

2

Re: [Interview].NET Security it is simple

It is possible about Kestrel and why it is not ready more in detail in the form of the Russian text on RSDN? (I understand that I ask not that lecturer)

3

Re: [Interview].NET Security it is simple

Hello, Arsen. Shnurkov, you wrote: AS> it is possible about Kestrel and why it is not ready more in detail in the form of the Russian text on RSDN? (I understand that I ask not that lecturer) I Think it  noise in favor of Windows Server - without Dynamic IP Restrictions in IIS 7.5/10 it easily to suppose ddos th for copecks But kestrel is public nobody forces to expose without what a reverse-proxy thread Here for example on days off your obedient servant  http://touch-galleries.appspot.com there ASP.NET Core 2.0 under  in any  hidden in docker for nginx. What there not so with ?

4

Re: [Interview].NET Security it is simple

Hello, VladCore, you wrote: VC> I Think it  noise in favor of Windows Server - without Dynamic IP Restrictions in IIS 7.5/10 it easily to suppose ddos th for copecks Dynamic IP Restrictions the piece stupid enough and primitive so to implement it at stack level asp.net  not from area of the impossible. Well and DDoS it does not rescue from modern,  normal you it will not cut, only , attacking from 1-2 machines.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0 on Windows 8 6.2.9200.0>>

5

Re: [Interview].NET Security it is simple

Hello, AndrewVK, you wrote: AVK> Dynamic IP Restrictions a piece stupid enough and primitive, Anybody also did not write that a difficult piece. AVK> so to implement it at stack level asp.net  not from area of the impossible. Cards in hands - compare implementation in IIS and in "a stack asp.net"