1

Topic: WhatsApp for Windows

Parallel client WhatsApp, that not  wanted to have under Windows the text on the poor telephone keypad, when nearby the normal.  any time a web client (web.whatsapp.com), decided to deliver . At first  from the size (70 MB the packed fitter). Launching it,  it is even more - it unpacked in APPDATA already 230 meters then launched 55-meter EXE in four (!) copies. Certainly, has been taken immediately down - to hold so inhuman  in working system frankly uncomfortably. I supposed earlier that it  is huge and is idiotically made, but in a fitter 7.33 only 55 meters, and it is torn in 83. In Telegram - 38 meters, but it not a fitter, and worker EXE who inside is not packed (7-Zip presses it to 19). Is though any reasonable explanation to so inhuman size and behavior WhatsApp? Interesting, for such though it is a shame to them a little?

2

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> Is though any reasonable explanation to so inhuman size and behavior WhatsApp? Interesting, for such though it is a shame to them a little? On mobile phones also.  concerning small bright, VatsAp - slow and enormous, as Skajp - generally the monster also works. Explanations to it simple - to learn programming it is not necessary, if is .  them from tens in the project also you rejoice. And that the fattened hog - excites nobody that the project thus expanded. What for to worry about such trifles, when around "" on modern devices? It is necessary to occupy somehow kernels and storage of new devices.

3

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

Hello, Nikolay_Ch, you wrote: N_C> On mobile phones also. Under  it with all giblets is laid down in 64 meters. It, of course, too to a fig, but on  to measures - is a little. How they achieved volume quadrupling on PC? N_C> And that the project thus expanded All right if only would expand. In a parallel at them that do Four copies EXE?

4

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

Hello, Evgenie Muzychenko, you wrote: I eat> All right if only would expand. In a parallel at them that do Four copies EXE? It most likely Chromium (open-source Chrome) in which is loaded that Web the client. To look here https://electronjs.org/

5

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

I eat> At first  from the size (70 MB the packed installer). Launching it,  it is even more - it unpacked in APPDATA already 230 meters then launched 55-meter EXE in four (!) copies. Certainly, has been taken immediately down - to hold so inhuman  in working system frankly uncomfortably. Welcome to the wonderful world  web applications. It you probably even  in storage did not look the size of it Desktopnye of the version of popular applications - Slack, Viber,  - too from the same opera. Though. 32 the RAM suffices all!

6

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

Hello, std.denis, you wrote: SD> you probably even  in storage did not look the size of it Looked. Each copy guzzles on 50-70 meters. Separate copy Firefox in which I open a web client, guzzles nearby 170 so saving is available.

7

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

I eat> Looked. Each copy guzzles on 50-70 meters. Separate copy Firefox in which I open a web client, guzzles nearby 170 so saving is available. And what for a separate copy? Simply separate window is possible after all

8

Re: WhatsApp for Windows

Hello, std.denis, you wrote: SD> And what for a separate copy? Simply separate window the Window in the same process, and it and so guzzles as not in itself - at three-four tens tabs it is inflated almost to three  will be possible after all.