1

Topic: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

it here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/micr … tarepeater (v=vs.140).aspx to me that, it is necessary to decompile Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.VS.dll? I can not find initial texts...

2

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: >  it here: > https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/micr … tarepeater (v=vs.140).aspx > to me that, it is necessary to decompile >Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.VS.dll >? > I can not find initial texts... When setting something launch, there normally there is a tick about the consent with the license and the link where it is necessary to click that the license to read. And what, someone on the Internet promised, what on all there should be initial texts?

3

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

N> When setting something launch, there normally there is a tick about the consent with the license and the link where it is necessary to click that the license to read. N> And what, someone on the Internet promised, what on all there should be initial texts? You complained that at you there stole something. I am going to steal DataRepeater at Microsoft. They wrote that this component is delivered as Free. But the matter is that I do package for Exherbo Linux, with the assembly of initial texts. And there by rules it is necessary to inscribe a title of the license for initial texts. I am going to decompile, create a repository on github and to inscribe MS-PL, but all the same necessity to steal slightly strains...

4

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

Sinix, what the ridiculous? It is impossible to find the license. To install exe-shnik through Wine that license text to esteem? You suggest me to do the separate implementation (well, by analogy with DataGridView how it is made itself DataRepeater)? So it will not coincide on names and it is necessary  remaining source codes that they clung my implementation instead of .

5

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: N>> When setting something launch, there normally there is a tick about the consent with the license and the link where it is necessary to click that the license to read. N>> And what, someone on the Internet promised, what on all there should be initial texts? > you complained that at you there stole something. > I am going to steal DataRepeater at Microsoft. > They wrote that this component is delivered as Free. > but the matter is that I do package for Exherbo Linux, with the assembly of initial texts. And there by rules it is necessary to inscribe a title of the license for initial texts. I am going to decompile, create a repository on github and to inscribe MS-PL, but all the same necessity to steal slightly strains... If you are going to decompile, probably and the license text can dig out. It all in one exe-shnike What there to steal, all is elementary. Faster the to make, at the same time will than be proud being strained

6

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

N> if you are going to decompile, probably and the license text can dig out. It in one exe-shnike I downloaded all.dll-ku in the unpacked type, not from a site microsoft. Because it faster. I will give a warranty of absence of bookmarks on source codes so there is no difference - is authentic initial  or not. N> What there to steal, all is elementary. N> faster the to make, at the same time will than be proud being strained it . So it is possible also all software on the Russian alphabet to rewrite. The right, after all anything difficult.

7

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

> But the matter is that I do package for Exherbo Linux, with the assembly of initial texts. And there by rules it is necessary to inscribe a title of the license for initial texts. I am going to decompile, create a repository on github and to inscribe MS-PL, but all the same necessity to steal slightly strains... By the way yes, ridiculously, to you presses nothing in your explanation? If somewhere by rules it is necessary to interpose the license text after all it is obvious, what only that license which it resolves? Or it is not obvious? I.e. you want to steal and interpose there the text of license MS? Such inscription on a windshield - "is stolen", and is proud to go

8

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

> it . So it is possible also all software on the Russian alphabet to rewrite. The right, after all anything difficult. And spit, what for generally to be strained, when to you allowed a software to use free of charge in that type in which it is. It is written in that license. If they wanted to give you source codes, they and made it. And that  you simultaneously MS and that place where you something want to lay out

9

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

N>  you I calculate for imperceptible Joe's effect. Microsoft already replaced strategy, Windows. Forms it is not necessary to it, there all on WPF. Therefore there should not be at them an interest to my project. And without their request  will not be.

10

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

> I calculate for imperceptible Joe's effect. Microsoft already replaced strategy, Windows. Forms it is not necessary to it, there all on WPF. Therefore there should not be at them an interest to my project. And without their request  will not be. How think, those who demand to spread with the source code and the license - they it is simple so?

11

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

N> those who demand to spread with the source code and the license They too do not recheck. Packets of hundred thousand. Well the laid out code was mistaken with the license, there will be claims - rewrite.

12

Re: class DataRepeater - where at it the source codes, what license,

> They too do not recheck. Packets of hundred thousand. Well the laid out code was mistaken with the license, there will be claims - rewrite. Well apprx. yours energy in the peace purposes