1

Topic: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Throughout a subject: http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6949718.flat the Author: cheerysoft.com Date: 30.10 19:25 Here earlier took in scales. A bomb on 100 megatons, planes, tanks, rockets... All it is terribly expensive both in manufacture and in service. And after all it is possible to arrive more cleverly. It is possible to create a small virus against which there is no medicine at the opponent. By the do urgent vaccination for . The account, and the enemy will be almost completely liquidated (it is possible to sell type to the enemy a vaccine, but type delayed, then to apologize, if is before whom). Well, and among the there will be losses, after all not all agree on a graft. Well so losses in any war. In an ideal, of course, that you had an immunity and at the opponent is not present. But it is improbable. To me it is not clear why so thoughtlessly concerned a subject? To mine it is an ideal - future world wars if will be, with  the epidemiological weapon. And not as earlier when natural viruses, and already with engaging of the genius of scientific thought and all advanced researches in the field of gene engineering were used. Well and where you then thrust to yourselves the tanks?

2

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

S> To me it is not clear why so thoughtlessly concerned a subject? And what you are is specific suggest to do? The line on gene engineering is registered in the budget. What?

3

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Well and where you then thrust to yourselves the tanks?  is more effective than viruses. Instead of a heap of infectious corpses the opponent receives ready workers who both a toilet wash also the grandfather massage.

4

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: you Think such wars are not conducted yet? Well-well.

5

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

6

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> we Admit China sprayed a virus in London: BOB> 1. 6 quickly clarifies that behind attack there is China... With it in the modern world the big problems. Well here it is admissible all know that that Boeing forced down . And ? All the same sanctions against Russia. And here a virus. How you suggest to prove, what it American?

7

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> And ? All the same sanctions against Russia. If there were proofs that the Boeing was forced down by Russian, you would be spread already... And generally sanctions they for Crimea. Whether  you know that? A> And here a virus. How you suggest to prove, what it American? All is stolen to us... The FBI used genetic analyses to trace the mailed spores back to a flask called RMR-1029, which Ivins could access in his laboratory at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090225/ … 9.120.html If the virus in 2001 appeared Russian, to you not . But it stole in the American laboratory. Or you from those who would consider that special services it for this purpose that   and  on  to drag?

8

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Throughout a subject: http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6949718.flat the Author: cheerysoft.com Date: 30.10 19:25 S> Here earlier took in scales. A bomb on 100 megatons, planes, tanks, rockets... All it is terribly expensive both in manufacture and in service. S> and after all it is possible to arrive more cleverly. It is possible to create a small virus against which there is no medicine at the opponent. By the do urgent vaccination for . The account, and the enemy will be almost completely liquidated (it is possible to sell type to the enemy a vaccine, but type delayed, then to apologize, if is before whom). Well, and among the there will be losses, after all not all agree on a graft. Well so losses in any war. Will not be. The chemical and bacteriological weapon refused in view of their small efficiency.

9

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> To me it is not clear why so thoughtlessly concerned a subject? To mine it is an ideal - future world wars if will be, with  the epidemiological weapon. And what economic sense to destroy future  your goods?

10

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> With it in the modern world the big problems. A> well here it is admissible all know that that Boeing forced down . A> And ? All the same sanctions against Russia. A> and here a virus. How you suggest to prove, what it American? If attack real, instead of information, anything it is not necessary to prove.

11

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Well and where you then thrust to yourselves the tanks? You  in ... http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6955099.1 the Author: BOBKA_XPEH Date: 05.11 13:32 the boiler !

12

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: A>> And here a virus. How you suggest to prove, what it American? Ops> if attack real, instead of information, anything it is not necessary to prove. The previous orator shouted said that all countries of the world in a uniform burst trample an aggressor. Here I doubt that Great Britain will shoot towards the USA if the USA launch such virus.

13

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> the Previous orator shouted said that all countries of the world in a uniform burst trample an aggressor. A> here I doubt that Great Britain will shoot towards the USA if the USA launch such virus. And what to them remains? To be covered with a bed-sheet? Not the fact that many support them, but at them the choice will not be.

14

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> we Admit China sprayed a virus in London: BOB> 1. 6 quickly clarifies that behind attack there is China. BOB> 2. In London the quarantine is declared, all not infected territories is strictly supervised, on boundaries of zones of control laboratories taking analyses of virus strains and antibodies at died and infected work. BOB> 3. Infection does not transit further a central zone of London, lives of millions people are rescued from inevitable death thanks to timely quarantine actions. But some millions persons are already dead or die. I understand that at you terminal "My God, store the Queen!", but you so are assured of efficiency of English services?

