1

Topic: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote:  2 https://www.primefaces.org/primeng/#/ For a long time wrote article ASP.NET Core, Angular 2, SignalR for teapots Well and usage   CEF, ES6, Angular 2, WebPack 2.Net Core  application without a server part

2

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote: > It was required  small . In the past had experience  with ExtJS + ExtDirect versions 4, basically to live with it it is possible, but to be returned to it a reluctance as something they there once again  and it is necessary to read month of the book again. And on architecture there as all kept on spells and snivels, and keeps. Whether > There was during the last years something for Web UI compiled at least from TypeScript? The standard dial-up - buttons, trees,  is necessary, modal dialogues, subjects, and it is very desirable without billion controlers, and that  in compile time? kendo ui, but it costs money.

3

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote: > Hello, Sharov, you wrote: S>> kendo ui, but it costs money. > did not understand. And that it then in GitHub is laid out? Under Apache2? 1) sorry, did not know. At me become outdated inf-ija from 2014-2015; 2) this any to a bark, i.e. there is probable only a certain minimum; 3) well and . Support at a forum will be anyhow Generally I them used (), at them quite good integration with . But I actively was engaged in it (SPA) 2-3 years ago. Now there, , much exchanged.

4

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote: > It was required  small . In the past had experience  with ExtJS + ExtDirect versions 4, basically to live with it it is possible, but to be returned to it a reluctance as something they there once again  and it is necessary to read month of the book again. And on architecture there as all kept on spells and snivels, and keeps. Whether > There was during the last years something for Web UI compiled at least from TypeScript? The standard dial-up - buttons, trees,  is necessary, modal dialogues, subjects, and it is very desirable without billion controlers, and that  in compile time?  "Enterprise" libraries devexpress/devextreme (is including for typescript/angular) Clarity (angular) (semantic ui confused, ) Office UI fabric (react) At all (except last from  - it in basically free, but has some license restrictions), are the paid and free version.  type ngx-blabla (valor softawre), also as well as prime ng, go directly to wood.

5

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote: > git clone https://github.com/OfficeDev/office-ui-fabric-react.git > On npm install this  exhausted from a network , something there compiles and does not think to stop. > as with it to live? (And  you from source codes collect it? Or I that did not understand? Enough npm install - save office-ui-fabric-react npm start in your project And so yes, it is quite quite good. All office 365 / SharePoint "modern" UI on it is made. . Corrected the message above - I meant CLARITY (vmware) actually under #2,

6

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote: > Hello, bnk, you wrote: bnk>> And so yes, it is quite quite good. All office 365 / SharePoint "modern" UI on it is made. > it  yes. But  I do not see Also any richtext-editor too I do not see.  they also are not present ribbon for a web I to tell the truth generally anywhere did not see. About richtext it is possible on CKEditor to look. We now in office became documents stupidly "Word" (through office web apps) began to edit.

7

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, Sharov, you wrote: S> 2) this any to a bark, i.e. there is probable only a certain minimum; There on principal page there is a comparing. In Core only simple  (which, I suspect and so is in any library). All difficult - Grid, TreeView, Charts, Editor... - only in the paid version.

8

Re: Re: What now it is fashionable for UI?

Hello, , you wrote: > It  yes. But  I do not see And they from it in Web leave. I.e. modern site collection (which in SharePoint Online and in SharePoint 2016) already go without . And probably, in it something is: ribbon initially formed for the difficult interface of editing of a content. And here such it is not enough.