1

Topic: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

The person whom for not such time wide interval  whole  pages of texts, in me causes suspicion. Whether probably such and how much it is qualitative if it  is possible? And that can is not present any , and there is a shop of hack writers or that is even worse, computer bots which daily, not  that there at them are,   a content on the given parameters on  to broad masses of uneducated cattle of readers

2

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

It is not necessary

3

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, system.console, you wrote: SC> the Person whom for not such time wide interval  whole  pages of texts, causes suspicion in me. Whether SC> probably such and how much it is qualitative if it  is possible? Look at Yury Nikitin - and it also under Guy Juliem Orlovsky  at ton of books. After that Livadnyj not such and  though it certainly is younger, and at it still all ahead

4

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, Arsen. Shnurkov, you wrote: AS> it is not necessary argue

5

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, system.console, you wrote: AS>> it is not necessary SC> argue And who for it and what for? That achieved?

6

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, SabaiSabai, you wrote: SS> Hello, system.console, you wrote: AS>>> it is not necessary SC>> argue SS> And who for it and what for? That achieved? Did not understand, about whom you?

7

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Subject

8

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, system.console, you wrote: SC> And that can is not present any , and there is a shop of hack writers or that is even worse, computer bots which daily, not  that there at them are,   the content on the given parameters on  to broad masses of uneducated cattle of readers If is bots it is progress.

9

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, guycaesar, you wrote: G> Hello, system.console, you wrote: SC>> And that can is not present any , and there is a shop of hack writers or that is even worse, computer bots which daily, not  that there at them are,   the content on the given parameters on  to broad masses of uneducated cattle of readers G> If is bots it is progress. Unconditionally, but a question not in that

10

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, system.console, you wrote: SC> the Person whom for not such time wide interval  whole  pages of texts, causes suspicion in me. Whether SC> probably such and how much it is qualitative if it  is possible? SC> and that can is not present any , and there is a shop of hack writers or that is even worse, computer bots which daily, not  that there at them are,   the content on the given parameters on  Costs to broad masses of uneducated cattle of readers. Stories are well enough written. The logic is present.  it or one person - as that . I, , any time thought that Oldi is one person - so me persons of authors interest.

11

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, system.console, you wrote: Only it appeared on an unknown planet,  Ivan Tamantsev understood that its successful runaway from a captivity appeared someone is set up. Mysterious changes in own organism caused horror in the fearless soldier. But for it it was only the beginning of an epopee ... And the true story of a planet with a significant title Fate totaled already some millions years. Here   created the biological weapon for struggle against the reasonable insects migrating under the impact of Forerunners on all Universe. And when for one thousand years before failure of a fighter of Ivan Tamantseva colonists from the Earth here landed, they underwent at once to a mutation. Now the similar fate threatened already to all inhabitants of the Universe ... with Sran ! Here it  and a burning loss in the description! Even if this reading matter and interesting one description beats off any desire to read. As the content is already retold also imagination drew a pattern not worse the authoring.

12

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

Hello, system.console, you wrote: SC> the Person whom for not such time wide interval  whole  pages of texts, causes suspicion in me. Whether SC> probably such and how much it is qualitative if it  is possible? SC> and that can is not present any , and there is a shop of hack writers or that is even worse, computer bots which daily, not  that there at them are,   the content on the given parameters on  Read to broad masses of uneducated cattle of readers Livadnogo in the end of 90-s', the beginning of 2000. Was delighted. Read it to all  a room. I.e. early products very much even were interesting. As now - I do not know.

13

Re: : whether it is necessary to waste time?

N> N> Only it appeared on an unknown planet,  Ivan Tamantsev understood that its successful runaway from a captivity appeared someone is set up. Mysterious changes in own organism caused horror in the fearless soldier. But for it it was only the beginning of an epopee ... And the true story of a planet with a significant title Fate totaled already some millions years. Here   created the biological weapon for struggle against the reasonable insects migrating under the impact of Forerunners on all Universe. And when for one thousand years before failure of a fighter of Ivan Tamantseva colonists from the Earth here landed, they underwent at once to a mutation. Now the similar fate threatened already to all inhabitants of the Universe ... N> with Sran ! Here it  and a burning loss in the description! Yes, under the description explicit , but I was intrigued with a principle of selection of words. Why these? The impact of Forerunners, in my opinion, too is worthy.