Topic: Whether is perspective to be at war by creation of viruses?
Throughout a subject: http://rsdn.org/forum/flame.politics/6949718.flat the Author: cheerysoft.com Date: 30.10 19:25 Here earlier took in scales. A bomb on 100 megatons, planes, tanks, rockets... All it is terribly expensive both in manufacture and in service. And after all it is possible to arrive more cleverly. It is possible to create a small virus against which there is no medicine at the opponent. By the do urgent vaccination for . The account, and the enemy will be almost completely liquidated (it is possible to sell type to the enemy a vaccine, but type delayed, then to apologize, if is before whom). Well, and among the there will be losses, after all not all agree on a graft. Well so losses in any war. In an ideal, of course, that you had an immunity and at the opponent is not present. But it is improbable. To me it is not clear why so thoughtlessly concerned a subject? To mine it is an ideal - future world wars if will be, with the epidemiological weapon. And not as earlier when natural viruses, and already with engaging of the genius of scientific thought and all advanced researches in the field of gene engineering were used. Well and where you then thrust to yourselves the tanks?