15

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > I understand that at you terminal "My God, store the Queen!", but you so are assured of efficiency of English services? Probably I have on that any bases... For example a month before act of terrorism on bridges on bridges there were armed patrols near to bridges. For this reason the amount of victims was not such big.

16

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> Probably I have on that any bases... Probably BOB> For example a month before act of terrorism on bridges on bridges there were armed patrols near to bridges. For this reason the amount of victims was not such big. It would be logical to expect absence of act of terrorism

17

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > it would be logical to expect absence of act of terrorism of Eshe it would be more logical to consider that the bacteriological weapon not to suit for country destruction... But only for carrying out of piece acts of terrorism... But after all there are "experts"... http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6955042.1 the Author: BOBKA_XPEH Date: 05.11 09:11

18

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Desmodus, you wrote: D> you Think such wars are not conducted yet? Well-well. Still technologies are not so developed. Simply biological yes, and here difficult genetic - is not present.

19

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Memy is more effective than viruses. Instead of a heap of infectious corpses the opponent receives ready workers who both a toilet wash also the grandfather massage. Doubtfully.

20

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: S>> Here earlier took in scales. A bomb on 100 megatons, planes, tanks, rockets... All it is terribly expensive both in manufacture and in service. BOB> well, and what you will offer that? To begin with to realize that a problem takes place to be. BOB> oh began... And will cost how many manufacture of such virus? And what if at the opponent of such viruses as shoe polish at ? To Cost much, but constructions and contents  are hardly more expensive. BOB> Can esteem at first to you Wikipedia do not confuse biological when viruses take what is in the nature. If you write the code of a virus from zero - you can to install also the timer (for example that started to operate in 1 year) and the other expanded parameters to set. BOB> my friend , the virus does not kill at once, that enemy (if it not Albania or forgive the Allah Ukraine what ) can launch all that they have in that who them kills. And to infect with a virus of all in territory of one country simultaneously it is actually impossible. It is possible. Simply to set the timer. At first any signs of illness will not be and then already late. BOB> 1. 6 quickly clarifies that behind attack there is China. Not the fact. BOB> 2. In London the quarantine is declared, all not infected territories is strictly supervised, on boundaries of zones of control laboratories taking analyses of virus strains and antibodies at died and infected work. You confuse to the biological weapon. If the virus has been created artificially it is possible to set the timer. While rush - all will be infected.

21

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, the Miner, you wrote: will not be. The chemical and bacteriological weapon refused in view of their small efficiency. This old generation was not effective. New generation when a virus write taking into account parameters - absolutely another.

22

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> To begin with to realize that the problem takes place to be. Well, realized, further that that? S> to Cost much, but constructions and contents  are hardly more expensive. And the bacteriological weapon it not ? S>... If you write the code of a virus from zero - you can to install also the timer (for example that started to operate in 1 year) and the other expanded parameters to set. You at school shirked biology? Can return and to finish learning? Yes not delirium any... S> It is possible. Simply to set the timer. At first any signs of illness will not be and then already late. Biology? Yes is not present,  ... S> you confuse to the biological weapon. (Loudly I knock a healthy ladle on a pan) Viruses are a bacteriological weapon! That you on the fan outline biological this that! S> if the virus has been created artificially it is possible to set the timer. While rush - all will be infected. A virus computer named so simply... It not subspecies of bacteria which on  are written. . The Bug it not  and it on aaplets does not spring... (I Knock a breakage on ) you except  have any, even let rudimentary knowledge? Well there at lessons the person and the nature was though time? It is simply children's babble. Be engaged own in formation, with such intelligence only on  (a Turkic word) to spring... Well it is real, do not take offense. You that do not note that at you the logician at level 5 a class of the Ukrainian school where teach  and ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh5tGUOcYeI

23

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> Here I doubt that Great Britain will shoot towards the USA if the USA launch such virus. Here if launch then we talk... Though most likely they launch where  to China, Russia, Japan, Germany... On  which devils where are, there live 4 cripples... But nevertheless when Argentineans declared the rights on , third of Air Forces of Argentina went to visit the Allah... Remaining sharply fell in love with the native earth and what islands for nothing are not necessary to them... If suddenly Englishmen want to finish the USA at them there will be many assistants. Including Chineses, Russian, Japanese, also forgive the Allah Germen... The Main thing that there were ferro-concrete proofs that this handwork of Americans...

24

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, BOBKA_XPEH, you wrote: BOB> If suddenly Englishmen want to finish the USA at them there will be many assistants. Including Chineses, Russian, Japanese, also forgive the Allah Germen... The Main thing that there were ferro-concrete proofs that this handwork of Americans... The Main thing - that would arise desire. Then and   suffices.

25

Re: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> This old generation was not effective. New generation when a virus write taking into account parameters - absolutely another. The friend, be not dishonored. Viruses written on  kill only  on ... Or in ...